- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@WIRRALGLOBENEWS
All the latest news and views from the Wirral Globe
- Find us on Facebook
Wirral Globe
Like us on Facebook
Councillor's warning Birkenhead faces 'years of dereliction' sparks backlash (From Wirral Globe)
Send us news by text, start your message Globe News and your send photos and videos to 80360
Councillor's warning Birkenhead faces 'years of dereliction' sparks backlash
2:22pm Monday 8th October 2012 in News Exclusive By Geoff Barnes
CLAIMS that Birkenhead could be condemned to “years of dereliction” because of a proposed house-building policy change have been slapped down by the ruling Labour group.
Liberal Democrat Cllr Stuart Kelly insisted that plans to lift the council’s housing restraint policy – targeting regeneration priority areas for new homes – were ill-thought out.
He claimed it would see developers “scrambling to buy up plots of lands and build their luxury flats in settled residential areas while abandoning those areas of desperate need of housing and development.”
And he warned: “If we allow this change to go ahead we will be abandoning parts of Birkenhead to years of dereliction.”
Councillor Pat Hackett, cabinet member for regeneration and planning strategy, challenged Cllr Kelly to “get his facts right.”
He said the council’s ongoing programmes would continue to support regeneration of key urban sites and if the Green Belt was to continue to be protected, more areas for housing areas needed to be identified.
Councillor Hackett added: “The borough does not now have enough housing land to meet the national requirement in the national planning policy framework to provide a five year supply of specific deliverable sites.
“The latest housing assessment shows that this cannot be achieved without removing the additional restrictions of the interim planning policy, to enable other sites within the existing urban area to contribute.
“If the council does not maintain an appropriate five-year supply, it is likely to lose planning appeals and could have costs awarded against it for unreasonable behaviour. “The emerging core strategy would be considered unsound and a planning inspector may require a review of the Green Belt to be undertaken immediately.
"The only way to prevent this happening is to remove the interim planning policy, to enable the supply of housing land to increase.”
Councillor Hackett added: “I would encourage Cllr Kelly to work in a constructive manner through the democratic channels and the ongoing six- week consultation.
"He and his colleagues also need to challenge his Government that is pushing through these changes that we all have to work with.”
Comments(12)
Positive thinker
says...
4:48pm Mon 8 Oct 12
put in place many years ago long before the economical downturn,developers had many years of sunshine building never took place does that not prove a point.Changing the planning policy may kick start the house building buisness which is needed,applications no doubt will still have to go through the strict procedure
Positive thinker
says...
4:53pm Mon 8 Oct 12
uncatom
says...
4:57pm Mon 8 Oct 12
Positive thinker
says...
5:52pm Mon 8 Oct 12
the original Moratorium
Wirral_Man
says...
1:03pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Instead we have plots of empty land covered in rubbish, burnt out cars and owned by Scallies - some law enforcement, rubbish clearing and basic gardening might help?
Positive thinker
says...
6:07pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Spiffy
says...
8:41pm Tue 9 Oct 12
...
Golly gosh ! How very DARE they have the freedom to build houses wherever the the law *allows* them to....they must ONLY build houses wherever Cllr Kelly *tells* them to !
...
There's nowt so right-wing fascist as a left-wing liberal...
Wirral_Man
says...
8:31am Wed 10 Oct 12
For once I agree with the "right-wing facist leftie" what we don't want is a Wirral with the big urban areas with their hearts ripped out and new housing built on the few remaining green spaces to the west. Urban sprawl from Mersey to Dee anyone?
Spiffy
says...
10:30am Wed 10 Oct 12
Wirral_Man wrote:You're missing the point. Houses are needed...and allowed to be built in both areas ...( settled residential areas & those areas of desperate need of housing and development, as quoted...)...but Cllr Kelly seems to think he alone should be able to choose where a property developer can invest his time, money and expertise.
"Golly gosh ! How very DARE they have the freedom to build houses wherever the the law *allows* them to....they must ONLY build houses wherever Cllr Kelly *tells* them to !"
For once I agree with the "right-wing facist leftie" what we don't want is a Wirral with the big urban areas with their hearts ripped out and new housing built on the few remaining green spaces to the west. Urban sprawl from Mersey to Dee anyone?
...
Not "should" but "can". It's all in the language if you look.
...
Very free with other people's stuff, isn't he.
kevin casey
says...
12:26pm Wed 10 Oct 12
will spend no money at all here but can throw money in sponsership to football clubs and golf clubs they need to get a grip and listen to all the residents of wirral ! the woodchurch residents are treated like peasants (sack the lot and start again with people who give a ****
Positive thinker
says...
5:06pm Wed 10 Oct 12
by the present moratorium
WirralAl says...
3:10pm Mon 8 Oct 12
At present it is such a waste land of urban decay and neglect.