Big Brother Watch reveals council's use of controversial surveillance powers increased

Big Brother Watch reveals council's use of controversial surveillance powers increased Big Brother Watch reveals council's use of controversial surveillance powers increased

THE use of controversial surveillance powers designed to fight terrorism increased dramatically in Wirral over the past three years.

The town hall’s use of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act – RIPA –rose from just two occasions in 2008/09 to 23 last year.

The surveillance operations exploit anti-terror laws but many local authorities have been using them in gaining evidence of minor offences.

In Wirral, the powers have been used in targeting the unauthorised positioning of a skip, fly-tipping and testing shops suspected of selling fireworks, cigarettes or alcohol to under-18s.

Liverpool is one of 16 local authorities which used RIPA more than 100 times between 2008 and 2011. In the same period, Wirral carried out 33 surveillance operations, St Helens 15 and Sefton five.

Research carried out by civil liberties and privacy campaign group Big Brother Watch details how between 2009 and 2011, local authorities used the powers contained in the controversial Act more than 9,600 times.

The law changed this year to stop councils using RIPA without a magistrate’s approval, but other public bodies do not require any such permission.

When Wirral Council first reviewed its use of the powers in 2009, the then-chairman of its corporate scrutiny committee, Cllr Leah Fraser, argued strongly against town hall staff being authorised to undertake surveillance.

Responding to the latest figures, she said today: "RIPA powers were introduced to tackle terror and serious crime, so what on earth is going on when it’s used for the unauthorised positioning of a skip?

"It’s disproportionate, like taking a sledge hammer to crack a nut.

"In spite of a major review of use of RIPA in Wirral in 2009, it would seem taxpayers’ money is still being wasted on bankrolling an army of town hall spies acting out their James Bond fantasies.

"Serious crime needs to be tackled - which is why we have the police force."

In response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act, seven public authorities refused to disclose why or how often they have used the powers, while a further 13 authorities confirmed they do use them.

Seven public authorities able to use surveillance under RIPA refused to disclose how often, for what purpose and what type of surveillance they have undertaken. They include the BBC, Ofsted, the Royal Mail and the Office for Fair Trading.

The research found Kent is the worst local authority in the country for RIPA investigations, having spied on residents 315 times in three years.

Tweny-six local authorities used the snooper powers to spy on dog-owners to see whose animals were responsible for dog,fouling, while seven councils used them to investigate suspected breaches of the smoking ban.

Deputy Leader of Wirral Council, Cllr Ann McLachlan, said: “Wirral Council has used RIPA powers effectively to tackle issues such as anti-social behaviour, fly-tipping and underage sales, which can have a real impact on communities.

“We know from first hand experience that these issues can seriously affect the wellbeing of local residents and lead to further problems if they are not dealt with effectively.

"The use of surveillance permitted under RIPA can provide vital evidence for us to take action against offenders.

"On the occasions that we use this surveillance, it is always within the strict guidelines set out by the legislation.”

Comments(17)

Ben Beaconsfield says...
11:02am Wed 22 Aug 12

What a pity Wirral Council didn't use these intrusive powers to spy on its own Adult Social Services Department.

bigfoot says...
11:03am Wed 22 Aug 12

Ben Beaconsfield wrote:
What a pity Wirral Council didn't use these intrusive powers to spy on its own Adult Social Services Department.
....and other dodgy officers and councillors!

red devil says...
2:10pm Wed 22 Aug 12

Why are these powers controversial? If you have nothing to hide, no problem

red devil says...
2:11pm Wed 22 Aug 12

"Serious crime needs to be tackled - which is why we have the police force."

We do?

WirralAl says...
2:36pm Wed 22 Aug 12

Why is it not a crime to fail so many as WBC have and steal from poor vulnerable people. Fly tipping by comparison is nothing compared to the millions wasted by the buffoons that we empower!

Throwing stones from glass houses the council should be ashamed of themselves.

Jimrob says...
6:36pm Wed 22 Aug 12

red devil wrote:
Why are these powers controversial? If you have nothing to hide, no problem
Sorry RD, but it is my humble opinion that such comments are a contributory factor to the sorry state of affairs that we, the General Public, now find ourselves. No power to determine our own destiny or maintain our own privacy.
The "If you ain't done 'owt wrong, you got now't to worry about" slogan is one invented by the very people who want to spy on our every move. In some country's this is called voyerism and is a crime. but in ours, it is becoming an ever increasing passtime of those people who like to term themselves "The Authorities" Ask yourself something, where does thier "Authority" come from? It's through us, the electorate, yet we are NEVER given a say in the erection of CCTV or how it's used.
And lastly, I bet Julian Asange never thought he would be persecuted for telling the truth, but this is the result of having people who say "If you ain't done 'owt wrong........."
The "Authorities" are constantly changing the rules and the law (To suit themselves and thier own interests) When you, RD, find yourself in a prison cell for mearly protesting or telling the truth, thanks to some CCTV footage that was taken of you, I hope you think long and hard about the term "If you ain't done now't wrong, you got now't to worry about.
(Nothing personal RD, just my own take on the subject)

spamfiend says...
7:16pm Wed 22 Aug 12

Jimrob, you mention Julian Assange being 'persecuted for telling the truth' but what people forget about this guy is the fact he is avoiding going to Sweden to face serious allegations and is using this as his own political motivation.
Respect as always with regards to your post!

Jimrob says...
10:18pm Wed 22 Aug 12

spamfiend wrote:
Jimrob, you mention Julian Assange being 'persecuted for telling the truth' but what people forget about this guy is the fact he is avoiding going to Sweden to face serious allegations and is using this as his own political motivation. Respect as always with regards to your post!
Spamfiend, with equal respect for your post I would point out that what, if anything, Julian Assange is accused of in Sweden, would NOT constitute a crime at all in this country. (thereby emphasising my point about the "Authorities" changing rules and laws to suit thier own means)
Also, I would point out that Julian Assange is NOT "avoiding going to sweden to face serious allegations" He is avoiding being delivered into the hands of the Americans by thier Swedish partners against Free-Speech.
I would aslo point out that Mr Assange's legal team has always made Mr Assange available to be interviewed by the Swedish Authorities, even the President of Ecuador has made available the Embassey to interview him in. But suprise suprise, the Swedish Authorities have declined these offers. This despite the same Authorities actually going to Iraq to interview Crimes Against Humanity suspects. Strange that don't you think?
Big Brother is alive and well and doing rather well here in the UK.This country should be ashamed of it's actions and it's anti-population policies.

Ben Beaconsfield says...
11:15am Thu 23 Aug 12

Assange being extradited to the United States by the Swedish authorities is as good a bet as Frankel was in winning the Juddmonte International at York yesterday afternoon (and what a performance, by the way !!).

People need to understand that in this post-empire period of history, there is still one massive monopoly of empire in this world - the USA. They do as they wish, either militarily or by means of massive economic pressure, and nobody dares murmur dissent. We pretend there is a 'special relationship' between Britain and the USA, but I suppose that meaningless description could equally have been used to describe the relationship between master and slave in the pre-Civil War South.

PaulCa says...
4:34pm Thu 23 Aug 12

red devil wrote:
Why are these powers controversial? If you have nothing to hide, no problem
Problem with this, as ever, is you may have 'nothing to hide' but you have to be able to trust the officials, who have a good deal of power over your destiny and that of any vulnerable friends and family members.

And with 4 directors currently suspended, who can put their hand on their heart and say they trust Wirral Council?

EddieGremlin says...
1:39pm Fri 24 Aug 12

Does anyone know if fixed CCTV has EVER actually PREVENTED an act of terrorism. Or come to that, EVER actually PREVENTED a crime (this does not include littering or smoking etc.)

Jimrob says...
8:24pm Fri 24 Aug 12

EddieGremlin wrote:
Does anyone know if fixed CCTV has EVER actually PREVENTED an act of terrorism. Or come to that, EVER actually PREVENTED a crime (this does not include littering or smoking etc.)
Well EddieG,

According to the National News yesterday. The Police in New York have just admitted that despite watching the every public move of all citizens and tourists in the City for the past 6 years. Not one instance can be recounted where the cameras have helped detect or prevent a single act of terrorism.

I hope this answers your question EddieG.

On a lighter note:

I presume that we humans are becoming boring to the Authorities, as it was announced today (On the same National News Channel) That scientists have glued transmitters onto the backs of a thousand ants in order to study thier movements. Perhaps the "Authorities" will leave us alone for a while now, and we can look foreward to seeing endless programs on the TV about what ants get up to when they think no one is watching them. Lol.

(I kid you not, the story about the ants is true, you can google it if you think it worth while) haha

Hugo2009 says...
6:01pm Tue 28 Aug 12

This is a curious posting, myself I would like a transmitter glued to the back of our 66 local Council parasites, then we could all watch and learn what little they actually do or dont as the case may be.
If they could als be miked up we would be able to listen in to all the amazing behind closed doors discussions that in effect lavish much of our money on things we do not want or need.
Then we would be in a unique situation where we the public could monitor the service, attention, and facilities, that we do need and do require and that provide value for money.
Now would that not be a good form of surveylance that would benefit all of us.

whatdotheythinkweare says...
6:11pm Tue 28 Aug 12

Jimrob wrote:
spamfiend wrote:
Jimrob, you mention Julian Assange being 'persecuted for telling the truth' but what people forget about this guy is the fact he is avoiding going to Sweden to face serious allegations and is using this as his own political motivation. Respect as always with regards to your post!
Spamfiend, with equal respect for your post I would point out that what, if anything, Julian Assange is accused of in Sweden, would NOT constitute a crime at all in this country. (thereby emphasising my point about the "Authorities" changing rules and laws to suit thier own means)
Also, I would point out that Julian Assange is NOT "avoiding going to sweden to face serious allegations" He is avoiding being delivered into the hands of the Americans by thier Swedish partners against Free-Speech.
I would aslo point out that Mr Assange's legal team has always made Mr Assange available to be interviewed by the Swedish Authorities, even the President of Ecuador has made available the Embassey to interview him in. But suprise suprise, the Swedish Authorities have declined these offers. This despite the same Authorities actually going to Iraq to interview Crimes Against Humanity suspects. Strange that don't you think?
Big Brother is alive and well and doing rather well here in the UK.This country should be ashamed of it's actions and it's anti-population policies.
Jimrob
Perhaps you have misunderstood what he is facing trial for... perhaps you have not made it clear in your post your intended views (respect) but...

I am astounded how you can say it wouldn't be a crime in UK. In this country, sexual assault/rape whatever you want to call it IS A CRIME!! Definition of rape is non-consensual sexual activity. How can one consent if asleep?

Whether he is found guilty or not is a different matter, but rape is what he is facing trial for in Sweden. It is USA where he faces allegations of the digital world.

antisthenes says...
6:37pm Tue 28 Aug 12

Sadly the exponential expansion of the use of CCTV in the public realm has been used as a substitute for the 'natural surveillance' afforded by patrolling police, bus conductors, park police whose physical presence in other countries has been demonstrated by validated research to be a more effective deterent in respect of curtailing what is now euphamistically called anti social behaviour.

Ben Beaconsfield says...
7:01pm Tue 28 Aug 12

Isn't Assange only "wanted for questioning" not "facing trial" - or has a decision already been made in his absence and without hearing a defence?
The Americans must be rubbing their hands at how we Europeans roll over and let our bellies be ticked at the slightest hint.

whatdotheythinkweare says...
10:28am Wed 29 Aug 12

My apologies Ben... I think it is questioning...

however, the allegation made against him WOULD still be a crime in this country.

I understand it could simply be a ploy to pass him onto the US authorities... but if you can't do the time etc...

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree