Birkenhead MP says new benefit system is 'heading for disaster'

Birkenhead MP says new benefit system is 'heading for disaster' Birkenhead MP says new benefit system is 'heading for disaster'

Frank Field has raised the alarm over the looming introduction of universal credit.

Writing on his blog, the Birkenhead MP said the programme is “heading for disaster.”

Ministers have insisted the shake-up will abolish poverty traps in which some benefit claimants lose up to 90p for every £1 they gain from taking a job.

Universal credit will replace six existing benefits, including Jobseeker's allowance and housing benefit, with one streamlined payment.

It will be piloted from next April, and is scheduled to start being “rolled out” in October of 2013.

Frank Field said the system will lead to people becoming more dependent on the State and aspects of it will "rot the soul" of claimants.

The former poverty adviser to Prime Minister David Cameron said that at the weekend, 70 organisations raised concerns about the introduction of universal credit, Iain Duncan Smith’s flagship welfare reform project.

“It is not so much whether millions of claimants will be unable to fill out a universal credit claim online which has so far occupied the anti-poverty lobby’s minds,”he writes.

“It is, rather, whether those applying for help will have an income they can sustainably use, as the credit will pay benefits at monthly intervals, rather than fortnightly as at present.

“It is clear that there are fundamental problems with universal credit.”

He continued that the new credit, due to be fully delivered by 2017, and initially set to have an additional £2 billion annual cost in benefits, aims to sweep together the main means-tested benefits and tax credits into one ‘universal’ benefit.

“Means-testing only encourages dependency, and the universal credit is in one sense, the ultimate form of means-testing. It obviously gets extra money to hard working families who earn low wages.

“But in doing so it rots the soul. “ Claimants can currently lose more than 90 pence for every extra pound in earnings. Under universal credit people can still lose about 65 pence of every extra pound – 20 pence more than the highest rate of tax.

Mr Field concluded: “I am therefore against the universal credit in principle, but I also fear that the programme is practically unachievable.

“Rumour has it so does the Prime Minister, hence the attempt to move IDS to Justice during last week’s reshuffle, so that the plans could be shelved."

Mr Duncan Smith faced critical questioning during a House of Commons select committee hearing yesterday about potential problems in the development of universal credit.

During a two-and-a-half-hour session, MPs on the influential work and pensions select committee highlighted the long and growing list of concerns about the new system.

Ministers insisted the scheme, and the computer programmes needed to manage it, would be ready on time.

Comments(9)

Positive thinker says...
3:39pm Tue 18 Sep 12

Frank loves giving money away

Spiffy says...
6:11pm Tue 18 Sep 12

"Claimants can currently lose more than 90 pence for every extra pound in earnings. Under universal credit people can still lose about 65 pence of every extra pound – 20 pence more than the highest rate of tax. "
...
Wait, what ? It's a bad thing to keep more of your earnings ? Reduction of benefits....because they are a gratuity you don't need from taxpayers pockets anymore because you are earning your own cash....is a bad thing ? How, exactly ?
...
I fail to see how this is comparable to tax but could also just as easily be viewed as a 45% tax rebate. That's more than the average pay rise of a politician...
...
Plenty of employees manage perfectly well with wages paid monthly . A fortnightly benefit is payable one week in arrears anyway. Learning to budget is crucial and just one thing that teaches anyone how to be independent. Is that not good for the soul ?
...
Frank, I'm really not seeing your problem here and certainly not anything "fundamental". If anything, you continuing to try to get better treatment for benefit claimants than those who work to support them should be a huge problem for your working voters (if you have any).
...
In noting IDS new position in the recent reshuffle you might want to bear in mind that your current title is "former" poverty adviser. Pot, kettle, black.

Positive thinker says...
7:54pm Tue 18 Sep 12

Looks like Frankie is running around
after the scum bags who will never stand on there own two feet.
GET REAL FRANKIE

No.9 says...
7:59pm Tue 18 Sep 12

There are plenty of employees managing perfectly well with wages paid monthly, trouble is there's also plenty who don't! with some of them relying on benefits to top up their low wages. There's been a massive increase in activity from the high interest, short-term loan vultures of late with the most high profile outfit targeting the elderly. It's easy to budget for the month when there's enough money coming in. And don't fall for the old tory trick of stigmatising benefit claimants as lazy, idle, cheating thieves in order to justify reducing the pittance they already try to survive on, the vast majority are just the opposite.

red devil says...
12:21am Wed 19 Sep 12

There are too many people in this country dependent on the state and why, because labour have brought us to this sorry state. To hell with the so called welfare state, its something from the dark ages that should be done away with. Too many non earners are getting fed and clothed by a state that they have no right to.

ordinary personn says...
11:41am Wed 19 Sep 12

red devil wrote:
There are too many people in this country dependent on the state and why, because labour have brought us to this sorry state. To hell with the so called welfare state, its something from the dark ages that should be done away with. Too many non earners are getting fed and clothed by a state that they have no right to.
What’s the alternative? The return of the workhouse, people having to work until they drop dead as there are no state pensions, people not being able to access healthcare because it is too expensive, only the rich being able to afford an education, people having to go to soup kitchens….?

oops Red Devil, it seems that you are too late - the welfare state is already well and truly on its way out and the dark ages on their way back in!

Spiffy says...
2:48pm Wed 19 Sep 12

No.9 - "There are plenty of employees managing perfectly well with wages paid monthly, trouble is there's also plenty who don't! "
...
Well quite, yet Frank isn't going out to bat for them. My point being that if monthly pay has been perfectly acceptable for decades for the workers who pay the taxes that pay the benefits...from his point of view... then he should have no problem when it's other way around.

David Scott says...
9:22am Thu 20 Sep 12

I can't see an article about this on Frank Field's blog. Has anyone got a link?

David Scott says...
10:37pm Mon 24 Sep 12

This report seems to be based on an article by Frank Field published in the Guardian. As others have found, I can't really follow his argument, either in this report or the Guardian article. Puts me in mind of what Tony Blair famously wrote about Frank (?).

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree