Council leader rages against Government cuts

Council leader rages against Government cuts Council leader rages against Government cuts

Wirral’s senior politicians are demanding an urgent meeting with Local Government Secretary of State Eric Pickles over crippling budget cuts imposed by the Government.

Council leader Phil Davies raged: “The level of cuts that the people of Wirral face to their services is simply unacceptable in a civilised society.

"The projected Government funding that we will receive over the next three years is woefully inadequate – it represents a cut of around a third of our budgets.”

The council’s powerful cabinet has already ordered the pursuit of a range of options to keep spending in check, including the sharing of services with other councils and a “radical” reduction in senior management costs. All “non-essential” spending has also been frozen.

Councillor Davies warned however: “None of this will be enough to avoid painful choices unless the Government rethinks and provides additional funding.”

The council’s case for a rethink is backed up by a so-called Graph of Doom – an indicator of projected spending levels up to 2019/20.

It shows a drop from around £375m in 2010/11 to about £280m in eight years time. Whereas cash for social care for children and adults and spending on environmental services are shown with small variations, funding for all other services could be slashed by tens of millions of pounds.

Councillor Davies said: “We are not talking about potential cuts to what the Secretary of State would describe as ‘fripperies’ but rather the essential services some of the most vulnerable children and adults rely upon.

“I am absolutely committed to involving and consulting with Wirral people as we seek to challenge the dreadful budget situation before us.

“However my challenge to the Secretary of State is that, if we truly are ‘all in this together,’ then he needs to demonstrate how he will mitigate the pain of cuts to services for local residents, particularly those who need our help the most.”

The local authority has distributed 40,000 consultation forms to families across the borough to help councillors to decide where the spending axe should fall.

People are asked their opinions on their highest and lowest priorities and whether fees should be increases for certain chargeable services. 

The survey asks whether the council should consider outsourcing or sharing some local services with other organisations and which, if any, services should be stopped or reduced.

The results of the survey will be used to develop specific options for achieving the savings that the authority has to make.

Further consultations will then take place to gather views on the options before final decisions are made on how the savings will be found.

Comments(23)

unbeleivable says...
11:21am Fri 19 Oct 12

Stop giving the councils money to suspended officers.

Uncle_Fester says...
11:42am Fri 19 Oct 12

So now local Labour are complaining that the government are having to make cuts to sort out the mess that the previous "Labour" government made.....Priceless!! This council seriously worries me.

WirralAl says...
11:46am Fri 19 Oct 12

unbeleivable wrote:
Stop giving the councils money to suspended officers.
Could not agree more. But the savings that are required are beyond practical even for WBC. Perhaps the entire wage bill of the council would be £100,000,000 so do they recommend that we no longer need a council at all. Which is some what fool hardy.

Hugo1008 says...
12:17pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Point One:
What is foolhardy about not needing a council, what we do need is a dedicated small group of Leaders who would first and formost put the interests of the local population as their prime objective, regardless of Party Politics.

Point Two:
The present Coalition Government have made swinging cuts to all Councils and many other over beurocratic organisations throughout the Country,

What makes it worse for Wirral is the absolute shambles and utter disgrace that Wirral Local Government have made over the past twenty years or more with dreadful wasteage, illegal management, scandalous coverups, malpractice, misinformation, and corrupt secrecy, and this is still going on today with concealed information and a lack of transparency from top to bottom, and all that is the direct responsibility of the so called elected Councillors, not being fit for the job.

Point Three: If the electorate of Wirral do not wake up and smell the coffee this level of bad management is bound to continue, with or without financial impositions from the National Government whatever Political Party is in power, we as the voting population on Wirral need to clean up our own house right now.

So remember when you do get a chance to vote just what a disgrace the present bunch of 66 parasites for the most part have been up to for the last two decades.

Ben Beaconsfield says...
12:25pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Why not start by cutting by 25% the money councillors pay themselves?

This will save around a quarter of a million pounds a year - not a lot, perhaps, but it would show willing.

Dantealighieri says...
12:28pm Fri 19 Oct 12

".........gather views on options.. blah blah blah ... on how savings can be found". Here's one for starters. Stop giving Tranmere Rovers £125,000 a year.

council officer says...
12:36pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Ben Beaconsfield wrote:
Why not start by cutting by 25% the money councillors pay themselves?

This will save around a quarter of a million pounds a year - not a lot, perhaps, but it would show willing.
May I suggest that all the free parking around the Wallasey Town Hall is scrapped and staff and visitors pay a small fee. Not a lot, but another brick in the wall!

red devil says...
3:43pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Distraction! distraction! distraction! Lets blame the government and distract the fools from the real reasons we have no monbey but can give big payouts to ex scoundrels.

johnhardaker says...
3:57pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Phil Davies,think on the monies you paid out to a bankrupt contractor for the west kirby marine lake £750.000.00,the £1.400.000.00 extras to Colas, councilors allowances£1.200.00
0.00 \Payoffs to useless officers £800.000.00approx travelling allowances to council staff twice the uk average ,reports by outside bodies £500.000.00 approx Paying off 3 chief executives in two years over £500.000.00,interes
t lost in putting deposits with icelandic banks,payoffs to senior DASS officers,Cheshire lines unchecked spending £12,000.000.00 £632,000.00 DASS overspend,£3.400.00
0.00 parking contract to NSL parking wardens,Plus a £40.000.000.00 overpriced contract to Colas.All under the labour party watch I believe, the list is endless no wonder the government are trying to stop this gross mismanagement & I use the word management in the most loose sense as far as I can see Wirral Council deserves the title a Really Rotten Borough,god help the hard working staff in most departments who are ruled by the clowns in Brighton Street.

don't look back in anger says...
6:43pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Hugo1008 wrote:
Point One:
What is foolhardy about not needing a council, what we do need is a dedicated small group of Leaders who would first and formost put the interests of the local population as their prime objective, regardless of Party Politics.

Point Two:
The present Coalition Government have made swinging cuts to all Councils and many other over beurocratic organisations throughout the Country,

What makes it worse for Wirral is the absolute shambles and utter disgrace that Wirral Local Government have made over the past twenty years or more with dreadful wasteage, illegal management, scandalous coverups, malpractice, misinformation, and corrupt secrecy, and this is still going on today with concealed information and a lack of transparency from top to bottom, and all that is the direct responsibility of the so called elected Councillors, not being fit for the job.

Point Three: If the electorate of Wirral do not wake up and smell the coffee this level of bad management is bound to continue, with or without financial impositions from the National Government whatever Political Party is in power, we as the voting population on Wirral need to clean up our own house right now.

So remember when you do get a chance to vote just what a disgrace the present bunch of 66 parasites for the most part have been up to for the last two decades.
before i even read half of this comment,i guessed you vote tory. i wonder if i'm correct?

craigot89 says...
8:03pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Uncle_Fester wrote:
So now local Labour are complaining that the government are having to make cuts to sort out the mess that the previous "Labour" government made.....Priceless!! This council seriously worries me.
Labour did not cause the international financial crisis. Maybe you should put down Cameron's script and find out for yourself what really caused the problems we face. As for Phil Davies the village idiot, am I right in saying he was refering to union members as living in cloud cuckoo land for opposing the cuts. Has the penny finally dropped for this fool that by passing on these cuts without any resistance he is merely playing into the hands of the tories. So while Jeff Green has his feet up taking shots at the labour council through local media, Phil Davies looks like the hatchet man and has to deal with the public backlash from tory cuts. Mug

Witch Finder General 2 says...
8:58pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Do we really need three councillors per ward,Liberals now lost in the'wilderness' . Three councillors Bidston all Labour three councillors Eastham ,Liberals reduce 66 to 33 .That will save money on allowances ,additional payments for being the chair of Scrutiny Committees and travel expenses.

water1lily says...
2:50am Sat 20 Oct 12

If the coucil want to make pots of money why don't they start by sorting the traffic chaos around schools at 09.00 and 15.00 fining all the parents parking illegally on pavements, grass verges, causing obstructions, they could make a fortune and maybe also save a childs life.

Ben Beaconsfield says...
9:39am Sat 20 Oct 12

craigot89 wrote:
Uncle_Fester wrote:
So now local Labour are complaining that the government are having to make cuts to sort out the mess that the previous "Labour" government made.....Priceless!! This council seriously worries me.
Labour did not cause the international financial crisis. Maybe you should put down Cameron's script and find out for yourself what really caused the problems we face. As for Phil Davies the village idiot, am I right in saying he was refering to union members as living in cloud cuckoo land for opposing the cuts. Has the penny finally dropped for this fool that by passing on these cuts without any resistance he is merely playing into the hands of the tories. So while Jeff Green has his feet up taking shots at the labour council through local media, Phil Davies looks like the hatchet man and has to deal with the public backlash from tory cuts. Mug
Let's not start creating a myth that somehow the Tories conspired to lose control at the last council elections.

The truth is that Jeff Green and his 'media advisor' threw it away.

David Scott says...
6:09pm Sat 20 Oct 12

A straightforward willingness to find economies and cut waste would be a lot more productive than a 'consultation' spin exercise. As has been said by others, there are many relatively minor savings that could be made, and they would add up to a tidy sum.

bickyboy says...
7:13pm Sat 20 Oct 12

At last, they're making the right noises. Will they follow them up with the right actions?
Will councillors head en masse down to Whitehall and chain themselves to the railings outside Downing Street, demanding to be given a Plebs' Hearing, and refusing to leave until the PM agrees to a realistic cuts agenda instead of a slash and burn demolition job on those who can least afford it? Will the 66 make the ghost of Wat Tyler proud?
I'd be so impressed if they did.

johnbrace says...
3:46pm Tue 23 Oct 12

Well under the Wirral Council expenses system, Cllr Phil Davies gets his travel expenses to and from seeing government ministers to lobby on behalf of Wirral Council, only if he invites the other political parties along. Let's face it train fare to London and back isn't cheap!

RL 1952 says...
12:48pm Wed 24 Oct 12

johnhardaker wrote:
Phil Davies,think on the monies you paid out to a bankrupt contractor for the west kirby marine lake £750.000.00,the £1.400.000.00 extras to Colas, councilors allowances£1.200.00

0.00 \Payoffs to useless officers £800.000.00approx travelling allowances to council staff twice the uk average ,reports by outside bodies £500.000.00 approx Paying off 3 chief executives in two years over £500.000.00,interes

t lost in putting deposits with icelandic banks,payoffs to senior DASS officers,Cheshire lines unchecked spending £12,000.000.00 £632,000.00 DASS overspend,£3.400.00

0.00 parking contract to NSL parking wardens,Plus a £40.000.000.00 overpriced contract to Colas.All under the labour party watch I believe, the list is endless no wonder the government are trying to stop this gross mismanagement & I use the word management in the most loose sense as far as I can see Wirral Council deserves the title a Really Rotten Borough,god help the hard working staff in most departments who are ruled by the clowns in Brighton Street.
This report is spot but Phil Davies again treats the public as idiots and attempts to hoodwink them into believeing it is all the Governments doing. The labour group has done irreparable damage to Wirral and are still following the same poor management that has created this mess, the mismanagement goes on and on and everyone else is to blame, come on Cllr Davies wake up and smell the coffee you and your party colleagues are the problem not in any part the solution.

kevin casey says...
12:52pm Thu 25 Oct 12

it is quite obvious all parties who have had control over the last 12 years have systematically bled the public purse
through greed, corruption, mismangement abuse they should round all the clowns up and ship the to billy smarts circus!!! then elect a small group
of commited people who actually give a **** about the people of wirral !!

bickyboy says...
6:00pm Thu 25 Oct 12

Rage, rage against the dying of the budget.
I don't entirely blame Labour for this, actually. As in the days of Thatcher, Tory policy towards local government settlements isn't simply about austerity measures to deal with the budget deficit: it's about throwing Labour-controlled local authorities into crisis in areas where the Tories tend not to do so well, in the forlorn hope that the working class will be dumb enough to change the knee-jerk voting habits of a lifetime and choose a Tory instead.
ook at the self satisfied sneer on the face of George Osborne and ask yourself this, in all seriousness: is that the face of a man you would trust with the future of Britain's poor?

bickyboy says...
6:01pm Thu 25 Oct 12

Ook....good word but not the right one. LOOK at the self satisfied...etc etc..

craigot89 says...
6:19pm Fri 26 Oct 12

Ben Beaconsfield wrote:
craigot89 wrote:
Uncle_Fester wrote:
So now local Labour are complaining that the government are having to make cuts to sort out the mess that the previous "Labour" government made.....Priceless!! This council seriously worries me.
Labour did not cause the international financial crisis. Maybe you should put down Cameron's script and find out for yourself what really caused the problems we face. As for Phil Davies the village idiot, am I right in saying he was refering to union members as living in cloud cuckoo land for opposing the cuts. Has the penny finally dropped for this fool that by passing on these cuts without any resistance he is merely playing into the hands of the tories. So while Jeff Green has his feet up taking shots at the labour council through local media, Phil Davies looks like the hatchet man and has to deal with the public backlash from tory cuts. Mug
Let's not start creating a myth that somehow the Tories conspired to lose control at the last council elections.

The truth is that Jeff Green and his 'media advisor' threw it away.
Talk about putting words in my mouth! I did not suggest they purposely threw away the election. I am making the point that by passing on these cuts without resistance they are just the same as the Tories. If anyone's creating myths it's you.

Hugo1008 says...
8:25pm Sat 27 Oct 12

dont-look-back-in-an
ger:

Wonder no more, If you had been up to date, or read any of my posts in the past
You would understand better.

I actually voted for Tony Blair the first time round, then I realised he was even worse than Maggie Thatcher, after that I woud never vote for any of the so called three main parties again.

On a local level I am surprised that the National Labour Party allow this corrupt and disgraced group to use the title Labour, they bring he whole meaning of Party Politics in Local Government into absolute disgrace.

That is why I would like to scrap the whole 66 Council Parasites once and for all.

We in Wirral deserve some clean honest open fair peoples representatives and good clean fair management for a change.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree