Council leader rages against Government cuts (From Wirral Globe)
Send us news by text, start your message Globe News and your send photos and videos to 80360
Council leader rages against Government cuts
11:10am Friday 19th October 2012 in News By Geoff Barnes
Council leader rages against Government cuts
Wirral’s senior politicians are demanding an urgent meeting with Local Government Secretary of State Eric Pickles over crippling budget cuts imposed by the Government.
Council leader Phil Davies raged: “The level of cuts that the people of Wirral face to their services is simply unacceptable in a civilised society.
"The projected Government funding that we will receive over the next three years is woefully inadequate – it represents a cut of around a third of our budgets.”
The council’s powerful cabinet has already ordered the pursuit of a range of options to keep spending in check, including the sharing of services with other councils and a “radical” reduction in senior management costs. All “non-essential” spending has also been frozen.
Councillor Davies warned however: “None of this will be enough to avoid painful choices unless the Government rethinks and provides additional funding.”
The council’s case for a rethink is backed up by a so-called Graph of Doom – an indicator of projected spending levels up to 2019/20.
It shows a drop from around £375m in 2010/11 to about £280m in eight years time. Whereas cash for social care for children and adults and spending on environmental services are shown with small variations, funding for all other services could be slashed by tens of millions of pounds.
Councillor Davies said: “We are not talking about potential cuts to what the Secretary of State would describe as ‘fripperies’ but rather the essential services some of the most vulnerable children and adults rely upon.
“I am absolutely committed to involving and consulting with Wirral people as we seek to challenge the dreadful budget situation before us.
“However my challenge to the Secretary of State is that, if we truly are ‘all in this together,’ then he needs to demonstrate how he will mitigate the pain of cuts to services for local residents, particularly those who need our help the most.”
The local authority has distributed 40,000 consultation forms to families across the borough to help councillors to decide where the spending axe should fall.
People are asked their opinions on their highest and lowest priorities and whether fees should be increases for certain chargeable services.
The survey asks whether the council should consider outsourcing or sharing some local services with other organisations and which, if any, services should be stopped or reduced.
The results of the survey will be used to develop specific options for achieving the savings that the authority has to make.
Further consultations will then take place to gather views on the options before final decisions are made on how the savings will be found.
Comments(23)
Uncle_Fester
says...
11:42am Fri 19 Oct 12
WirralAl
says...
11:46am Fri 19 Oct 12
unbeleivable wrote:Could not agree more. But the savings that are required are beyond practical even for WBC. Perhaps the entire wage bill of the council would be £100,000,000 so do they recommend that we no longer need a council at all. Which is some what fool hardy.
Stop giving the councils money to suspended officers.
Hugo1008
says...
12:17pm Fri 19 Oct 12
What is foolhardy about not needing a council, what we do need is a dedicated small group of Leaders who would first and formost put the interests of the local population as their prime objective, regardless of Party Politics.
Point Two:
The present Coalition Government have made swinging cuts to all Councils and many other over beurocratic organisations throughout the Country,
What makes it worse for Wirral is the absolute shambles and utter disgrace that Wirral Local Government have made over the past twenty years or more with dreadful wasteage, illegal management, scandalous coverups, malpractice, misinformation, and corrupt secrecy, and this is still going on today with concealed information and a lack of transparency from top to bottom, and all that is the direct responsibility of the so called elected Councillors, not being fit for the job.
Point Three: If the electorate of Wirral do not wake up and smell the coffee this level of bad management is bound to continue, with or without financial impositions from the National Government whatever Political Party is in power, we as the voting population on Wirral need to clean up our own house right now.
So remember when you do get a chance to vote just what a disgrace the present bunch of 66 parasites for the most part have been up to for the last two decades.
Ben Beaconsfield
says...
12:25pm Fri 19 Oct 12
This will save around a quarter of a million pounds a year - not a lot, perhaps, but it would show willing.
Dantealighieri
says...
12:28pm Fri 19 Oct 12
council officer
says...
12:36pm Fri 19 Oct 12
Ben Beaconsfield wrote:May I suggest that all the free parking around the Wallasey Town Hall is scrapped and staff and visitors pay a small fee. Not a lot, but another brick in the wall!
Why not start by cutting by 25% the money councillors pay themselves?
This will save around a quarter of a million pounds a year - not a lot, perhaps, but it would show willing.
red devil
says...
3:43pm Fri 19 Oct 12
johnhardaker
says...
3:57pm Fri 19 Oct 12
0.00 \Payoffs to useless officers £800.000.00approx travelling allowances to council staff twice the uk average ,reports by outside bodies £500.000.00 approx Paying off 3 chief executives in two years over £500.000.00,interes
t lost in putting deposits with icelandic banks,payoffs to senior DASS officers,Cheshire lines unchecked spending £12,000.000.00 £632,000.00 DASS overspend,£3.400.00
0.00 parking contract to NSL parking wardens,Plus a £40.000.000.00 overpriced contract to Colas.All under the labour party watch I believe, the list is endless no wonder the government are trying to stop this gross mismanagement & I use the word management in the most loose sense as far as I can see Wirral Council deserves the title a Really Rotten Borough,god help the hard working staff in most departments who are ruled by the clowns in Brighton Street.
don't look back in anger
says...
6:43pm Fri 19 Oct 12
Hugo1008 wrote:before i even read half of this comment,i guessed you vote tory. i wonder if i'm correct?
Point One:
What is foolhardy about not needing a council, what we do need is a dedicated small group of Leaders who would first and formost put the interests of the local population as their prime objective, regardless of Party Politics.
Point Two:
The present Coalition Government have made swinging cuts to all Councils and many other over beurocratic organisations throughout the Country,
What makes it worse for Wirral is the absolute shambles and utter disgrace that Wirral Local Government have made over the past twenty years or more with dreadful wasteage, illegal management, scandalous coverups, malpractice, misinformation, and corrupt secrecy, and this is still going on today with concealed information and a lack of transparency from top to bottom, and all that is the direct responsibility of the so called elected Councillors, not being fit for the job.
Point Three: If the electorate of Wirral do not wake up and smell the coffee this level of bad management is bound to continue, with or without financial impositions from the National Government whatever Political Party is in power, we as the voting population on Wirral need to clean up our own house right now.
So remember when you do get a chance to vote just what a disgrace the present bunch of 66 parasites for the most part have been up to for the last two decades.
craigot89
says...
8:03pm Fri 19 Oct 12
Uncle_Fester wrote:Labour did not cause the international financial crisis. Maybe you should put down Cameron's script and find out for yourself what really caused the problems we face. As for Phil Davies the village idiot, am I right in saying he was refering to union members as living in cloud cuckoo land for opposing the cuts. Has the penny finally dropped for this fool that by passing on these cuts without any resistance he is merely playing into the hands of the tories. So while Jeff Green has his feet up taking shots at the labour council through local media, Phil Davies looks like the hatchet man and has to deal with the public backlash from tory cuts. Mug
So now local Labour are complaining that the government are having to make cuts to sort out the mess that the previous "Labour" government made.....Priceless!! This council seriously worries me.
Witch Finder General 2
says...
8:58pm Fri 19 Oct 12
water1lily
says...
2:50am Sat 20 Oct 12
Ben Beaconsfield
says...
9:39am Sat 20 Oct 12
craigot89 wrote:Let's not start creating a myth that somehow the Tories conspired to lose control at the last council elections.
Uncle_Fester wrote:Labour did not cause the international financial crisis. Maybe you should put down Cameron's script and find out for yourself what really caused the problems we face. As for Phil Davies the village idiot, am I right in saying he was refering to union members as living in cloud cuckoo land for opposing the cuts. Has the penny finally dropped for this fool that by passing on these cuts without any resistance he is merely playing into the hands of the tories. So while Jeff Green has his feet up taking shots at the labour council through local media, Phil Davies looks like the hatchet man and has to deal with the public backlash from tory cuts. Mug
So now local Labour are complaining that the government are having to make cuts to sort out the mess that the previous "Labour" government made.....Priceless!! This council seriously worries me.
The truth is that Jeff Green and his 'media advisor' threw it away.
David Scott
says...
6:09pm Sat 20 Oct 12
bickyboy
says...
7:13pm Sat 20 Oct 12
Will councillors head en masse down to Whitehall and chain themselves to the railings outside Downing Street, demanding to be given a Plebs' Hearing, and refusing to leave until the PM agrees to a realistic cuts agenda instead of a slash and burn demolition job on those who can least afford it? Will the 66 make the ghost of Wat Tyler proud?
I'd be so impressed if they did.
johnbrace
says...
3:46pm Tue 23 Oct 12
RL 1952
says...
12:48pm Wed 24 Oct 12
johnhardaker wrote:This report is spot but Phil Davies again treats the public as idiots and attempts to hoodwink them into believeing it is all the Governments doing. The labour group has done irreparable damage to Wirral and are still following the same poor management that has created this mess, the mismanagement goes on and on and everyone else is to blame, come on Cllr Davies wake up and smell the coffee you and your party colleagues are the problem not in any part the solution.
Phil Davies,think on the monies you paid out to a bankrupt contractor for the west kirby marine lake £750.000.00,the £1.400.000.00 extras to Colas, councilors allowances£1.200.00
0.00 \Payoffs to useless officers £800.000.00approx travelling allowances to council staff twice the uk average ,reports by outside bodies £500.000.00 approx Paying off 3 chief executives in two years over £500.000.00,interes
t lost in putting deposits with icelandic banks,payoffs to senior DASS officers,Cheshire lines unchecked spending £12,000.000.00 £632,000.00 DASS overspend,£3.400.00
0.00 parking contract to NSL parking wardens,Plus a £40.000.000.00 overpriced contract to Colas.All under the labour party watch I believe, the list is endless no wonder the government are trying to stop this gross mismanagement & I use the word management in the most loose sense as far as I can see Wirral Council deserves the title a Really Rotten Borough,god help the hard working staff in most departments who are ruled by the clowns in Brighton Street.
kevin casey
says...
12:52pm Thu 25 Oct 12
through greed, corruption, mismangement abuse they should round all the clowns up and ship the to billy smarts circus!!! then elect a small group
of commited people who actually give a **** about the people of wirral !!
bickyboy
says...
6:00pm Thu 25 Oct 12
I don't entirely blame Labour for this, actually. As in the days of Thatcher, Tory policy towards local government settlements isn't simply about austerity measures to deal with the budget deficit: it's about throwing Labour-controlled local authorities into crisis in areas where the Tories tend not to do so well, in the forlorn hope that the working class will be dumb enough to change the knee-jerk voting habits of a lifetime and choose a Tory instead.
ook at the self satisfied sneer on the face of George Osborne and ask yourself this, in all seriousness: is that the face of a man you would trust with the future of Britain's poor?
bickyboy
says...
6:01pm Thu 25 Oct 12
craigot89
says...
6:19pm Fri 26 Oct 12
Ben Beaconsfield wrote:Talk about putting words in my mouth! I did not suggest they purposely threw away the election. I am making the point that by passing on these cuts without resistance they are just the same as the Tories. If anyone's creating myths it's you.
craigot89 wrote:Let's not start creating a myth that somehow the Tories conspired to lose control at the last council elections.
Uncle_Fester wrote:Labour did not cause the international financial crisis. Maybe you should put down Cameron's script and find out for yourself what really caused the problems we face. As for Phil Davies the village idiot, am I right in saying he was refering to union members as living in cloud cuckoo land for opposing the cuts. Has the penny finally dropped for this fool that by passing on these cuts without any resistance he is merely playing into the hands of the tories. So while Jeff Green has his feet up taking shots at the labour council through local media, Phil Davies looks like the hatchet man and has to deal with the public backlash from tory cuts. Mug
So now local Labour are complaining that the government are having to make cuts to sort out the mess that the previous "Labour" government made.....Priceless!! This council seriously worries me.
The truth is that Jeff Green and his 'media advisor' threw it away.
Hugo1008
says...
8:25pm Sat 27 Oct 12
ger:
Wonder no more, If you had been up to date, or read any of my posts in the past
You would understand better.
I actually voted for Tony Blair the first time round, then I realised he was even worse than Maggie Thatcher, after that I woud never vote for any of the so called three main parties again.
On a local level I am surprised that the National Labour Party allow this corrupt and disgraced group to use the title Labour, they bring he whole meaning of Party Politics in Local Government into absolute disgrace.
That is why I would like to scrap the whole 66 Council Parasites once and for all.
We in Wirral deserve some clean honest open fair peoples representatives and good clean fair management for a change.
unbeleivable says...
11:21am Fri 19 Oct 12