Auditor presents £75,000 bill for inquiry into council's highways contract

Auditor presents £75,000 bill for inquiry into council's highways maintenance contract Auditor presents £75,000 bill for inquiry into council's highways maintenance contract

FINANCIAL watchdogs have presented Wirral Council with a £75,000 bill for their inquiry into the handling of a highways contract.

The investigation conducted by district auditor Michael Thomas delved into the background of how privately-owned service provider Colas was awarded a £40m, five-year contract to assist the borough's highways and engineering services section in October 2008 after a tendering process.

The review was sparked after whistle-blowers raised concerns with Birkenhead MP Frank Field over alleged "irregularities" in the way the contract had been processed by the council.

The audit probe concluded that David Green, the currently suspended director of technical services, had “probably” broken European Union rules by meeting with a Colas representative and by further failing to declare an interest when the contract was awarded.

Mr Green was suspended from work in March prior to the report being published in early-June.

In a letter to be presented to council cabinet on Thursday, auditor Mr Thomas said his examination had shown the town hall had “exposed itself to significant risks.”

And it continues: “The weaknesses identified were, in my view, indicative of similar failings identified in other recent reports issued to the council.

"They highlighted the need for the council to strengthen its arrangements for demonstrating good governance and securing value for money in its use of public funds.

“My findings have continued to emphasise the need for the council to secure improvements in its arrangements for maintaining sound governance and for securing value for money, not least in the findings of my certification work on the award of a repair contract as part of the West Kirby marine lake protection works claim.”

The marine lake investigation threw up yet another problem for the authority when the audit commission published a further damning report alleging senior council officers had hidden key information over the precarious financial state of a firm handed a major contract to repair the lake.

According to the watchdog, Wirral's technical services department knew that the company, Northwich UK, was in "serious financial difficulties" but handed it the £750,000 contract without telling councillors of the concerns.

The firm started work but pulled out and subsequently went into liquidation.

Total fees charged by the commission for its work with Wirral Council for 2010/2011 are £624,000 - £122,000 higher than had been budgeted.

Reasons for the unexpected hike include that not all of the working papers were presented for audit by deadline, some were not to standard and contained a "significant number of errors in the statements.”

An inquiry by independent consultant Anna Klonowski into adult social services abuses highlighted by another whistle-blower, Martin Morton, cost Wirral council taxpayers £200,000.

Comments(11)

johnhardaker says...
4:39pm Mon 3 Sep 12

Well there goes another£75,000.00 down the drain uncovering inept & corrupt management,no surprises there then.What are Wirral Council doing for god sake are all its officers stupid, wasting ratepayers money in giving companies who are on the verge of bankruptcy contracts & awarding
multi-million pound contracts without performing due diligence & what are our local councilors there for other than to pick up their allowances. Surely they should be asking questions & getting straight answers from officers instead of which they are rubber stamping & then waiting for the #### to hit the fan & then being caught out & wasting our money on yet another enquiry paid for yet again by the ratepayers of Wirral.I despair at the people who run this borough surely we deserve better.

MX says...
7:28pm Mon 3 Sep 12

So relieved to see that lessons have been learned from the Audit Commission PIDA report from 2008 which cost Wirral Council £15,250.
The lesson being learned - lets screw the Council for 5X as much we did last time!.
Quintuples all round!.

briandrummond says...
11:31pm Tue 4 Sep 12

johnhardaker wrote:
Well there goes another£75,000.00 down the drain uncovering inept & corrupt management,no surprises there then.What are Wirral Council doing for god sake are all its officers stupid, wasting ratepayers money in giving companies who are on the verge of bankruptcy contracts & awarding
multi-million pound contracts without performing due diligence & what are our local councilors there for other than to pick up their allowances. Surely they should be asking questions & getting straight answers from officers instead of which they are rubber stamping & then waiting for the #### to hit the fan & then being caught out & wasting our money on yet another enquiry paid for yet again by the ratepayers of Wirral.I despair at the people who run this borough surely we deserve better.
How is this money down the drain if it has highlighted problems which need to be addressed? I can't believe comments like this. On the one hand you say we can't trust people on the council then when they pay for someone externally to investigate you criticise them for wasting money. Word of advice - perhaps engage brain before you type entries! Proof of the pudding will be what governance procedures are put in place to stop this happening again.

Mrsmccloud says...
12:02am Wed 5 Sep 12

briandrummond wrote:
johnhardaker wrote:
Well there goes another£75,000.00 down the drain uncovering inept & corrupt management,no surprises there then.What are Wirral Council doing for god sake are all its officers stupid, wasting ratepayers money in giving companies who are on the verge of bankruptcy contracts & awarding
multi-million pound contracts without performing due diligence & what are our local councilors there for other than to pick up their allowances. Surely they should be asking questions & getting straight answers from officers instead of which they are rubber stamping & then waiting for the #### to hit the fan & then being caught out & wasting our money on yet another enquiry paid for yet again by the ratepayers of Wirral.I despair at the people who run this borough surely we deserve better.
How is this money down the drain if it has highlighted problems which need to be addressed? I can't believe comments like this. On the one hand you say we can't trust people on the council then when they pay for someone externally to investigate you criticise them for wasting money. Word of advice - perhaps engage brain before you type entries! Proof of the pudding will be what governance procedures are put in place to stop this happening again.
I agree totally Brian, how can people allege cover ups then moan when independent auditors are paid to examine the books. People can't have it both ways, either you root out and deal with poor practice or you allow it to go on unchallenged. Alas the latter seemed to be the case for so long.

johnhardaker says...
9:39am Wed 5 Sep 12

Gentlemen,being a retired company director I was responsible to my fellow directors & shareholders to ensure that the business was run honestly & there were checks & balances in place to see that the business was run honestly. The same ethos should be with the people running wirral council & there would be no need for expensive enquiries .
Sorry that is my opinion & I stick by it.

johnbrace says...
7:14am Thu 6 Sep 12

@johnhardaker

Well in the "old days", (as in militant in Liverpool), the law allowed councillors to get surcharged, but like many laws unpopular with politicians it got repealed.

RL 1952 says...
11:12am Thu 6 Sep 12

Another £75K of council taxpayers money spent uncovering the inept and corrupt practices of council management, this is on top of £250K spent on the AKA report brought about by Martin Morton who was paid £45K to keep quiet. Have staff been disciplined over those findings - NO,but two were paid off and went? So named inept staff are free to carry on with their distasteful practices. So add it all up and you are talking around the £.5million mark and in real terms what has been acghieved very little, so where is this improvement board?

MX says...
9:33am Fri 7 Sep 12

RL 1952. I know someone who's keeping a tab on the cost of the whistleblowing cases and the last I heard it was running at £10 million plus.
This includes a number of investigations,a series of pay-offs,Council time (Officers/Councillor
s),lost revenues,suspensions
,legal costs and consultancy costs .....and counting.

The human cost is incalcuable.

dave301bounty says...
7:26pm Fri 7 Sep 12

There was a report on this issue in the Observer last week ,its head line was ,two Boroughs to watch closely ,wonder why they singled out Wallasey /Wirral .?

water1lily says...
12:25pm Sat 8 Sep 12

When is something going to be done about all the contracts the Council has with corrupt Care Providers. There is no monitoring of these contracts as a result the most vulnerable members of our community are still being being neglected and financially abused and even when irrefutable proof is provided to the Director, Senior Managers and the Contracts they refuse to allow a change of provider. As people in a position of power in law they are responsible for the abuse and should be facing criminal charges.

PaulCa says...
9:45pm Sun 9 Sep 12

The article above hasn't included figures for the huge sums lost during the HESPE contract, the albatross still draped around the council's neck that is COLAS and the serial impropriety the regional auditor found.

If I remember rightly, was it something like £1.4 million squandered because of fundamental and blatant contract breaches, and very basic failings - before the botched so-called "internal audit" found nothing wrong then issued a whitewash?

The stench of cover up must have been unbearable at the time. Mike Thomas must have approached it in full bio-hazard chemical suit with a peg on his nose, clutching for dear life onto the prospect of £75k 'prize money'.

Logically, the fault lies right back at the start of the whole process. With hindsight, we can now intone gravely to the suspended director, "Unless you actually WANTED to be engulfed by scandal, with your career collapsing all around you, why didn't you remember the basics: OK, be selfish and demanding on the part of the council tax payer, but keep it clean, above board, don't get greedy.... and one day, some time in your mid to late 50s, you'll be home free, collecting a generous gold-plated personal pension pot."

But ......in he went regardless, pound signs in the eyes, over his head, it all collapsed around him and the rest is history :-(

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree