You do not have right of way in Wirral cycle lanes

IN a recent letter to the Globe, J Jackson-Ellis exhorts pedestrians to “keep out of his cycle lane” on the promenade passing Vale Park, accusing them of being ignorant because they stray between the white lines that mark the cycle route.

In fact, by making such a demand, Jackson-Ellis is assuming rights he simply does not have.

It is in fact he who is ignorant; ignorant of the legal situation pertaining to cycle lanes imposed on a public walkway.

The website “Cycling and the Law” clarifies this, warning that: "Cyclists must not assume they have the right of way on a shared-use facility".

According to the Ministry of Transport: "Cyclists should always show respect to pedestrians, even if they stray onto the cycling side; they are entitled to do so."

Official advice is that cyclists "always thank people who move out of the way."

Unfortunately, a number of our two-wheeled friends have moved a long way from any such behaviour.

Perhaps with its duty to health and safety, the council should take steps to inform prom-users of the ministry's words to stem the tide of reckless and rude behaviour we are now witnessing from an increasing number of cyclists.

For Jackson-Ellis is certainly right in one very important aspect.

There is an accident waiting to happen...

Ian Taylor, New Brighton.

Comments(3)

steady cyclist says...
1:54pm Tue 4 Sep 12

The ministry of transport no longer exists in england it has been superseeded a long time ago by a new department, so the rules you quote above are most probably out of date, and no longer relevant to cyclists and walkers and doggers who use the the prom to empty their dogs of pooh with absolutely no enforcement from the council.

I also see a lot of rude and reckless behaviour from the four wheeled brigade, who use a vehicle to travel to the prom, park where they like and leave their litter everywhere, perhaps the council should also enforce those rules.

Spiffy says...
3:13pm Mon 10 Sep 12

Wellll.....you can rely on having a "right" to save you from injury or even death OR you can stay the hell out of the way of something that *could* cause you injury or even death.
...
Depends on whether the primal survival instinct has been bred out of you and replaced with an over reliance on authority, I guess...

uncatom says...
5:00pm Mon 10 Sep 12

Faults on both sides sorry to say,but the cyclist has more potential to cause harm than the pedestrian,children are unpredictable and the prom being closed to motor traffic can lull people especially children and those with some disablement,deafness or blindness into a false sense of security so the keep out of the cycle lane letter writer needs to be a bit more tolerant of others.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree