News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


WRONG BODY BURIED IN SHOCKING GRAVESIDE MIX UP

WRONG BODY BURIED IN SHOCKING GRAVESIDE MIX UP WRONG BODY BURIED IN SHOCKING GRAVESIDE MIX UP

A FUNERAL firm has apologised to two families after first burying the wrong man - then exhuming the coffin without permission and secretly replacing it with the correct one.

The atrocious blunder by Co-op Funeralcare was made despite a vicar spotting that the coffin being lowered into the grave at Frankby Cemetery bore the completely wrong name.

He was also alerted by a seven-year age difference on the plaque and a crucifix emblem on the coffin - normally associated with Catholic burials and not the Anglican service he was conducting.

When Reverend Andrew Mannings discreetly raised his concerns - bluntly saying he believed there had been “a dreadful mistake” - the female funeral director instead insisted to him that the deceased had two names, and that the correct body had been buried.

But moments after the vicar and the bereaved family had left the graveside, the Co-op staff realised they had indeed made a terrible error.

They immediately arranged for the correct coffin to be brought in a hearse from their funeral home in Liscard Road, Wallasey - where both coffins had been lying in the chapel of rest - along with extra staff from their head office in Birkenhead’s Argyle Street to help swap them over.

The first coffin was then exhumed - in complete contravention of the Burial Act 1857 - and replaced with the correct one.

The man whose burial service had already taken place in his absence - with another person’s body in his grave - was then interred later that afternoon without a service, the vicar or any of his family present.

The coffin buried by mistake was returned to the chapel of rest in Wallasey, and the deceased cremated days later in a Catholic ceremony at Landican as planned.

Rev Mannings, the vicar at St Mary’s Church in Withens Lane, Wallasey, only learned of the shocking turn of events three days after the December 12 “burial” when embarrassed Co-op staff contacted him to own up.

He insisted immediately on conducting another burial service for the man who’d missed his own funeral and also made contact with the deceased’s family.

The Globe understands that a sexton - the council-employed official who attends funerals to ensure all legal paperwork is in order - has since been suspended by Wirral Council.

But all members of Co-op Funeralcare staff involved in the mix up are still working.

The Co-op told the Globe in a statement that it had apologised to both families and believed the matter had been settled “amicably”.

The Burial Act - designed to protect the sanctity of those who have passed away - does accomodate for when “from time to time, coffins are placed in the wrong grave”.

But it clearly states: “A licence will be required if they are to be removed and replaced in the correct grave.

“The question may arise as to whether a licence is needed in such circumstances, especially where the mistake has been identified during or immediately after the funeral.

“The Department for Constitutional Affairs understands that the remains should be regarded as buried on completion of the committal procedure and that therefore remains should not be removed after that point without a licence.”

A spokeswoman for Co-operative Funeralcare said: “Regrettably we can confirm that, as a result of an unfortunate error, the wrong deceased was taken for burial.

“This was noticed at the graveside. The deceased was immediately returned to the funeral home after the mourners had left the graveside.

“The correct deceased was subsequently interred and a private memorial service was offered to the family.

“We have apologised to both families and provided them with complete details of the incident and believe we have amicably settled the matter.

“We are currently carrying out an extensive investigation as to how this regrettable error occurred.

“We are aware of the legal regulations regarding burials and exhumation, however, at the time of the incident, all parties acted in good faith and in the best interests of both families concerned.

“The necessary steps have been taken to apply for an exhumation order, on a retrospective basis.”

A spokesman for the Diocese of Chester, Stephen Regan, said: “The Vicar of St Mary’s, Manor Lane, Liscard, the Revd Andrew Mannings, noticed that the coffin brought to the funeral was not the usual type for the burial of an Anglican. It featured a crucifix.

“When he saw that the nameplate bore a name different to that of the man being buried and a different age too, the vicar immediately went to see the sexton and pointed out that something appeared to be seriously wrong.

“What followed was a discussion involving the representative of the funeral directors who absolutely insisted that the coffin contained the body of the right man – and that the deceased man was simply known by two names.

“The funeral directors’ representative insisted that the man buried at Frankby Cemetery on Friday, December 12, was the right man.

“However, our vicar was very shocked to be told by the funeral director a few days later, that, in fact, a mistake had been made, and the wrong body had been brought to the funeral and buried – despite the vicar raising concerns.

“The Revd Mannings has been in touch with the grieving family since to comfort them and has conducted a new funeral service by the graveside where the correct body has now been buried.”

Comments(24)

GotTheirNumber says...
11:40am Wed 7 Jan 09

Silly me. I always assumed funeral directors would know where the law stands on body-snatching.

Wonders never cease.

Dazzzler says...
12:59pm Wed 7 Jan 09

That story makes me shudder. I want cremating as can't stand the thought of being buried and to think it can happen by mistake is scary.

How must the families feel I dread to think.

Bertiebadger says...
4:15pm Wed 7 Jan 09

I think you are grasping the wrong end of the stick Stan. The fact is that the man who should have been in the grave was buried without benefit of a funeral. Now that might not bother most of us but if religious then he would be doomed for all eternity etc.

I haven't a clue what happens to the poor Catholic man who was buried by an Anglican either. Perhaps he is doomed as well?

Of course it should have been made known to all concerned.

StanTheMan says...
6:35pm Wed 7 Jan 09

Doomed for all eternity Bertie, really what you are thinking about here is a bit extreme. You’re saying that someone dies, something like this happens, through no fault of their own and God would condemn them for all eternity, not a very forgiving God that you believe in.
These poor souls have passed away, now is the time to think about the families not some jumped up inconsiderate Revd Andrew Manning who goes out of his way to get it published in the paper. I do feel sorry for all effected but this so called man of the cloth is a glory hunter and with such lack of concern for the families he should be removed from his position.

globereader says...
7:56pm Wed 7 Jan 09

I dont think any readers believe this has been a sick joke by the funeral directors. Those involved will be as distraught as us at this time and each day they conduct a funeral. What I dont understand is the actions of the minister what is he trying to do to the families involved prolong or even worsen the grief they are going through. As he must well know they conduct many many funerals every week as a job and how thoughtful and considerate they are with families at such a sad time. It sounds to me as if he is trying to gain glory from a very distressing mistake and condem a funeral director who I am sure is already suffering with personal guilt,or is he against the co-op funeralcare.

StanTheMan says...
8:10pm Wed 7 Jan 09

Words of wisdom I totally agree globereader.

Spiffy says...
8:19pm Wed 7 Jan 09

I find no statement to confirm that Reverend Andrew Mannings contacted the Globe with this story - for whatever reason, never mind to 'glorify' himself. Indeed there is no source for this story named at all and it is merely written that both parties have commented on the situation from their point of view, apparently when asked to do so by Globe staff.

StanTheMan, as a self-proffessed regular churchgoer you should be ashamed of such an spiteful, vindictive and downright unchristian attitude. You are not in full possession of the facts and have no right whatsoever to call for him to be removed from his position based on this newspaper report. globereader can you also not read ? I am shocked that a man of the cloth is being hung drawn and quatered in this manner. Shame on you both.

Globe editor given the vitriolic outbursts I've seen here you clearly owe it to the ministers reputation, and possibly to his retaining his position in the church and community, to reveal your source. Only then, if at all, should public comments and judgements be made.

StanTheMan says...
8:58pm Wed 7 Jan 09

Your right Spiffy no name has been given but read the article slowly and imagine this.
No comment from the family, the co-op would not create bad publicity nor would the council but there are plenty of rather precise comments made by this minister and also a quote about how he has gone to another minister from the other family to discuss this situation. There are far too many accurate comments made from this minister and someone had to go to the press so yes no name has been mentioned and yes let the Globe Editor reveal the source I bet I am right. Now about my religious beliefs, it is a ministers job to support people in this situation, he by doing this will have only caused more upset to all and for no gain but too himself. Disgraceful behaviour for a minister.

News Editor says...
9:58pm Wed 7 Jan 09

Just to clear up any confusion here, it was we at the Globe who approached Rev Mannings once we had received information about this incident - and by no means the other way round.

There were in fact two original sources for this story, who contacted the Globe separately.

As is usual, we will protect the identity of our sources. But I am more than happy to reiterate that Rev Mannings was not one of them.

Justin Dunn
News Editor
Wirral Globe

Spiffy says...
10:05pm Wed 7 Jan 09

StanTheMan - Given that I can imagine the grief of the families concerned I would prefer not to allow my imagination to interfere with the facts presented in the article. I would like to express my condolences at what must be a very upsetting time and I do hope the matter is eventually resolved to their satisfaction.

To answer you I have read the article and do not see anywhere that he visited another minister from the other family so I can not comment on that. I do see that he visited the other family and comforted them so in that you will agree he did do 'his job'to support them.

About your religious beliefs - Imagining a ministers wrongdoing and slandering him in public thereby damaging his reputation and possibly costing him his job is disgraceful behaviour for anyone, let alone a churchgoer.

Spiffy says...
10:07pm Wed 7 Jan 09

Editor - Thank you for clearing that up. StanTheMan - on your conscience be it.

Lucifer says...
11:09am Thu 8 Jan 09

I agree with Spiffy...Stan'the man' and Globereader seem to think they are judge and jury here,without any proof whatsoever.You two should hang your heads in shame! and obviously need to take a little bit more time when reading.You two clearly make things up as you go along and invent a fictitious reality.
Also Stan what kind of a christian attitude do you show by judging a man?? I don't think you are religious at all,I think your just jumping on the band wagon.

Sympathy to the families concerned.

Lucifer says...
11:15am Thu 8 Jan 09

You haven't even been man enough to admit your wrong Stan and Globereader.

Dantealighieri says...
11:25am Thu 8 Jan 09

Broberts-One of the saving graces of this episode was the fact that up to your post, lawsuits and compensation hadn't been mentioned. You sound like a very interesting person. Do you have many friends? I have resisted the temptation to visit the website as recommended by yourself, preferring to swot up a little first. Therefore I hope you will be able to advise me of any magazines or books on the subject, they would so helpful in passing away the long dreary winter evenings?

daredevil says...
11:43am Thu 8 Jan 09

I am greatly alarmed at hearing of this mix up.As a funeral director and ex employee of funeralcare,I am aware of how many procedures are in place to ensure that something like this should not happen.From what I have heard,read and also a conversation had with Rev Mannings himself,the negligence must lie with the procedures not being adhered to by the funeral director concerned. What followed is going back to the victorian age of grave robbing and beggars belief. I would like to offer my sympathies to both families concerned and may their loved ones rest in peace.

siameseblue says...
12:56pm Thu 8 Jan 09

Reading this news article prompts me to make a comment regarding the Sextons involvement in this senario. Although he was involved in this 'cover-up'I feel very strongly that this man has now been suspended from his position (which to all intent and purposes he should be)until an investigation has been carried out. The Co-op appears to have completed their investigation and ALL staff involved are still carrying out their duties, albeit with rapped knuckles and the Sexton, although involved, but by no means the biggest culprit in this matter, is STILL suspended, awaiting investigation by the Council. If the Co-op can act so swiftly why can't the Council be fair to the man sitting in the cold. Come on Council, get a move on for a change - but then, hey, WHY CHANGE THE HABIT OF A LIFETIME!! Sit on this one, as you have a tendancy to sit on everything for months and months and months and mon........yawn!!!!

Mr Joyboy says...
11:23pm Thu 8 Jan 09

Thank goodness the Revd Andrew Mannings had the foresight to discretely mention the error to the Co-Op funeral director. Had he not, the consequences could have been far worse. Imagine what would have happened if the gentleman concerned had been cremated by mistake. The sexton, it appears, has taken all the rap and the Co-Op Funeral Service been let off lightly! I can't imagine how the families of the deceased must have felt. Fortunately, the Revd Andrew Mannings was able to rescue the situation. I just wonder how often this type of thing has happened before and not been picked up on. Hopefully, it will not happen again, but you never know...

GotTheirNumber says...
10:33am Fri 9 Jan 09

I note the comments aimed in the direction of the minister here and feel those correspondents are entirely missing the point.

The funeral director quite clearly deliberately misled the minister when her error was pointed out by him, when she bluffed that the poor deceased man was known by two names, which evidently he was not.

That was "dreadful error" number one, although it doesn't really seem an "error" to me, more a blatant attempt to bluff her way out of something.

Exhuming the coffin and replacing it with the correct one without the correct permission was "mistake" number two - especially when you bear in mind that the man eventually buried had no family or minister there as he was interred.

The Co-op are no doubt furious that this matter is in the press (one does wonder if any of the above correspondents have links to them) and so they should be because these errors should never have happened in the first place.

It was a gross dereliction of duty by the very people one would expect to trust implicitly at a time of bereavement.

If they can't recognise that, they shouldn't be in the funeral business.

Spiffy says...
11:53am Fri 9 Jan 09

GotTheirNumber: For the record - as one of the above correspondents - I have no affiliation whatsoever to the co-op and I did not miss the point.

I responded to a moral obligation, irrespective of religious belief, to refute the vicious and entirely unjustified attack on the one man who tried to sort out the situation as quickly and as discreetly as possible. The truth will out.

Nuff said.

GotTheirNumber says...
11:55am Fri 9 Jan 09

Spiffy,

My apologies to you. I was referring to the people to whom you obviously also referred.

GTN

Spiffy says...
2:29pm Fri 9 Jan 09

GotTheirNumber:

No worries - just happy to clarify :)

MrsN says...
8:11pm Fri 9 Jan 09

Its quite clear to anyone who know's Reverand Andrew Mannings that he is not a person to cause trouble. This was not dealt with in the right matter or in a hummane way! The Reverand has no reason at to feel ashamed of anything at all! The only person who should feel ashamed is the so called owner of co-op funeral care! They need to learn how to do their jobs properly!

J-Cray-Z says...
8:30pm Fri 9 Jan 09

StanTheMan;
You are a stupid, ignorant fool with no grasp on the actual facts.
I am fully aware of everything that's happened in this matter and have from long before the media got a hold of it and I can tell you with no doubt that the Rev. Andrew Mannings was contacted by THEM and not the other way around. Also you should take note of how the name is spelt before you start trying to drag it through the mud.

Bertiebadger says...
12:44pm Sun 11 Jan 09

StanTheMan, just to set the record straight re the "God I believe in". I am totally none religious and don't believe my comments mentioned being so? I was pointing out that a lot of people do believe and they take religion very seriously.


click2find

Most popular