News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Mersey Tunnel tolls frozen for another year

Tunnel tolls have been frozen at £1.40 for another year.

A bid by Moreton and Saughall West councillor Chris Blakeley to have the tolls reduced by 10p for regular tunnel users was defeated.

After yesterday's meeting of the Merseytravel board, Cllr Blakeley told the Globe: "We tried to get the tunnel burden reduced for the people of Merseyside.

"But they spurned that opportunity and I find that dreadful.

"However, I'm absolutely delighted that the tolls haven't gone up. "But we had a real opportunity today, one that might not be presented to us again because next year we could find the toll triggered to £1.60."

Councillor Mark Dowd, Merseytravel chairman, said: ”We are delighted that we have been able to retain the tolls at their current level for a further 12 months.

“Under the Mersey Tunnels Act we are obliged to keep tolls in line with RPI but there is a clause which allows us to freeze them in exceptional economic or social conditions.

"There is however, no provision under the Act which allows any other variation.

"This would require a change in the Act itself.

“Claims that we were considering a 20p rise are complete nonsense."

Cllr Dowd said that a report published earlier this week by consultants Colin Buchanan makes clear damage would be caused if the tunnels were toll-free.

"It would result in an estimated net loss of £80m of retail spending from the Wirral, and 600 retail jobs.”

Dave Loudon, chairman of the Mersey Tunnels Users Association, welcomed the decision that there would be no increase.

He said: "This will save a regular user from having to hand over an extra £100 over the next 12 months.

"There is a very big sting in the tail, as the report to members implied that the toll will almost certainly be increased in 2011.

"We urge everyone to lobby their councillors over this issue. Any tolls divide the people on one side of the river from the other and damage the local economy.

"This prospective increase will further discourage new businesses from coming here".

Comments(7)

No.9 says...
2:27pm Fri 5 Feb 10

OK... Then we need to get the Mersey Tunnels Act changed. A change of government combined with excellent campaigning from our local MPs, especially Chris Blakeley, may do the trick.

Who's heard from consultants Colin Buchanan? Not me! Not any of my colleagues who run their own businesses! Their report paints such a rosy picture in favour of tolls that it seems too good to be true... maybe it isn't!

I'm absolutely certain that if I had the kind of funds (courtesy of tunnel users) that Mark Dowd has access to, then I could arrange for for a "report" supporting the removal of this unfair tax.

Let's not forget how desperately hard Mr Dowd and his fellow highwaymen fought to force through the Mersey Tunnels Act and how much of our hard earned money he used to do it... not forgetting the support of pay-per-vote Scottish Labour MPs, most of whom had no idea what they were voting for when the act was passed.

Let's also not forget that he's taken over £30 million from tunnel users to spend on anything but the Tunnels since the Act was forced through... now perhaps this can be seen as a benefit - £30 million to spend which wouldn't have been available without tolls. But this money has been taken from a relatively small number of people (mainly Wirral commuters) to be used for all kinds of projects across Merseyside. This is not fair! Why not toll the Aigburth Road or the East Lancs to pay for this and lay off the Wirral Commuters? A rise in council tax across all the councils would be more fair.

BULLITT says...
4:31pm Fri 5 Feb 10

I have no objection to paying a toll to use the tunnels. (I work in the city) but I see no reason to increase it on a regular basis ,which is what appears to happen. Perhaps they could do away with the 'tunnel police' who I find to be most incompetent. All that is required is something similar as at the Dartford Tunnel. They work most efficiently, escorting heavy goods etc. and removing stranded vehicles in a most professional manner.
I am straying. The toll should remain, it regulates the vehicle flow and contributes to the upkeep of the tunnels but keep it at a simple level. Why not update the equipment to that used on the M6 Toll road ?

Jayo says...
8:34pm Fri 5 Feb 10

Thanks for trying Councillor Chris Blakeley. I thought the other members especially the lib-Dem's might try to increase the toll just to metaphorically kick you up the backside for announcing the toll freeze last week.
*****
I agree BULLITT a toll should remain but £1 is more than enough.
I find it incredulous that the Mersey tunnels act only has provision to increase the toll and it would be against the act to lower the toll. This sounds like the policy of an idiot to me.

hugo2008 says...
10:21am Sun 7 Feb 10

Give the regular Mersey Tunnel Users some say on how the vast profits are spent, at present huge amounts of money is paid to the Councillors who sit on the Committee. Huge amounts of money is spent on other things than the Mersey Tunnels. Yet the ones who pay this unfair tax have no say in the matters.
This is Taxation but no Representation, that is morally and legally wrong, end it.
Do not praise any local councillor who allows this to happen, vote them out at every occasion.

glenn, moreton says...
9:50pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Great news to hear that merseytravel are listening to one colin buchanan who appears to know more than anyone else the value of keeping the tunnels as tolled - more work for themselves for a start. Pretty terrible really, I mean who would want 600 people (according to them) to lose their jobs? Not me, but have they considered the impact to haulage companies and other cross river operators who can't expand because of this short-sighted restriction to trade within the same county, or operators from outside the area who would rather 'go round' a la m6 toll than pay the extortionate £5.80(which is more than the m6 toll, and look how empty that is even in heavy traffic!) and serve other 'more accessible' areas? No, I don't think so. But then again they're not thinking of others are they? More about how much they can get for gardening and cleaning fees, or how they can push their own hidden agendas through by not not being caught at all and capitalising on that false image by inadvertently being made to look angelic.(although they're not.) You know who you are!

hugo2008 says...
7:41pm Thu 11 Feb 10

I agree the Tunnel Crossings need a toll payment just for the upkeep and maintenance.
But why does it have to pay a Chief Executive and Directors six figure salaries, plus two hands full of Councillors, Expenses that are about three times the Average Wage.
Then this bunch of self serving managers spend the huge profits on anything other than the Tunnel Crossings with out any reference to those who have been forced to pay the Toll Money in the first place.
It is simply Taxation without Representation, and that is basically wrong in every sense.

uptondave says...
12:18am Wed 17 Feb 10

When you read a consultant's report first consider who was paying them. Are we really to believe that tolls are an economic tool to deter Wirral residents from spending their money in Liverpool? Don't they realise the tunnels run both ways? And if there would be long queues without tolls we must assume tolls are actually there to put us off using the tunnels! As if there are no queues at peak hours now. They must think we have no critical faculties at all.

click2find

Most popular