Social landlords respond to 'bedroom tax' concerns

WIRRAL’S social housing landlords are urging residents to get the advice they need as changes to their housing benefits draw near.

Tenants living in housing association properties will be faced with a “bedroom tax” from next April, meaning they will be charged for any spare bedrooms they have in their homes.

The changes, which fall under the Welfare Reform Act 2012, will mean a percentage of tenants’ housing benefit will be cut depending on how many empty bedrooms they have.

However, Wirral Partnership Homes’ assistant housing director John Mycock said he was keen to eliminate confusion among some residents that landlords are bumping up rent prices.

He said: “The Government have decided that anyone of working age who is in receipt of benefits is entitled to housing for their needs.

“So, a single person or a childless couple would only be given a one-bedroom home. Children of different sexes are expected to share until the age of ten while those of the same sex should share until 16.

“There has been some confusion with some people thinking their rent is going up but that is not the case – their benefits could be cut depending on their circumstances.”

According to the National Housing federation, the plans will affect couples who use their spare bedroom while recovering from illness or surgery; foster carers as foster children are not counted as part of the household for benefit purposes and families with disabled children.

The Government has said that cuts to housing benefit will be set at 14% for one extra bedroom and 25% for two or more extra bedrooms.

And Mr Mycock said it is vital that tenants ask for advice if they are unsure about any aspect of the changes.

He said: “The obvious challenge is that if people find they cannot afford the changes then how do we move them? There are a limited number of one bedroom flats available so we have to talk to people to discuss their individual circumstances.

“I think people are putting off dealing with it because it’s not until April but these changes are going to affect a lot of people so it is best to find out now.”

And Riverside Housing echoed Mr Mycock’s words and said they were in the process of speaking to tenants while Leasowe Community Homes visited residents to discuss the plans.

Neil Townsend, divisional director for Riverside, said: “We have written to almost 300 tenants on the Wirral, who are at risk of having their benefits cut as a result of the bedroom tax, and we’ve had a really good response.

“We want people to understand the options available to them.

"Tenants can chose to stay and pay, and top up the deficit on their housing benefit, or move to a house with fewer bedrooms. So far, just under half of those who responded want to move to a smaller property.

“While we fought hard to campaign against the bedroom tax, it will be implemented from next April. This is why we are offering support in money management from our team of specialist advisors, as well as energy saving tips to help tenants make their money go further.

“It’s important that tenants continue to pay their rent, as arrears may lead to them losing their home. We would urge those who have not responded to contact us if they are concerned about their circumstances. ”

Comments(12)

Lurkinhead says...
5:48pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Well well well Mr Mycock - still trying to "help" I see, but as far as I can see, not in any meaningful way!

The last paragraph, from the Riverside Housing spokesman echos the threat made to its tenants by WPH, and as Mr Mycock has already acknowledged, there is nowhere near the available stock held by social landlords to allow tenants to downsize within the social sector.

I doubt there is "confusion" with people by the way, because whether their rent is going up or whether their housing benefit is going down in essence, the net result is the same - i.e. making "affordable" housing unaffordable.

I'm sure rents will go up too, because slum landlords in the private sector will cash in on the misfortune of the displaced by using the increased demand of the evicted social tenants for smaller accommodation as a justification of hiking up their private rents, and for poor quality properties too. The consequence is that social landlords will then use whatever rent-setting mechanism they rely on, which factors in a comparison with private rents, to increase their social housing rents too.

Win / win for the housing associations, and lose / lose for the tenants, as far as I can see.

Mr Mycock, since you appear to be the WPH public lead on this, care to respond to the comments in relation to your previous letter, as so far, they have been conspicuous by their absence?


http://www.wirralglo
be.co.uk/yoursay/wir
ralletters/9996043.W
orking_hard_to_help_
Wirral_residents_aff
ected_by__bedroom_ta
x_/

EddieGremlin says...
6:58pm Mon 29 Oct 12

www.facebook.com/gro
ups/antibedroomtax/
Please paste this link into your chosen browser. If you have a facebook account you will be able to converse with REAL PEOPLE about this.

1. Wirral Partnership Homes should just TELL the CON-DEMS THIS WILL NOT WORK..

2. THEY SHOULD UNDERTAKE NOT TO EVICT ANYONE FALLING FOUL OF THIS EVIL TAX.

3. WE OURSELVES HAVE ASKED WPH SEVERAL TIMES FOR HELP. ITS FALLEN ON DEAF EARS.

"We're all in this together" we are told, what we see is "you're on your own"

don't look back in anger says...
7:18pm Mon 29 Oct 12

this tax is evil. it puts so much stress on people who may have lived in their property all their lives. pay up with money you don't have or get out. this is going back to the dark ages when they would take land from people etc. this government is brutal. in fact it's so bad, i think thatcher will end up voting labour.

Positive thinker says...
8:38pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Can't believe it's taken so long for the
goverment to implicate such measures,why should they pay for extra bedrooms,if you had to work to
pay the rent it would be a different story.Get real or get a job if you don't like it

don't look back in anger says...
9:31pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Positive thinker wrote:
Can't believe it's taken so long for the
goverment to implicate such measures,why should they pay for extra bedrooms,if you had to work to
pay the rent it would be a different story.Get real or get a job if you don't like it
i get up at 6am every morning to go to work and i have done for 15 years. in the past 3 years i have been struck by arthritis and i've had to have a hip replacement and i also have arthritis in my other hip and both knees which will eventually lead to a knee replacement. i will be lucky to work till i retire because of my health. so i become unemployed thru no fault of my own and then can't afford to live in my house that i've rented for 15 yrs from wph because i can't afford the bedroom tax. i've paid my own rent for 15 yrs and i've spent thousands of pounds of my hard earned money to improve my property over this time. when i'm kicked out, the next tennants could be the type that don't care about how they live, but they inherit a house that has been improved from top to bottom in and out. they move in just because they have a big enough family and then wreck what i worked most of my life for. do you think it's fair now. the bedroom tax aint all about people not having jobs, so they should be kicked out, cos i could lose my house thru no fault of my own after working hard for all i have. this bedroom tax worries me and i work and pay my taxes.

water1lily says...
5:55am Tue 30 Oct 12

From the social housing i've seen on Wirral it's not fit to live in. One tenant told me it had taken him 5 years to sort his house out. When people have spent money getting a property sorted it's unfair for them to have to move. The properties we have viewed haven't even been clean one nicotine stained property we were told we'd have to scrub! Wonky electrics, graffiti on walls, paint on tiles and floors,jungle gardens, everywhere in need of decoration I don't know how these social landlords get away with it. If there are no decent properties available to move to it's totally unfair to increase rents.

Lurkinhead says...
4:44pm Tue 30 Oct 12

EddieGremlin wrote:
www.facebook.com/gro

ups/antibedroomtax/
Please paste this link into your chosen browser. If you have a facebook account you will be able to converse with REAL PEOPLE about this.

1. Wirral Partnership Homes should just TELL the CON-DEMS THIS WILL NOT WORK..

2. THEY SHOULD UNDERTAKE NOT TO EVICT ANYONE FALLING FOUL OF THIS EVIL TAX.

3. WE OURSELVES HAVE ASKED WPH SEVERAL TIMES FOR HELP. ITS FALLEN ON DEAF EARS.

"We're all in this together" we are told, what we see is "you're on your own"
Great post EddieGremlin!

Is there any route into that protest movement for those of us who don't do facebook?

EddieGremlin says...
7:06pm Tue 30 Oct 12

Lurkinhead you can contact us via @antibedroomtax on twitter - We hope to have other web presence soon.

Lurkinhead says...
7:45pm Tue 30 Oct 12

Cheers Eddie.

I'm not a "tweeter" (is that right?) either, but have had a look at that link - some interesting stuff on there.

Particularly ironic was the article highlighting that foster parents would fall foul of the bedroom tax, but those with children away at boarding schools such as Eton & Harrow would not.

Seems to me that if the Tories say "We are all in this together", often enough, despite that most clearly not being the case, they expect that mantra to wear down the sections of society they are abusing, and who absolutely didn't cause the financial crisis by their reckless avarice & greed, to the extent that they will become acquiescent.

To my mind, we just can't let that happen, and the bedroom tax is just one example of their ideological attack on the poorer & more vulnerable members of society that can't go unchallenged.

Is there a national protest movement against the bedroom tax do you know?

Meanwhile, the social housing associations really do need to stand-up and be counted on this one, stand shoulder to shoulder with their tenants, and tell this government that enough is enough, and that they are not prepared to comply with this, even if this means creative workarounds such as re-designating what is defined as a bedroom, for example.

Whatever reassurances Mr Mycock, Mr Townsend, or any of the other social housing association people seek to provide, this will mean absolutely nothing if the reality is that they cravenly capitulate to the pernicious agenda of this government, and allow their tenants to be cast undeservingly onto life's scrapheap.

Social landlords - it's time to step up to the plate, show some courage, and palpably demonstrate that a desire for social justice is your defining characteristic!

Positive thinker says...
3:03pm Wed 31 Oct 12

Maybe extra bedrooms shouldn't have
Been given in the first instance,easy to give hard to take back

Bedroom Tax says...
6:06pm Wed 31 Oct 12

We are a Group on Facebook opposing this Tax and are growing in number and support and have a member with radio show air time ...https://www.faceb
ook.com/groups/53177
5566839406/

EddieGremlin says...
3:33pm Sat 10 Nov 12

Watch this space Lurkinhead! November 24th protest location to be announced - AGAINST ALL THE CUTS!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree