News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: Revealed - the councillors and senior council officers with access to the draft Wirral libraries report

Cllr Steve Foulkes Cllr Steve Foulkes

THE IDENTITIES of thirteen councillors and senior officers given access to the confidential draft report into the Wirral library closure inquiry can be revealed tonight.

The Globe can also reveal that the selected group had been in possession of the draft report since July 27, weeks earlier than commonly thought.

Those with copies of the report include Labour group leader Cllr Steve Foulkes, who is the council leader, and Liberal Democrat leader Simon Holbrook, who is the deputy council leader.

Senior officers who received the report include council chief executive Steve Maddox, his deputy Jim Wilkie, regeneration director Alan Stennard - whose department came up with the idea of closing eleven of the borough's 24 libraries as part of the borough's controversial Strategic Asset Review - and tourism and marketing chief Emma Degg.

The names of all recipients have been released this evening in a letter to all councillors and senior officers from Bill Norman, the borough solicitor - who it has always been known was in possession of the report.

His revelation follows an extraordinary meeting of the council last night in which Mr Norman was asked by opposition Conservative Cllr Ian Lewis to name those who had access to the draft report prepared by inspector Sue Charteris following her two week local inquiry in June, which was passed on to Mr Norman for "fact checking" purposes on July 27.

The Conservatives believe the contents of the report led to the surprise announcement by the ruling Lib-Lab cabinet on September 30 that it was revoking the controversial library closure programme.

The cabinet insist the decision to scrap the closure programme was made because the inquiry had dragged on so long that any prospective savings could not now be realised this year.

No Conservative councillors had access to the report.

In his letter this evening - in which he makes clear he has "no objection to this email being shared with the press or public" - Mr Norman, the council's director of law, lists those he shared the draft with.

They are:

Steve Maddox, Wirral Council chief executive

Jim Wilkie, deputy chief executive

Alan Stennard, director of regeneration

Ian Coleman, director of finance

Howard Cooper, director of children and young people

Jim Lester, head of cultural services

Emma Degg, head of tourism and marketing

Rosemary Lyon, interim head of legal and member services

Cllr Steve Foulkes, council leader and Labour group leader

Cllr Simon Holbrook, deputy council leader and Liberal Democrat group leader

Cllr Phil Davies, deputy Labour group leader and cabinet member for children's services and lifelong learning

Cllr Gill Gardiner, deputy Lib Dem group leader and cabinet member for the environment

Councillor Bob Moon, Lib Dem cabinet member for culture, tourism and leisure

In his emailed letter this evening, Mr Norman writes that he was sent the draft report from inspector Sue Charteris on July 27.

He says he "only circulated the draft report to those members within the cabinet and those officers from whom I needed comments prior to responding to Sue Charteris".

The email adds: "As the recipient of the letter, that judgement fell to me and I accept personal responsibility for my decision in that regard (this was not a matter on which I took any external legal advice).

"However, I wish to emphasise that my decision was absolutely not intended to be a reflection as to any individual member’s ability to respect confidences.

"I was asked [at last night's full council meeting] to list those persons to whom I have shown a copy of the draft report.

"Although I do not believe that there is any legal obligation on me to disclose this information, equally I understand the exceptional level of interest in this matter.

"I have therefore decided to provide that information."

Mr Norman moved to allay fears that the Charteris report may never be published, insisting in bold letters that it will, once it has been considered by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, which ordered the local inquiry.

Tory group leader Jeff Green, speaking to the Globe during a break in the Wirral Youth Parliament debate at Wallasey Town Hall tonight, said: "There is something very rotten within Wirral Council.

"It seems indicative of the way this administration is run. One person has already been in touch with me to apologise for saying 'no' when I asked them previously if they'd seen a copy of the report.

"I'm the leader of the largest group on Wirral Council. How come the officers don't seem to think I am an appropriate person to see the report?"

Cllr Ian Lewis - who had challenged Mr Norman during Monday evening's council meeting to name the recipients of the report - said: "Obtaining any information on the library closures has been like pulling teeth.

"While I am grateful to finally receive the list of the selected few who have been given access to the report, I am disappointed that we still do not know what is in it.

"The councillors in the areas affected by the cuts should have been given the same access to the report for 'fact checking', rather than just the 'in crowd' of the most senior officers and some of the ruling cabinet."

Liscard Conservative Cllr Leah Fraser said: "This is yet further evidence of the secretive way in which the people running this council choose to do business.

"It's as though the Freedom of Information campaign has passed them by.

"What we are seeing is 'the state knows best' and that the taxpayers and library users of this borough can't be trusted by the current cabinet running Wirral.

"This cannot go on - it is time for a fundamental change in the way the Metropolitan Borough of Wirral operates."

STAY WITH GLOBE ONLINE, FIRST FOR WIRRAL NEWS EVERY TIME

Comments(17)

piggymalone says...
9:27pm Tue 13 Oct 09

So now we not only have councillors who choose to hide information from the electorate but now we also have to contend with unelected council officers making decisions on who can have information and who can not. There we numerous calls at the meeting for Foulkes and Holbrook to resign but this action by Norman proves that he is working on behalf of the ruling party and he should now resign or be sacked....an absolute disgraceful act from a council officer

Jim O'Neil says...
8:02am Wed 14 Oct 09

A very interesting article.....it seems that, albeit incredibly late in the day, Bill Norman has finally found the courage to do the right thing. Perhaps doing so earlier would have endangered his job, I don't know and it should not be that way, but if so then that is a terrible position for anyone to be put in.One way or another, the report will see the light of day and don't forget we do have our victory.

hugo2008 says...
8:54am Wed 14 Oct 09

It is the right and proper duty of the electorate in any location to understand and take action against those they have elected if they feel for one moment that the sytem of secret behind closed doors actions that have take place is in any way a complete betrayal of their trust and understanding of Democracy.
Remember your local representative is supposed to be looking after your interests, on your behalf.
My belief is they have demonstrated that the do not give a monkeys about what you think.
It is fair you return the compliment come election time.

minimad69 says...
9:09am Wed 14 Oct 09

What a surprise - not a single library specialist on the list !

Damage limitation not service provision methinks...!

I hope the cabinet - have not asked Mr Norman to fall on the metaphorical sword - he did not write the report - the authors and their supporting cronies are the ones that need to be put to the sword !!!!

piggymalone says...
9:36am Wed 14 Oct 09

Jim, I dont quite know where you get the idea from that Norman has done the right thing. An unelected council officer choosing who a public enquiry repot is released to.....I think that this action is bordering on the criminal, even if he is the borough solicitor. Had you been at the meeting you would have immediately noticed the guilt on his face the second he was asked the question about the public enquiry draft

wicked sheep says...
4:15pm Wed 14 Oct 09

In my view, Mr Norman has compromised himself and has lost face and trust. I'd go so far as to say that his 'pants are on fire..'

frank h says...
4:38pm Wed 14 Oct 09

my my the plot thickens and its not even 5th of November foulksey baby
attached is a letter sent to Sue Charteris

While I welcome Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council decision of removing the threat of closure of libraries, I am truly concerned in their reasons of why they have made this decision; the length of time of inquiry, there was no outcome from it, any savings from this year to be used for the new developments had been lost, running out of time to find the £1m savings needed to balance this year’s budget. Are these are the real reasons why this council had decided that the closure programme had been revoked.

By taking this action despite the Cabinet of Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council having the result of your inquiry for over a month and no doubt constant remarks on the inquiry, to say this is the reason on their U turn the community of Wirral does not believe it.
We are now in a position where the result of your inquiry shall never be released. So allegedly if this council does not support the findings of a government inquiry all they have to do is revoke their original decision and everything is fine in the garden.

I amongst a large number attended two days of your inquiry during those two days listened too individuals form various walks of life making protests to yourself to keep our library’s open, now to have the opportunity of reading the results of why your decision was made taken away from us obscene.
If your decision was to close the libraries (I don’t know that may have been your decision) would Wirral Borough Council take this decision?

I don’t know the remit in what action can be taken by yourself, but if the outcome was your report making any decision then I feel that the community of Wirral should have the report made available or to re-open the inquiry and give your decision verbally.

I also believe that if this is taken as part of procedural rules I also want to make a point that if the decision was totally against the wishes of the community with no credibility to the decision as found as a result of the inquiry I feel that the officers and councillors should be surcharged for the whole of the amount. Why should the rate payers pay for their incompetence?


wicked sheep says...
5:06pm Wed 14 Oct 09

Now let's hear how much all this has cost the Wirral tax-payer? No fobbing off, give us the facts and full transparency with the figures. How much?

Govwatcher says...
8:49pm Wed 14 Oct 09

The time has come for all Council meetings, discussions and decisions to be made public. It is our money they are handling ( a term I don't use lightly in context) and obviously we Wirral residents, are all being taken for fools.

The Parliamentary Act, passed by this discredited Government, which Councils hide behind to hold meetings in secret needs repealing forthwith.

Now we have evidence of the situation, this is also the opportunity to start demanding for all Council expediture to be made transparent, to the public, including full Councillors expenses (which we would identify as salaries) plus travelling meal/accommodation costs to meetings and junkets they attend fully receipted.

My trust of this Council has long been demolished.

TheLooseCannon says...
9:27pm Wed 14 Oct 09

I very much regret doing something earlier this year which has left me feeling very stupid.
.
I put my trust in this Director of Law; I believed what he told me.
.
Not only that, I tried to persuade others that he was an honourable man.
.
Just how stupid can you get?

wotkatydid says...
9:53pm Wed 14 Oct 09

Why exactly have people got it in for Bill Norman? Ulterior motive maybe?
If he was passed this document for comment then surely he is acting perfectly legitimately to share a document with trusted senior members of his council and electorate without compromising himself. Good on him for naming those with access to the report - and as far as I'm concerned and we should be applauding such actions and praying for the good of Wirral that officers like him stay with Wirral not calling for him to be ousted.
Yes it's time for a change, this lib-lab pact is destroying Wirral. I'm a life long labour supporter and will continue to do so at national level but for the first time will be changing my vote at local level.

Leigh Marles says...
9:49am Thu 15 Oct 09

We've removed some comments from this thread.

All commenters, when registering, are made aware of our terms and conditions.

Abuse of those conditions will lead to comments being removed.

We understand the libraries story is a long-running and contentious issue. We also understand - from the many comments we receive online, and the thousands of emails and letters - that emotions run high.

However, while criticism of publicly accountable figures is perfectly reasonable, personal attacks are not.

Leigh Marles,
Editor


piggymalone says...
6:44pm Thu 15 Oct 09

Leigh......One of the posts you removed was a reply by me to whatkatydid. I honestly dont rember exactly what I wrote in that post but it was certainly highly critical of Bill Norman and quite rightly so. I will continue to call for his resignation as his choice of who had sight of the report was obviously politically biased and when unelected council officers choose political alliances, the small amount of democracy that is left in the town hall will be gone.

hugo2008 says...
8:23pm Sat 17 Oct 09

I would call for some serious examination as to the professional standards displayed by leading employed officers in Wirral Council, they should be above political underhand decisions, as demonstrated by some elected councilors to withhold information and access to documents from other equally elected council members, who actually represent larger numbers of the electorate than those at present in power, The LIB/LAB pact is a political manouver not a democratic decision.
The legal department of Council have a duty to uphold certain legal standards like fairness and equality. This has not been demonstrated.

hugo2008 says...
8:30pm Sat 17 Oct 09

Leigh, I accept your right to remove posts if in your opinion they are of a personal nature, derogatory or not, perhaps you may consider giving a brief reason why, better still just blank out the comments you do not like, the rest of the post will still probably get the message through, as we all know who the people are who are involved in this whole fiasco.
Heaven forbid you are taking sides.

Leigh Marles says...
5:06pm Sun 18 Oct 09

Hugo,

While we actively encourage our readers to take part in debates, we also have to be mindful - as publishers ultimately responsible for the content on this site, including readers' comments - of any legally actionable remarks, for instance accusing a person of criminal acts.

I can assure you this is not a case of taking sides.

Regards,

Leigh Marles, Editor

piggymalone says...
7:18pm Sun 18 Oct 09

Leigh, may I respectfully suggest that
"malfeasance in public office" is a criminal act. I am well aware of your legal and moral responsibilities as a reputable publisher but by the same token I dont think the public should keep their mouths shut if they believe any organisation or individual has been party to a criminal act. Martin Morton did not ultimately sweep probable illegal activities under the carpet.

click2find

Most popular