A free holiday, golf, and trips to Old Trafford - all in a day's work for some Wirral Council officers

Nice work if you can get it Nice work if you can get it

COUNCIL officers failing to record free gifts in the right way will damage the authority’s reputation, according to a senior councillor.

Freebies including theatre trips, Chester races tickets a flight, golf and a holiday – worth £2,000 - were among those highlighted by the District Auditor.

The watchdog's report, which went before a council audit committee on Wednesday night, criticised officers for not properly declaring gifts and hospitality offered to them.

The document does not name individual officers nor does it reveal where the generous donations came from.

However, it highlighted there had been a “high incidence of non-compliance with procedures and incomplete records,” and the department of adult social services was singled out as having no register for gifts and hospitality.

The department was given a rating of ‘one star,’ meaning the current system is in “urgent need of improvement.”

Wirral Council chief executive Graham Burgess said he would be looking at each officer’s case individually.

He told the Globe: “We agreed with the auditor that the report should be published in full and that we would be open and transparent about the officers not following the correct procedures.

“I have asked to look at each individual case from the report.

“But a number of the cases do not cause me concern as the officers were meeting key people investing in Wirral or building relationships.

"I understand that the findings could be seen in a negative way - but a key issue is that it could bring a benefit to Wirral and officers were carrying out additional work in their own time.”

The auditor recommended that all staff and managers were reminded of the correct procedures and guidelines when accepting and recording freebies.

However Labour councillor Steve Foulkes said the report would do little to help the authority’s already struggling reputation.

He said: “It’s a wake-up call for everyone and there is an important lesson to be learned. However, some of the things don’t read well and it doesn’t sound good.

“This will do our reputation damage and we need to tackle it head on and make sure everyone is 100% clear about what they do in those difficult situations.”

During the meeting, Tory councillor Leah Fraser also expressed her dismay at council workers not being able to accept small tokens of appreciation such as chocolates.

She said: “I was shocked to find that if officers or receptionists receive a box of chocolates for Christmas, they cannot keep them. Instead, they have to give them to the mayor’s charity.”

Officers are advised to refuse any personal gift from anyone who has, or potentially have, dealings with the council and should report the offer to their chief officer.

However the guidelines stipulate senior officers may accept hospitality if it falls in-line with carrying out their duties to the council and if the details are recorded as soon as possible.

But the report found that some entries onto the record had been signed by the officers themselves or their deputies, whereas some had not been signed off at all.

Out of 13 files assessed by the District Auditor, nine did not comply with procedures and “there was generally insufficient information to assess whether gifts and hospitality had been considered in line with guidance.”

Other instances included an honorary membership to West Kirby Sailing Club – thought to be worth more than £200 per year – and a ticket to a European Cup match at Old Trafford.

A senior officer accepted a number of instances of hospitality including golf, a flight, accommodation and meals amounting to £2,000.

Procedures were not complied with and there was insufficient information to tell whether the hospitality was considered in line with guidance.

Comments(46)

Cheesy Peas says...
11:52am Thu 20 Sep 12

Nice to see how things have changed at WBC!

bigfoot says...
11:58am Thu 20 Sep 12

Twas ever thus, you wonder what the old DASS regime received from 'dodgy' contractors especially thosethat were at the centre of the Martin Morton case.
So it seems the senior officers were on the take from everywhere especially the service users!
Drag them back in to account for their actions.
Will this be published in a Cheshire paper or will the remaining sniffling toadies in the Dept tell them,as is their want.

Mrs WFL says...
12:39pm Thu 20 Sep 12

I am totally dismayed by this, how can senior officers accept gifts when others can not expect little gifts such as a box of chocolates and even calandars!!!! around christmas time.
Any gifts that are handed in at reception for people are kept and a raffle is held with monies going to the Mayor Charity fund.
The identity of the officers should be published and dismissed for gross misconduct.
As these have actually been recorded, what gifts haven't?

woodyres2 says...
1:09pm Thu 20 Sep 12

Disgusting !!

Let's see if this report is published ... unlike the AKA report.

Name and shame everyone involved, this is especially shocking following the "freezing" of the community fund last week.

WirralAl says...
2:00pm Thu 20 Sep 12

Wirral Senior Council is just totally full of self satisfying rouges. I am sure that this is the tip of the iceberg.

Greedy and overpaid. All gifts and bungs should now be published so we can see who has been awarding contacts based on corporate greed and selfishness.

Still waiting to be asked how WBC should save money!!!!

mb2496 says...
2:11pm Thu 20 Sep 12

The reporters and editor of The Wirral Globe need to have a reality check... you are NOT The Daily Mail or The Sun, as much as you want to be. Every story you publish is sensationalised to a ridiculous level.

Were these items declared? YES
Has it cost Wirral taxpayers any money? NO

It's a shame you don't report on actual news stories occuring around Wirral, rather than taking the lazy option of re-publishing and sensationalising Council reports... which are all available to us taxpayers anyway, if you're interested!

I am as interested as the next person in the goings on of Wirral Council, but I go to their website where you can find reports, minutes, agendas, etc.

If Globe readers want to know what's happening or want answers, why not contact the Council directly rather than moaning on the Wirral Globule's website!!

Ben Beaconsfield says...
2:24pm Thu 20 Sep 12

How about this for an idea?

THERE SHOULD BE NO GIFTS OR HOSPITALITY FOR ANY WIRRAL COUNCIL EMPLOYEE OR ELECTED COUNCILLOR, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHATSOEVER.

In that way, there would be no need to have a register of such offerings, incomplete or otherwise.

And if council employees and councillors don't like this suggestion - well, nobody is forcing them to stay with Wirral or remain on the Council, are they?

PaulCa says...
2:24pm Thu 20 Sep 12

mb2496 wrote:
The reporters and editor of The Wirral Globe need to have a reality check... you are NOT The Daily Mail or The Sun, as much as you want to be. Every story you publish is sensationalised to a ridiculous level.

Were these items declared? YES
Has it cost Wirral taxpayers any money? NO

It's a shame you don't report on actual news stories occuring around Wirral, rather than taking the lazy option of re-publishing and sensationalising Council reports... which are all available to us taxpayers anyway, if you're interested!

I am as interested as the next person in the goings on of Wirral Council, but I go to their website where you can find reports, minutes, agendas, etc.

If Globe readers want to know what's happening or want answers, why not contact the Council directly rather than moaning on the Wirral Globule's website!!
Here's a blog, non-sensationalised, sometimes with a satirical edge, which talks of an #FoI request, lodged with Wirral Council way back in June 2011, 15 months ago, enquiring about a "Register for Senior Officers' Interests".

As you will read, the Council made an absolute dogs' breakfast of their response. Well... what would you expect of an abusive organisation where an independent investigator found "the abnormal had become normal", along with cataclysmic failings in corporate governance?

http://tinyurl.com/9
nr9ogp

The issue has been to appeal at the Information Commissioner's Office and the Decision Notice is reproduced here, listing the background to and consequences of Wirral Council's multiple breaches of Statutory Law.

Before defending the organisation again, read, inwardly digest and take onboard some much-needed enlightenment.

PaulCa says...
2:34pm Thu 20 Sep 12

PaulCa wrote:
mb2496 wrote:
The reporters and editor of The Wirral Globe need to have a reality check... you are NOT The Daily Mail or The Sun, as much as you want to be. Every story you publish is sensationalised to a ridiculous level.

Were these items declared? YES
Has it cost Wirral taxpayers any money? NO

It's a shame you don't report on actual news stories occuring around Wirral, rather than taking the lazy option of re-publishing and sensationalising Council reports... which are all available to us taxpayers anyway, if you're interested!

I am as interested as the next person in the goings on of Wirral Council, but I go to their website where you can find reports, minutes, agendas, etc.

If Globe readers want to know what's happening or want answers, why not contact the Council directly rather than moaning on the Wirral Globule's website!!
Here's a blog, non-sensationalised, sometimes with a satirical edge, which talks of an #FoI request, lodged with Wirral Council way back in June 2011, 15 months ago, enquiring about a "Register for Senior Officers' Interests".

As you will read, the Council made an absolute dogs' breakfast of their response. Well... what would you expect of an abusive organisation where an independent investigator found "the abnormal had become normal", along with cataclysmic failings in corporate governance?

http://tinyurl.com/9

nr9ogp

The issue has been to appeal at the Information Commissioner's Office and the Decision Notice is reproduced here, listing the background to and consequences of Wirral Council's multiple breaches of Statutory Law.

Before defending the organisation again, read, inwardly digest and take onboard some much-needed enlightenment.
Link to the Audit Commission report here:

http://tinyurl.com/c
4ydquf

Note. The Audit Commission is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act and does not have to respond to any of your requests.

Imagine the stink created up and down the land if it were. Nice strategic move / democratic deficit installed by some anonymous, unelected 'pillar' of the UK establishment !

johnhardaker says...
2:37pm Thu 20 Sep 12

Wirral Al,Ben,&Paul I totally agree with your points, what about brown envelopes as sweeteners for officers & other such BUNGS which have not yet been found out yet,I fear that this is the tip of the iceberg & more things will be found in the near future & hopefully these corrupt officers will be brought to book & sacked as they are unfit for office.as far as MB2496 is concerned without the globe,Martin Morton & others the corrupt & inept officers would not be exposed, what would you rather happen just swept under the carpet & let it go on,NO WAY,

uncatom says...
3:33pm Thu 20 Sep 12

Here here chaps,stop all hospitality bungs, lets face it why should they receive hospitality anyway? hospitality is given by the donor(s) for the express reason of receiving something in return or being considered for something, and is forbidden in most industries, if they want bungs they could apply as bar staff or waiting on staff, but hey they would have to work for a living.

ordinary personn says...
3:43pm Thu 20 Sep 12

The audit office may not have to respond to FOI requests about these “gifts” but surely the council does? I have to say though that I LOLLED and LOLLED at this guff from the new chief exec:

“But a number of the cases do not cause me concern as the officers were meeting key people investing in Wirral or building relationships. I understand that the findings could be seen in a negative way - but a key issue is that it could bring a benefit to Wirral and officers were carrying out additional work in their own time.”
.
What a load of horse manure! The bottom line is that there is such a thing as the bribery act which states that hospitaility must be:
“reasonable, proportionate and appropriate in the circumstances (including with reference to what is normal in the particular industry)”.
.
Now I am certainly not suggesting that there was any bribery but what we need to know is – who provided the hospitality, why they provided it, who took it, why they took it, were they in a position to influence decisions related to the company providing the hospitality and if so what decisions were made. The company providing the hospitality have to record that information by law so it is available.

JADEE1 says...
3:58pm Thu 20 Sep 12

get a outside police force in now & investigate the lot,!! all parties,!!its been goin on for years,& will continue to ,why do you think so many have been suspended ,or took early retirement,public servants are just that ,public servants,!!& SHOULD NOT EXPECT BACKHANDERS,!! wirral & indeed merseyside stink of corruption,with all the local councillors,GET THE LOT INVESTIGATED NOW & PROPERLY, BY AN OUTSIDE POLICE FORCE.!!STARTIN WITH ALL THE BENT LAND DEALS,!!.

LocaLGovwatcher says...
4:14pm Thu 20 Sep 12

Has anyone met the new CEO of WBC yet? It would be interesting to know what sort of handshake he has.

WirralAl says...
4:45pm Thu 20 Sep 12

mb2496 wrote:
The reporters and editor of The Wirral Globe need to have a reality check... you are NOT The Daily Mail or The Sun, as much as you want to be. Every story you publish is sensationalised to a ridiculous level.

Were these items declared? YES
Has it cost Wirral taxpayers any money? NO

It's a shame you don't report on actual news stories occuring around Wirral, rather than taking the lazy option of re-publishing and sensationalising Council reports... which are all available to us taxpayers anyway, if you're interested!

I am as interested as the next person in the goings on of Wirral Council, but I go to their website where you can find reports, minutes, agendas, etc.

If Globe readers want to know what's happening or want answers, why not contact the Council directly rather than moaning on the Wirral Globule's website!!
Which part of the council do you work for?

Bribes and Bungs for blaggers and liers?

The council hide the figures and lie a lot none of us believe them.

What is gained by these benefits contacts worth millions .

Should not be allowed in any way shape or form. One rule for all.

Stops bad judgements

Ben Beaconsfield says...
4:56pm Thu 20 Sep 12

Interesting that a local Labour councillor is questioning the veracity of this report via Twitter, and that a local Conservative councillor is reported as defending the giving of gifts to council employees.

montague1 says...
5:19pm Thu 20 Sep 12

I think, mb2496 is the one needing the reality check!
Is he/ she not aware these stories are neither sensational, nor are they published to a ridiclous level!
They are just "Normal" stories of further
wrongdoing by some Councillors and have come to be perceived by the electorate as same, old same old corruption perpetrated by the usual suspects!
But for Wirral Globe publishing this kind of information/news, much would remain hidden from public view, which of course would be music to those guilty parties.
Not everyone has access to a computer
and relies on their local paper for local news and the rotten behavior of some needs to be brought to the attention of the public in order to make an informed decision about who they choose when it comes to voting at election time.!

JADEE1 says...
5:50pm Thu 20 Sep 12

in a major report on the wirral council staff & councillors ,THEY ALL THINK , & i QUOTE,WHAT IS ABNORMAL ,IS NORMAL,!! GET A OUTSIDE POLICE FORCE IN NOW,!!

montague1 says...
6:08pm Thu 20 Sep 12

PS: IT'S WELL PAST THETIME TO NAME AND SHAME THESE SCOUNDRELS.
ENOUGH IS MORE THAN ENOUGH!!

Positive thinker says...
6:29pm Thu 20 Sep 12

Cant see what all the fuss is about

antisthenes says...
6:56pm Thu 20 Sep 12

From the Daily Telegraph...Graham Burgess of Blackburn with Darwen spent hundreds of pounds on regular lunches at his local pub, the Clog and Billycock.

Blackburn council said that Mr Burgess was entertaining “key local and regional partners”.

No doubt that Mr 'Clog and Billycock' Burgess' extensive experience of schmoozing big wigs will equip him with a forensic insight into the self indulgence of his new colleagues.

red devil says...
8:06pm Thu 20 Sep 12

Nothing is free. What have these councillors done for these 'freebies' in return.

It must have been illegal

Ben Beaconsfield says...
6:04am Fri 21 Sep 12

antisthenes wrote:
From the Daily Telegraph...Graham Burgess of Blackburn with Darwen spent hundreds of pounds on regular lunches at his local pub, the Clog and Billycock.

Blackburn council said that Mr Burgess was entertaining “key local and regional partners”.

No doubt that Mr 'Clog and Billycock' Burgess' extensive experience of schmoozing big wigs will equip him with a forensic insight into the self indulgence of his new colleagues.
"Poacher turned gamekeeper" ?

Tinkmax12 says...
10:35am Fri 21 Sep 12

What a disgrace greed well if anyone is thinking of buying any gifts they wanna get a mobile phone for one of the directors because his was broke last week an even his p.a could not get a message to him you know this important person so high up there on his pay has no phone hahahahaha what planet do these people think we are on he was probably away at is free golf trip or having a nice paid lunch somewhere while we are all suffering we need real people in these jobs they need a taste of the real world it's not what u know it's who you know absolutely unbelievable

LocaLGovwatcher says...
10:37am Fri 21 Sep 12

Things don't change much at WBC. It still appears that the words 'Truth, honesty, integrity and transparency' have been deleted from the WBC standards manual, never to be re-inserted, no matter what!

The WBC mantra appears to be 'Nothing is too good for Wirral residents, and that's exactly what we'll give them -nothing!'

council officer says...
8:59pm Fri 21 Sep 12

ordinary personn wrote:
The audit office may not have to respond to FOI requests about these “gifts” but surely the council does? I have to say though that I LOLLED and LOLLED at this guff from the new chief exec:

“But a number of the cases do not cause me concern as the officers were meeting key people investing in Wirral or building relationships. I understand that the findings could be seen in a negative way - but a key issue is that it could bring a benefit to Wirral and officers were carrying out additional work in their own time.”
.
What a load of horse manure! The bottom line is that there is such a thing as the bribery act which states that hospitaility must be:
“reasonable, proportionate and appropriate in the circumstances (including with reference to what is normal in the particular industry)”.
.
Now I am certainly not suggesting that there was any bribery but what we need to know is – who provided the hospitality, why they provided it, who took it, why they took it, were they in a position to influence decisions related to the company providing the hospitality and if so what decisions were made. The company providing the hospitality have to record that information by law so it is available.
Here here, totally agree. You have to look at it in the round and I am convinced it will make uncomfortable reading. If people are found out then sack them for corruption.

council officer says...
9:07pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Positive thinker wrote:
Cant see what all the fuss is about
maybe you would if you applied for a contract with the council and your living and that of your staff relied upon it. Only to find that despite your organisation being the best candidate, someone else got it because they gave the council officer a little something. Doesn't seem right does it? That's because it's not!

ordinary personn says...
3:43pm Sat 22 Sep 12

Cross-referencing the Colas story - The Audit Commission concluded - "Mr Green “probably” broke European rules by meeting with a representative of Colas - and by then failing to declare an interest when the contract was awarded."

Now, if David Green failed to declare an interest and was suspended, do we expect to see any action taken against those who failed to properly declare taking freebies, even though there is a clearly laid out procedure that should be followed? Nah – of course we don’t because the new chief exec says about the taking of ,and not properly declaring, freebies - “But a number of the cases do not cause me concern as the officers were meeting key people investing in Wirral or building relationships. I understand that the findings could be seen in a negative way - but a key issue is that it could bring a benefit to Wirral and officers were carrying out additional work in their own time.”
.
So if a relationship between meeting with people from and/or at a golf resort and the proposed golf resort development at Hoylake emerges is that OK?
.
If there is a link between going to Chester races and a supplier of services to the council is that OK?
.
Anybody else spot the contradiction here?
.
Mind you I blinking well hope they were: playing golf, taking accomodation, flying to wherever, watching a European football match, sailing at West Kirby, eating, and going to the theatre in their own time. If they were getting paid by us for having a jolly that really would add insult to injury!

PaulCa says...
4:27pm Sat 22 Sep 12

In recent years I've been worried about Steve, Jim and now I've moved onto Graham. Can't help it.

Has he touched base with local UNISON reps yet? In times gone by, he would have been the 'junior partner' in such an arrangement; keeping the other end up..... trailing around the golf course, sniffing around management's hind quarters, selecting clubs, polishing their balls and discussing "problem people" as a full time rep.

But now the shoe's on the other foot and its his own interests that need 'servicing' by the paid up, compromised, spy-in-the-camp UNISON lackeys & sycophants.

Let's hope he can deliver.

EddieGremlin says...
6:46pm Sat 22 Sep 12

A few years back when I was working as a bus/coach driver, I had a private hire to take our esteemed council offices to a dinner at Ruthin Castle. Alleged cost over £2,000 not inc the coach!

MX says...
9:32pm Sat 22 Sep 12

As a suggestion somebody might want to to check out beanos at Grosvenor Hotel,Chester.

bickyboy says...
9:34pm Sat 22 Sep 12

What we need right now is a whistleblower who is a councillor; someone with a social conscience that outweighs any part loyalty, someone who can avail the poor, put upon, plebby public of the true depths to which this (mixed metaphor alert) nest of vipers are willing to dip their snouts in the public trough.

Come on, Cllr. Courageous, we know you're out there somewhere....

bickyboy says...
9:35pm Sat 22 Sep 12

I meant "party loyalty" of course...sakc the tpyist

Ben Beaconsfield says...
8:00am Sun 23 Sep 12

bickyboy wrote:
What we need right now is a whistleblower who is a councillor; someone with a social conscience that outweighs any part loyalty, someone who can avail the poor, put upon, plebby public of the true depths to which this (mixed metaphor alert) nest of vipers are willing to dip their snouts in the public trough.

Come on, Cllr. Courageous, we know you're out there somewhere....
I hope you're not holding your breath, bickyboy. That could be as detrimental to your health as whistleblowing is to a councillor's career. And as we all know from what we have seen with our own eyes, political careers come before principles here in Wirral.

montague1 says...
8:34am Sun 23 Sep 12

IS WBC short for
"Wirral's Bunging Councillors" ?.

PaulCa says...
8:59am Sun 23 Sep 12

montague1 wrote:
IS WBC short for
"Wirral's Bunging Councillors" ?.
Whistle Blowers Cherished ?

Positive thinker says...
2:33pm Sun 23 Sep 12

Maybe the people responsible for giving these treats out realise how hard these people work and don't get rewarded financially for there efforts.
So they step in with a few treats which
I would consider to be a nice gesture
am I the only one who thinks this way

Ben Beaconsfield says...
3:38pm Sun 23 Sep 12

Positive thinker wrote:
Maybe the people responsible for giving these treats out realise how hard these people work and don't get rewarded financially for there efforts.
So they step in with a few treats which
I would consider to be a nice gesture
am I the only one who thinks this way
What you describe as 'treats', positive thinker, many of us might talk of as 'bribes'.

But then I suppose you are at least living up to your moniker !! ;-)

Positive thinker says...
4:25pm Sun 23 Sep 12

Some people on this blog seem to think everyone out there other than themselves are corrupt

montague1 says...
8:12pm Sun 23 Sep 12

Maybe we could all take (or go on the "TAKE") some guidance from Positive thinker if we consider we are all working too hard, for too little.
That way, when these wonderfully kind
philanthropic souls see this, and wish to bestow upon us, from the bottom of their gift driven hearts, little,(or large) bungs,SORRY I mean airline tickets, golfing holidays. Premier League match tickets, and heaven only knows what else, we should accept graciously and not have even the teeny weeniest
bit of conscience in so doing.
WARNING: Do Not Try This At Home
kiddy winkies!

David Scott says...
8:25pm Sun 23 Sep 12

Extract from an article in Daily Telegraph 3.11.2010:

The Audit Commission was set up by the Tories in 1983 to keep tabs on public spending.

But it became an early target for the new Government’s austerity drive, with Eric Pickles, the Communities Secretary, vetoing a proposed £240,000 salary for its chief executive.

It was criticised for paying almost £60,000 to lobbyists, as well as bombarding local authorities with “best practice” guidance on collecting rubbish.

Details of its spending showed that staff had enjoyed days out at the races and life coaching at public expense.

However new figures show that the Audit Commission continued to spend freely on hospitality even after its abolition was announced on August 13th.

The quango spent £5,000 on a dinner held on October 4th at the Banqueting House, the Grade I-listed palace on Whitehall renowned for its Rubens ceiling painting.

The meal was held for 140 members of Eurorai, a network of regional audit bodies, as the Audit Commission had agreed to hold its triennial gathering.

etc.

Tinkmax12 says...
9:21pm Sun 23 Sep 12

Positive thinker wrote:
Some people on this blog seem to think everyone out there other than themselves are corrupt
Do you work for the council or someone close to you or do u not live in the real word either

Positive thinker says...
9:55pm Sun 23 Sep 12

It would seem that if anything is printed
in the Globe about WBC it's the same
people week after week having ago at them,they all can't be bandits

daggers drawn says...
11:10pm Sun 23 Sep 12

council officer wrote:
ordinary personn wrote: The audit office may not have to respond to FOI requests about these “gifts” but surely the council does? I have to say though that I LOLLED and LOLLED at this guff from the new chief exec: “But a number of the cases do not cause me concern as the officers were meeting key people investing in Wirral or building relationships. I understand that the findings could be seen in a negative way - but a key issue is that it could bring a benefit to Wirral and officers were carrying out additional work in their own time.” . What a load of horse manure! The bottom line is that there is such a thing as the bribery act which states that hospitaility must be: “reasonable, proportionate and appropriate in the circumstances (including with reference to what is normal in the particular industry)”. . Now I am certainly not suggesting that there was any bribery but what we need to know is – who provided the hospitality, why they provided it, who took it, why they took it, were they in a position to influence decisions related to the company providing the hospitality and if so what decisions were made. The company providing the hospitality have to record that information by law so it is available.
Here here, totally agree. You have to look at it in the round and I am convinced it will make uncomfortable reading. If people are found out then sack them for corruption.
Agree wholeheartedly with Council officer. Wonder if this will be another AKA report-no names. About time that the staff lobbied the Chief Executive to name names! Name & shame is what is needed followed by disciplinary hearings. By not doing this he is tarring all staff with the same brush. Get a grip Burgess and communicate yourself instead of allowing others to wriite for you. Your staff deserve better.

Hugo1008 says...
7:09pm Tue 25 Sep 12

I notice that Steve Foulkes was not keen on the report being made public, seems that suppressing information and keeping things under wraps comes as second nature to some.

I can remember that the Famous Library Report was not even shared with the rest of the Coulcilors under Steves Dictatorship.
Plus when are we the public to see the complete AK report in complete transparency.
Despite the momumental requests under the freedom of information regulations.

Remember for close on twenty years the Labour Administration within Council in Wirral has very much led us into the dreadful present situation, believe me it is going to get worse in the very near future.

Wirral Residents are suffering a double whammy both on a National Basis, and the complete shambles on a local basis.

JADEE1 says...
8:44pm Tue 25 Sep 12

a back hander is a back hander !! a bribe is a bribe !! no wonder a new laundry was built in new brighton THE NEW,( CASINO ),to clean all the bent counsillors ,bent money,!! land deals penthouse apartments,& lots more ,!! this outside police force will be bangin this lot up for a long time,liverpool crown court is gonna be very busy,roll on roll on .!!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree