- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@WIRRALGLOBENEWS
All the latest news and views from the Wirral Globe
- Find us on Facebook
Wirral Globe
Like us on Facebook
Auditor presents £75,000 bill for inquiry into council's highways contract (From Wirral Globe)
Send us news by text, start your message Globe News and your send photos and videos to 80360
Auditor presents £75,000 bill for inquiry into council's highways contract
1:45pm Monday 3rd September 2012 in News By Leigh Marles, Editor
Auditor presents £75,000 bill for inquiry into council's highways maintenance contract
FINANCIAL watchdogs have presented Wirral Council with a £75,000 bill for their inquiry into the handling of a highways contract.
The investigation conducted by district auditor Michael Thomas delved into the background of how privately-owned service provider Colas was awarded a £40m, five-year contract to assist the borough's highways and engineering services section in October 2008 after a tendering process.
The review was sparked after whistle-blowers raised concerns with Birkenhead MP Frank Field over alleged "irregularities" in the way the contract had been processed by the council.
The audit probe concluded that David Green, the currently suspended director of technical services, had “probably” broken European Union rules by meeting with a Colas representative and by further failing to declare an interest when the contract was awarded.
Mr Green was suspended from work in March prior to the report being published in early-June.
In a letter to be presented to council cabinet on Thursday, auditor Mr Thomas said his examination had shown the town hall had “exposed itself to significant risks.”
And it continues: “The weaknesses identified were, in my view, indicative of similar failings identified in other recent reports issued to the council.
"They highlighted the need for the council to strengthen its arrangements for demonstrating good governance and securing value for money in its use of public funds.
“My findings have continued to emphasise the need for the council to secure improvements in its arrangements for maintaining sound governance and for securing value for money, not least in the findings of my certification work on the award of a repair contract as part of the West Kirby marine lake protection works claim.”
The marine lake investigation threw up yet another problem for the authority when the audit commission published a further damning report alleging senior council officers had hidden key information over the precarious financial state of a firm handed a major contract to repair the lake.
According to the watchdog, Wirral's technical services department knew that the company, Northwich UK, was in "serious financial difficulties" but handed it the £750,000 contract without telling councillors of the concerns.
The firm started work but pulled out and subsequently went into liquidation.
Total fees charged by the commission for its work with Wirral Council for 2010/2011 are £624,000 - £122,000 higher than had been budgeted.
Reasons for the unexpected hike include that not all of the working papers were presented for audit by deadline, some were not to standard and contained a "significant number of errors in the statements.”
An inquiry by independent consultant Anna Klonowski into adult social services abuses highlighted by another whistle-blower, Martin Morton, cost Wirral council taxpayers £200,000.
Comments(11)
MX
says...
7:28pm Mon 3 Sep 12
The lesson being learned - lets screw the Council for 5X as much we did last time!.
Quintuples all round!.
briandrummond
says...
11:31pm Tue 4 Sep 12
johnhardaker wrote:How is this money down the drain if it has highlighted problems which need to be addressed? I can't believe comments like this. On the one hand you say we can't trust people on the council then when they pay for someone externally to investigate you criticise them for wasting money. Word of advice - perhaps engage brain before you type entries! Proof of the pudding will be what governance procedures are put in place to stop this happening again.
Well there goes another£75,000.00 down the drain uncovering inept & corrupt management,no surprises there then.What are Wirral Council doing for god sake are all its officers stupid, wasting ratepayers money in giving companies who are on the verge of bankruptcy contracts & awarding
multi-million pound contracts without performing due diligence & what are our local councilors there for other than to pick up their allowances. Surely they should be asking questions & getting straight answers from officers instead of which they are rubber stamping & then waiting for the #### to hit the fan & then being caught out & wasting our money on yet another enquiry paid for yet again by the ratepayers of Wirral.I despair at the people who run this borough surely we deserve better.
Mrsmccloud
says...
12:02am Wed 5 Sep 12
briandrummond wrote:I agree totally Brian, how can people allege cover ups then moan when independent auditors are paid to examine the books. People can't have it both ways, either you root out and deal with poor practice or you allow it to go on unchallenged. Alas the latter seemed to be the case for so long.
johnhardaker wrote:How is this money down the drain if it has highlighted problems which need to be addressed? I can't believe comments like this. On the one hand you say we can't trust people on the council then when they pay for someone externally to investigate you criticise them for wasting money. Word of advice - perhaps engage brain before you type entries! Proof of the pudding will be what governance procedures are put in place to stop this happening again.
Well there goes another£75,000.00 down the drain uncovering inept & corrupt management,no surprises there then.What are Wirral Council doing for god sake are all its officers stupid, wasting ratepayers money in giving companies who are on the verge of bankruptcy contracts & awarding
multi-million pound contracts without performing due diligence & what are our local councilors there for other than to pick up their allowances. Surely they should be asking questions & getting straight answers from officers instead of which they are rubber stamping & then waiting for the #### to hit the fan & then being caught out & wasting our money on yet another enquiry paid for yet again by the ratepayers of Wirral.I despair at the people who run this borough surely we deserve better.
johnhardaker
says...
9:39am Wed 5 Sep 12
Sorry that is my opinion & I stick by it.
johnbrace
says...
7:14am Thu 6 Sep 12
Well in the "old days", (as in militant in Liverpool), the law allowed councillors to get surcharged, but like many laws unpopular with politicians it got repealed.
RL 1952
says...
11:12am Thu 6 Sep 12
MX
says...
9:33am Fri 7 Sep 12
This includes a number of investigations,a series of pay-offs,Council time (Officers/Councillor
s),lost revenues,suspensions
,legal costs and consultancy costs .....and counting.
The human cost is incalcuable.
dave301bounty
says...
7:26pm Fri 7 Sep 12
water1lily
says...
12:25pm Sat 8 Sep 12
PaulCa
says...
9:45pm Sun 9 Sep 12
If I remember rightly, was it something like £1.4 million squandered because of fundamental and blatant contract breaches, and very basic failings - before the botched so-called "internal audit" found nothing wrong then issued a whitewash?
The stench of cover up must have been unbearable at the time. Mike Thomas must have approached it in full bio-hazard chemical suit with a peg on his nose, clutching for dear life onto the prospect of £75k 'prize money'.
Logically, the fault lies right back at the start of the whole process. With hindsight, we can now intone gravely to the suspended director, "Unless you actually WANTED to be engulfed by scandal, with your career collapsing all around you, why didn't you remember the basics: OK, be selfish and demanding on the part of the council tax payer, but keep it clean, above board, don't get greedy.... and one day, some time in your mid to late 50s, you'll be home free, collecting a generous gold-plated personal pension pot."
But ......in he went regardless, pound signs in the eyes, over his head, it all collapsed around him and the rest is history :-(
johnhardaker says...
4:39pm Mon 3 Sep 12
multi-million pound contracts without performing due diligence & what are our local councilors there for other than to pick up their allowances. Surely they should be asking questions & getting straight answers from officers instead of which they are rubber stamping & then waiting for the #### to hit the fan & then being caught out & wasting our money on yet another enquiry paid for yet again by the ratepayers of Wirral.I despair at the people who run this borough surely we deserve better.