Councillor's warning Birkenhead faces 'years of dereliction' sparks backlash

CLAIMS that Birkenhead could be condemned to “years of dereliction” because of a proposed house-building policy change have been slapped down by the ruling Labour group.

Liberal Democrat Cllr Stuart Kelly insisted that plans to lift the council’s housing restraint policy – targeting regeneration priority areas for new homes – were ill-thought out.

He claimed it would see developers “scrambling to buy up plots of lands and build their luxury flats in settled residential areas while abandoning those areas of desperate need of housing and development.”

And he warned: “If we allow this change to go ahead we will be abandoning parts of Birkenhead to years of dereliction.”

Councillor Pat Hackett, cabinet member for regeneration and planning strategy, challenged Cllr Kelly to “get his facts right.”

He said the council’s ongoing programmes would continue to support regeneration of key urban sites and if the Green Belt was to continue to be protected, more areas for housing areas needed to be identified.

Councillor Hackett added: “The borough does not now have enough housing land to meet the national requirement in the national planning policy framework to provide a five year supply of specific deliverable sites.

“The latest housing assessment shows that this cannot be achieved without removing the additional restrictions of the interim planning policy, to enable other sites within the existing urban area to contribute.

“If the council does not maintain an appropriate five-year supply, it is likely to lose planning appeals and could have costs awarded against it for unreasonable behaviour. “The emerging core strategy would be considered unsound and a planning inspector may require a review of the Green Belt to be undertaken immediately.

"The only way to prevent this happening is to remove the interim planning policy, to enable the supply of housing land to increase.”

Councillor Hackett added: “I would encourage Cllr Kelly to work in a constructive manner through the democratic channels and the ongoing six- week consultation.

"He and his colleagues also need to challenge his Government that is pushing through these changes that we all have to work with.”

Comments(12)

WirralAl says...
3:10pm Mon 8 Oct 12

Breaking News! Birkenhead has been in a state of dereliction for years and it you lot that need to rebuild it into a nice place to live.

At present it is such a waste land of urban decay and neglect.

Positive thinker says...
4:48pm Mon 8 Oct 12

The building ban was
put in place many years ago long before the economical downturn,developers had many years of sunshine building never took place does that not prove a point.Changing the planning policy may kick start the house building buisness which is needed,applications no doubt will still have to go through the strict procedure

Positive thinker says...
4:53pm Mon 8 Oct 12

Sorry Councillor Hackett forgot to say its a Big YES from me

uncatom says...
4:57pm Mon 8 Oct 12

Must be due a decision on Ingleborough, how very convenient

Positive thinker says...
5:52pm Mon 8 Oct 12

Ingleborough was never effected by
the original Moratorium

Wirral_Man says...
1:03pm Tue 9 Oct 12

Maybe if the council made some asort of effort to make the re-develoment areas in Birkenhead more attractive places to live, the developers would be able to sell houses there and would be interested in buying up land.

Instead we have plots of empty land covered in rubbish, burnt out cars and owned by Scallies - some law enforcement, rubbish clearing and basic gardening might help?

Positive thinker says...
6:07pm Tue 9 Oct 12

Scallies own land !

Spiffy says...
8:41pm Tue 9 Oct 12

"...He claimed it would see developers “scrambling to buy up plots of lands and build their luxury flats in settled residential areas while abandoning those areas of desperate need of housing and development.” ...."
...
Golly gosh ! How very DARE they have the freedom to build houses wherever the the law *allows* them to....they must ONLY build houses wherever Cllr Kelly *tells* them to !
...
There's nowt so right-wing fascist as a left-wing liberal...

Wirral_Man says...
8:31am Wed 10 Oct 12

"Golly gosh ! How very DARE they have the freedom to build houses wherever the the law *allows* them to....they must ONLY build houses wherever Cllr Kelly *tells* them to !"


For once I agree with the "right-wing facist leftie" what we don't want is a Wirral with the big urban areas with their hearts ripped out and new housing built on the few remaining green spaces to the west. Urban sprawl from Mersey to Dee anyone?

Spiffy says...
10:30am Wed 10 Oct 12

Wirral_Man wrote:
"Golly gosh ! How very DARE they have the freedom to build houses wherever the the law *allows* them to....they must ONLY build houses wherever Cllr Kelly *tells* them to !"


For once I agree with the "right-wing facist leftie" what we don't want is a Wirral with the big urban areas with their hearts ripped out and new housing built on the few remaining green spaces to the west. Urban sprawl from Mersey to Dee anyone?
You're missing the point. Houses are needed...and allowed to be built in both areas ...( settled residential areas & those areas of desperate need of housing and development, as quoted...)...but Cllr Kelly seems to think he alone should be able to choose where a property developer can invest his time, money and expertise.
...
Not "should" but "can". It's all in the language if you look.
...
Very free with other people's stuff, isn't he.

kevin casey says...
12:26pm Wed 10 Oct 12

why on earth invest in new build houses !! they cannot look after the ones they built like the woodchurch they
will spend no money at all here but can throw money in sponsership to football clubs and golf clubs they need to get a grip and listen to all the residents of wirral ! the woodchurch residents are treated like peasants (sack the lot and start again with people who give a ****

Positive thinker says...
5:06pm Wed 10 Oct 12

It's not a case of the council building the houses,they are lifting the moratorium in order for private developers to build in area's covered
by the present moratorium

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree