Birkenhead MP attacks Government over 'growing chaos' in bedroom tax

Birkenhead MP attacks Government over 'growing chaos' in bedroom tax

Birkenhead MP attacks Government over 'growing chaos' in bedroom tax

First published in News
Last updated
Wirral Globe: Photograph of the Author by , Editor

BIRKENHEAD MP Frank Field has condemned “growing chaos” at the heart of the so-called 'bedroom tax' changes to housing benefit.

Following a series of parliamentary questions, Mr Field discovered the Government does not know how many people affected by the tax have downsized to a smaller property, or whether that property has a lower rent.

Under changes to the welfare rules, social housing tenants who are deemed to have more rooms than they need are liable to have their housing benefit cut, removing what ministers call the "spare room subsidy".

The Government maintains it will save money and free up existing stock to cut housing queues.

But Mr Field said the latest admission throws doubt on both of these arguments.

He said: “How on earth can the Government know how much money the bedroom tax will save when it doesn’t even know how many people have downsized?

“If disabled people downsize and need their new property to be adapted, this will end up costing the Government more money.

“Likewise housing associations have warned that families may be forced to downsize into the private sector at a higher rent.

“This vicious policy isn’t achieving anything other than hitting those hardest who can least afford it.”

In another answer, the Government also admitted it does not know how many people in wheelchairs have been hit with the bedroom tax.

  • In a separate attack on the tax, Labour said local authority data showed that as a result of a loophole in the legislation, at least 16,000 households had wrongly had their benefit cut - while the true figure could be closer to 50,000.

The loophole, identified earlier this year, means the tax does not apply to certain tenants who have lived in the same home for more than 17 years.

Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith has previously told MPs that between 3,000 to 5,000 tenants were thought to have been affected by the error.

But after submitting Freedom of Information requests to all 346 local authorities in the UK, Labour said responses from the 140 councils which have so far replied showed that 16,450 households had been incorrectly caught.

In Wirral, 450 tenants of social landlord Magenta are affected plus 150 other tenants. The local authority began repaying the money a fortnight ago.

Shadow work and pensions minister Chris Bryant said that if there was a similar rate of wrongful deductions across the whole country, the final total would be almost 50,000.

The Department for Work and Pensions said the regulations were now being amended and that it still believed its earlier estimate of the numbers affected was correct.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:24am Wed 12 Feb 14

reliant22 says...

If Wirral Labour Authority`s Data collating is anything like as bad as their `GOBBLEDEGOOK` reporting then it must be ignored.
Someone will, for sure, and very soon collate the correct data.
Truth is BETTER than fiction..
If Wirral Labour Authority`s Data collating is anything like as bad as their `GOBBLEDEGOOK` reporting then it must be ignored. Someone will, for sure, and very soon collate the correct data. Truth is BETTER than fiction.. reliant22
  • Score: -1

11:20am Wed 12 Feb 14

pablo26uk says...

No such thing as a bedroom tax, i'm employed and have a spare bedroom, i don't pay tax.

This was a good idea by the government but poorly executed. There are people being forced to downsize who categorically should not have to. However there are a lot of employed people who see long term unemployed in far grander houses than their own - this is demonstrably unfair and also demotivating to encourage people back to work.

The government is trying to widen the gap in living standards between those who choose to remain unemployed, and those who work. I'm not saying all the policies are correct, nor have they been correctly implemented, however i do admire the overall ambition.
No such thing as a bedroom tax, i'm employed and have a spare bedroom, i don't pay tax. This was a good idea by the government but poorly executed. There are people being forced to downsize who categorically should not have to. However there are a lot of employed people who see long term unemployed in far grander houses than their own - this is demonstrably unfair and also demotivating to encourage people back to work. The government is trying to widen the gap in living standards between those who choose to remain unemployed, and those who work. I'm not saying all the policies are correct, nor have they been correctly implemented, however i do admire the overall ambition. pablo26uk
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree