Councillors clash over low-paid workers' handout

Councillors clash over low-paid workers' handout Councillors clash over low-paid workers' handout

WIRRAL’S council leader has hit back at Liberal Democrat accusations that his group have “betrayed” the authority's lowest paid workers.

Councillor Phil Davies, Labour group leader, said the scrapping of a £250 handout to workers earning less than £21,000 per year was vital in order to tackle a massive budget overspend.

His comments come after Lib Dem councillor Stuart Kelly argued that Labour had a “moral duty” to ensure employees receive the cash.

He believes the decision to freeze the payments will have an impact on struggling families’ finances.

But Cllr Davies said the council had been forced to make the cuts because of a £15.3m overspend and invited Cllr Kelly to suggest where else savings could be made.

He told the Globe: “Due to the fact that the Government is slashing funding to local council’s, we can no longer afford to pay the £250 local pay award to staff earning less than £21,000 per year.

"The magnitude of the cuts that we are being forced to make is unprecedented and to implement this would cost around £1million. To put that into context, £1 million is the equivalent of about 55 salaries.

“This has been a difficult decision and I am obviously disappointed that we have been forced into this position.

“My message to Stuart Kelly is that if he wants to spend this money, he needs to tell me and the public how else he would make the necessary savings. It is irresponsible for the Liberal Democrats to ask to spend money on lots of items when they cannot come up with alternative suggestions.”

More than 5,000 of the council’s workers received the payment last year including school crossing patrols, youth workers and cleaners.

However Cllr Kelly said the removal of the handout would not be welcome news in the wake of senior managers being given “bumper pay-offs.”

He said: “Receiving this letter from the council in the same week that employees are reading about the bumper pay-offs awarded to senior managers recently under investigation must leave them feeling bewildered and under-valued.

“This payment was agreed in March this year and people will have made their plans expecting to receive it in October - I will be looking to persuade the Labour party they have a moral duty to ensure the money is paid.

“Labour often tell us they are on the side of low paid working people – no longer it seems.”

But the council leader said recent payments to chief officers would save the authority money in the future and also revealed plans to increase workers’ pay to a “living wage.”

Councillor Davies added: “The settlements that we have reached were agreed by all three party leaders so Cllr Kelly should speak to the Lib Dem group leader.

“In the long-term we will make savings and in the case of the director of finance, Ian Coleman, and the director of law, Bill Norman – those posts may well disappear as part of senior management restructuring.

He added: “However, despite a very difficult budget situation, this administration is committed to protecting the lowest paid. This December, we will become one of only a handful of councils in the country to become a Living Wage employer, guaranteeing all of our staff the UK Living Wage.

"We have already implemented the guidelines, meaning that all employees are now guaranteed the UK Living Wage of £7.20 per hour.

"This is a positive step at a crucial time, when the working poor are facing benefit cuts while struggling with rising bills so I hope that the rest of the public sector and other large employers in Wirral will follow suit.”


 

Comments(6)

Growl Tiger says...
12:13pm Mon 22 Oct 12

"Bill Norman's post may well disappear", but we were told it had already disappeared and that's why he couldn't return to work!

If his post still exists why has he received a redundancy payout?

Willow Sherbet says...
5:59pm Mon 22 Oct 12

Yeh, Knock it off Phil and go and pay the other Suspended Officers £600,000. How much has the Highways Cover up cost us so far?

1 - 3 Million+ How much did the Martin Morton case cost ?

Give the under paid their money!

Total Prat

spamfiend says...
6:23pm Mon 22 Oct 12

I wish I was earning around £21k a year!!!

Lucky if I pull in £11500 a year doing a 35 hour week with no overtime or double pay for weekends and bank holidays and certainly no bonuses even if I hit all my KPI's let alone a £250 extra payment because I am 'low paid', and what is this UK living wage of £7.20 an hour they are going to implement because this was the first time I ever heard of this scheme. If it is good enough for council employees as this is the hourly rate that is determined to be what people need to earn to provide a decent living standard, then why is it not implemented instead of the minimum wage or is it only good enough for council employees?

johnbrace says...
11:15pm Mon 22 Oct 12

Let's see the £250 was agreed for this financial year (2012/2013), so Cllr Phil Davies uses the reason of cuts in the 2013/2014 Budget as a reason?

Oh and Labour's Cabinet spending hundreds of thousands of pounds more than the agreed Budget (strangely enough a sum similar to that saved by axing the £250 low pay deal) would have nothing to with it?

And paying eight people to do four people's jobs after four directors were suspended, two apparently when there was "no case to answer"?

The truth is, Labour are the one party making these decisions as a Conservative/Lib Dem Budget was forced on them. Labour want to take out the bits they don't like and add the bits they do. Whereas I'm sure they can do that for 2013/2014, the 2012/2013 Budget shouldn't have been tampered with like this as it's bad for Labour's reputation to be seen as having to make cuts and get rid of people (Bill Norman and Ian Coleman are just the start) so the money can be instead spent on what they wanted (which wasn't originally in the agreed Budget!)

You can't spend money like it's going out of fashion, with yearly decreases to Budgets without causing massive problems later. So far the agreed Budget cuts for 2012/2013 have been a small percentage of what's required to make the books balance, the rest is so huge it'll result in people having to leave Wirral Council and services provided to the public suffering. Course Labour could decide to put up Council Tax next year to sort it out, but a double-digit% rise would be required to balance things and to get that would require a referendum....

bickyboy says...
7:11pm Fri 26 Oct 12

Last I heard they were pumping an extra £200k into the HR department, and presumably one of the most pressing tasks of that department will be to get low paid workers who don't get their 250 quid "on message".
Rotten Boroughs, anyone?

Positive thinker says...
9:19pm Fri 26 Oct 12

They should be grateful they have a job never mind the £250 bonus payment

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree