Send us news by text, start your message Globe News and your send photos and videos to 80360
1:14pm Tuesday 31st January 2012 in Letters
I HAVE read your coverage of the Martin Morton story from the very beginning to present day and I cannot imagine what it must have been like for him to go into work under such circumstances, and I am delighted that he has been proved right.
However I still have a few concerns as to the final outcome and the current council leader Steve Foulkes.
I believe Cllr Foulkes has lost sight of the fact that this situation took place on his watch.
He allowed Mr Morton to be bullied out of his job, he allowed vulnerable adults to be overcharged by social services despite Mr Morton bringing this to the attention of his senior officers and, ultimately, he allowed the £40,000 "hush money" payment made to Mr Morton.
We are told that as a result of the Anna Kolonowski report senior officers in the social services department have resigned - but what about the Human Resources department and Steve Foulkes himself?
I believe he sees himself as part of the solution to right this despicable wrong.
However, I fail to see how this can be the case as he is ultimately responsible for it.
Whatever happened to the old belief of "the buck stops here"?
Brian Davis, Port Sunlight.
Comments(20)
council officer
says...
9:08pm Tue 31 Jan 12
Cheesy Peas
says...
10:26am Wed 1 Feb 12
council officer
says...
11:27am Wed 1 Feb 12
Cheesy Peas wrote:Can't argue with Cheesy Peas. However, looking around the Town Hall, don't expect any of the above doing the right thing anytime soon!
No, the buck should START with the council leader - swiftly followed by the chief executive and the mayor, the head of spin, and the various failed scrutiny committee chairpersons over the years.
And that's just for starters.
bickyboy
says...
9:42am Thu 2 Feb 12
pcs1980
says...
6:58pm Thu 2 Feb 12
Jimrob
says...
9:08pm Thu 2 Feb 12
council officer
says...
10:37pm Thu 2 Feb 12
Jimrob wrote:Very interesting Jimrob!
Smoke screen, smoke screen smoke screen!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The "Buck" should most definately NOT "stop with Wirral council leader".
Don't you get it?????
These elected councillors are all as thick as two short plankes. I doub't that if brains were dynamite, all of them put together, would have enough to blow a hat off.
JIM WILKIE RUNS WIRRAL!!!!
He has for the past 15 years. HE tells the elected members what to think, say and do.
Any SERIOUS investigation into this debarcle MUST start with Wilkie's involvement.
I can almost hear Wilkie's office shredder over-heating from where I sit and type this.
If we really want anything to change for the better in Wirral, WILKIE must be sacked.
council officer
says...
10:43pm Thu 2 Feb 12
bickyboy wrote:bickyboy....I think you will see alot more staff coming forward...eventually
Every large organisation has dead wood, and Wirral Council is clearly no exception. The difference here appears to be that firstly, the man at the top has adopted a limpet-like devotion to the power he wields, and secondly, that he has enthusiastically embraced the classic New Labour defence adopted by those politicians who are accused of failure and sleaze. This policy holds that if youre caught with your trousers down, you cling onto power, then repeat in a loud voice to anyone who will listen that "these trousers must never be allowed to fall down again" until people get fed up listening, leave you alone and let you Carry on Cocking Up. As for those employees in HR who are not fit for purpose, maybe an opportunity for fellow council officers to do some further whistle blowing whilst the iron is hot?
hugo2008
says...
9:48am Fri 3 Feb 12
Ben Beaconsfield
says...
11:37am Fri 3 Feb 12
hugo2008
says...
5:45pm Fri 3 Feb 12
council officer
says...
6:47pm Fri 3 Feb 12
hugo2008 wrote:The problem with the vote for the elected Mayor for Wirral was that only about 50 people responded and although the vote was for an elected Mayor, the sample was deemed to small to be recognised as safe.
Elected Mayor:
I think we have missed the boat, in the near future we are most probably going to get a "Merseyside Mayor" ruling both sides of the river.
We did have a vote once for an elected Mayor in Wirral, of the votes that were cast the majority actually wanted an elected Mayor, but Steve Foulkes overruled and ignored this democratic decision.
I would like to see all senior positions within the council open to elections, and an elected Mayor with full executive powers, charged with the task of vastly reducing the total cost of Wirral Borough Council, starting from the top.
An elected leader answerable to the population of Wirral who bother to vote, regardless of Party Politics.
After all it is our tax and rates that pay for it all, both those elected and employed, and we are not getting value for money.
Ben Beaconsfield
says...
7:05pm Fri 3 Feb 12
council officer
says...
7:23pm Fri 3 Feb 12
Ben Beaconsfield
says...
12:24pm Sat 4 Feb 12
daggers drawn
says...
2:16pm Sat 4 Feb 12
council officer wrote:I agree with all that has been said. I think I can hear them munching on lunch! and planning the next move! But I am yet to hear the movement of your new furniture!! Perhaps you best get back to McDonalds-I understand you started there! I rest my case!
Jimrob wrote: Smoke screen, smoke screen smoke screen!!!!!!!!!!!!! The "Buck" should most definately NOT "stop with Wirral council leader". Don't you get it????? These elected councillors are all as thick as two short plankes. I doub't that if brains were dynamite, all of them put together, would have enough to blow a hat off. JIM WILKIE RUNS WIRRAL!!!! He has for the past 15 years. HE tells the elected members what to think, say and do. Any SERIOUS investigation into this debarcle MUST start with Wilkie's involvement. I can almost hear Wilkie's office shredder over-heating from where I sit and type this. If we really want anything to change for the better in Wirral, WILKIE must be sacked.Very interesting Jimrob! I was under the impression that Mr Wilkie does nothing without first taking advice from the woman in the Ugg boots! If it was me, I would get rid of both of them.
daggers drawn
says...
2:27pm Sat 4 Feb 12
council officer wrote:Yep spot on with your post!! I would start with Wee Willie Wilkie & the elf-who between them are destroying this Council! Then I would look at each department starting with HR-I would get rid of the dead wood, clueless and brainless that would be a big budget saving!
Jimrob wrote: Smoke screen, smoke screen smoke screen!!!!!!!!!!!!! The "Buck" should most definately NOT "stop with Wirral council leader". Don't you get it????? These elected councillors are all as thick as two short plankes. I doub't that if brains were dynamite, all of them put together, would have enough to blow a hat off. JIM WILKIE RUNS WIRRAL!!!! He has for the past 15 years. HE tells the elected members what to think, say and do. Any SERIOUS investigation into this debarcle MUST start with Wilkie's involvement. I can almost hear Wilkie's office shredder over-heating from where I sit and type this. If we really want anything to change for the better in Wirral, WILKIE must be sacked.Very interesting Jimrob! I was under the impression that Mr Wilkie does nothing without first taking advice from the woman in the Ugg boots! If it was me, I would get rid of both of them.
bickyboy
says...
11:06am Sat 11 Feb 12
Ben Beaconsfield wrote:No response eh, Ben.
Not good enough, council officer. Your vagueness belies your non-de-plume.
Don't you have better access to the Legal Services Dept than most of us plebs? You made the assertion - you should now back it up with facts.
Ben Beaconsfield
says...
12:34pm Sat 11 Feb 12
Search for Jobs
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search for Homes
Search Now »
Search for Cars
Search Now »
wirralmum says...
1:41pm Tue 31 Jan 12
As for Steve Foulkes, I may be wrong, but I have a feeling that he would sell his own Granny to save his deceitful hide!