News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


RESIGN! Birkenhead MP demands Wirral Council chief executive and education boss stand down

Birkenhead MP Frank Field Birkenhead MP Frank Field

BIRKENHEAD MP Frank Field has this afternoon demanded the resignation of Wirral Council's chief executive and education director.

Mr Field has sent a blistering letter to Steve Maddox expressing fury at his "shameful" management of the town's schools.

He said Mr Maddox and Howard Cooper, the chief officer of the children's department, should resign immediately.

The council has refuted the MP's accusations.

Mr Field says that he has met with Howard Cooper on many occasions to ask for action to be taken against the low examination results achieved by "most of" Birkenhead’s pupils.

And in 2008, the Labour MP lobbied the Government and council to establish a new Academy in Birkenhead.

Throughout the process, Mr Field says there had been a "culture of inaction" among chief officers and he raised these concerns with Mr Maddox.

Such was Mr Field's frustration that he demanded Mr Maddox should fire Mr Cooper.

But, according to Mr Field, the chief executive instead indicated that he would be backing his education boss to the hilt.

The Academy project was put back a year due, says Mr Field, "to Wirral officers’ inability to deliver basic data" that the Department for Children, Schools and Families had requested.

Related links

The department has now confirmed the project is in danger of a further year’s delay due, claims Mr Field, to the council’s failure to adhere to the agreed timetable which would have seen the project fully agreed for a 2010 opening.

Mr Field said: “Wirral’s senior officers have abjectly failed to act in the best interests of my young constituents.

"Despite repeatedly calling for the chief executive to address the incompetence of his senior education officer, council officers have consistently failed to deliver this new school to deadline.

"I have therefore called for Stephen Maddox’s and Howard Cooper’s resignations.”

In his five-page letter to Mr Maddox, Mr Field writes: "You have presided over a local authority with shameful education outcomes for too many of our young people.

"If any hospital had a comparable record whereby 81 per cent of its patients were either injured or killed, that hospital would rightly be closed immediately and, if the senior management refused to do the decent thing and resign, heads would roll.

"Yet a 19 per cent success rate was the record of one school in Birkenhead.

"Sending our young people out into the world of work without the minimum school leaving requirements similarly damages or kills their chances of long term employability.

"This letter establishes how I have tried in vain over the years to stir you and your senior officers into action. Repeated letters and phone calls led only to your assurance that matters would radically improve.

"Now I learn that, through your inability to show the minimum level of leadership necessary to run any local authority, the new Academy will not be opening until 2011, two years after the originally agreed date.

"The incompetence that you and Howard Cooper have displayed in mismanaging education in Birkenhead has smitten the lives of too many of the young people I represent in Birkenhead and is unacceptable.

"I told you that if there were any further setbacks to establishing a new secondary school in Birkenhead I would publicly call for the removal of you both.

"I therefore serve notice that I am doing exactly that."

A statement from Wirral Council strongly refutes any suggestion that there have been any unnecessary delays in the delivery of the proposed new Academy in Birkenhead.

And the authority hit back at statements suggesting Birkenhead schools are not performing well at improving educational attainment levels.

It says: "Wirral Council is deeply committed to improving the life chances for young people right across Wirral.

"We have had considerable success in driving up attainment right across the borough and ensuring investment is made in to our children’s future.

"Secondary education in Wirral is of high quality and using Ofsted's own data compared to national and similar local authority data provision is outstanding and the 2nd best in the whole of the Northwest.

"Most importantly, we believe it is important to refute the suggestion that schools in Birkenhead are not delivering ever improving outcomes for young people.

"All schools in Birkenhead have been judged by Ofsted on the most recent full school inspection to be at least ‘good’, a tribute to the teaching staff and council officers working so hard in this area."

The statement says the delivery of the proposed new Academy in Birkenhead has not been delayed by officers of the council, and that the reverse is the case.

"The project is moving apace with a meeting held just this morning with key funding partners including the University of Chester."

Timescales have changed for reasons that are beyond the control of the authority this includes issues around sponsorship, which is the responsibility of the DCSF.

The statement continues: "Throughout the process we have met all DCSF requirements and requests for information however challenging the timescale.

"We welcome constructive debate as to how we can all work together to continue to drive up standards and make a difference to the future life chances of children in Birkenhead and right across Wirral."

Comments(28)

djrimmer says...
4:49pm Fri 5 Mar 10

And while your at it Mr Field, what about David Green for his gross incompetence, Stennard for his SAR, Norman and Webb for their disgraceful behaviour towards Martin Morton. The list is endless. The only chance Wirral Council has of regaining any public credibility is to get rid of the lot of them and start afresh.

ghawkins says...
7:39pm Fri 5 Mar 10

Completely agree with the above. Like at national level, Wirral Council needs a major clear out. How many senior (highly paid) council executives will be losing their jobs as part of the ongoing cuts? Not enough is the answer.

Merseymouth says...
8:02pm Fri 5 Mar 10

Admirable that Mr Maddox is backing his senior staff. There seems to be a good working relationship with everyone in senior management at the Town Hall. I bet even Mr Foulkes backs Mr Maddox.

It does make one wonder just what it is that they all have one each other?

Security words, Move Many. Very apt!

Rabyrover says...
8:12pm Fri 5 Mar 10

Frank could have added that four secondaries failed to achieve the government's minimum standard of 30% of pupils achieving a "C" grade or better at GCSE. His government has said such results are unacceptable and the schools should be closed. Wirral's educational establishment continues to praise this mediocrity

glenn, moreton says...
8:53pm Fri 5 Mar 10

Well said Frank, about time as well. Maybe you should consider joining the conservatives after they win the general election on behalf of every right thinking person who cares about morality and justice on the wirral a la mandelson who thinks his 'vast' experience is more important than his allegiance to the party who put him where he is. I consider your judgement and morality far superior and would think that any conservative would see that too - far above than anything that (mr) mandleson could offer.

Dantealighieri says...
10:18pm Fri 5 Mar 10

Any right thinking person would be fighting to bring back the grammar and secondary modern schools, not trying put the sticking plaster of academies over the failed comprehensive system. I can't be bothered going into the statistics regarding the claim by the authority that secondary education in Wirral is outstanding and 2nd best in the northwest, but if that's true, how big a part does the selective system in Deeside and Bebington play in achieving that? OK Slumdog, take your finger out of your butt and get typing. Ready. Only UKIP support the return of the grammar schools.

ghawkins says...
10:49pm Fri 5 Mar 10

I would be interested to know how many of our council top brass fall within the £50,000 - £100,000 pay bracket (due to be made public knowledge in the near future if current proposals are carried out, although individuals won't be identified if the Government have their way) and how many earn more than £100,000?

ghawkins says...
10:54pm Fri 5 Mar 10

Opps, my lack of sleep and over consumption of caffeine in the past few days has caught up with me. Those who earn £50,000 - £150,000 will have their salaries published (but remain anonymous); so only those earning more than £150,000 will be named ...

slumdog says...
11:51pm Fri 5 Mar 10

Dante, you sound more like the Vivian Stanshall character, Sir Henry at Rawlinson End, all the time..'harrumph,brin
g back hanging, harrumph..grammar schools, harrumph..national service, that would sort them out, yes. Capital punishment never did me any harm, oops! Sorry Matron I think I meant corporeal punishment, didn't I? Oh well you know what I mean'
.
Get you letter knife out and clean the Werthers Originals off your dentures, then polish your ear trumpet and toddle off to the band stand.
.
The 'independents' have come back out again I see. Couldn't resist this one eh?
.
More support for the Tories again too. What about Lord Ashcroft and his massive bankrolling excercise funded by money he dodged paying in tax then?

TheLooseCannon says...
2:24pm Sat 6 Mar 10

djrimmer, you're absolutely right. Whilst I'm delighted that Mr Field has spoken out about the appalling behaviour of Council officers in respect of their failures to Wirral's children, I do wonder why he is not equally concerned about the
seventeen adults with learning disabiities, some of who are STILL being financially abused by the Council, and with the connivance and blessing of the DWP.
.
Martin Morton and I met with Mr Field, and I have emailed him on several occasions regarding ongoing elements in this case, but he doesn't seem willing or able to do anything about it.

hugo2008 says...
2:34pm Sat 6 Mar 10

Frank Field, use your influence and know how to get a democratically elected Mayor, with full executive powers for Wirral.
Stand yourself if needs be, then we can remove all the dead tissue from the council employees ranks.
Trim the bloated 66 Councillors to a more manageable size with specific areas to look into with a great deal of inspection on performance.
Make the Wirral Council system fit for purpose in every aspect, and no matter what Party wins the election, we will all be behind you.
Otherwise you are just grand-standing for effect like the rest of our so called present MPs neither use nor ornamental to Wirral.

kmka says...
2:39pm Sat 6 Mar 10

This from the guy that wanted to close Ridgeway, a high achieving school, and merge it's pupils with two of the lowest achieving schools.
Enough said.

MX says...
5:13pm Sat 6 Mar 10

I question both Mr.Fields timing and motives rather than his judgement.
He's absolutely right about the incompetence of Councuil Chief Officers ,but he's known about this for years.
The only reason they've got away with it for this long is because of the ineptitude of his colleague Steve Foulkes.

minimad69 says...
9:43am Sun 7 Mar 10

Nice to note Frank Field taking his head out of the sand on local matters at last - and with accurate figures (from the man who think we have too many libraries - he thinks we have 44 not the 22 that actually exist!!!!). Oh and don't forget that this man is a 'great mate' of Steve Foulkes - who is a great mate of Maddox (what does he actually do ?) - who is a great mate of Stennard - who is a great mate of Howard Cooper - starting to really stink now.... - a boys club - who are far more likely to look after their mates than us !!!.

ghawkins says...
4:06pm Sun 7 Mar 10

slumdog, I have no political axe to grind. Whilst some here may well be closet Tories, you sound like you have a Labour sympathy, so it's swings and roundabouts ;)

The shameful state of Wirral Council's bloated top brass shouldn't be a political issue; it should be a common sense issue, but when the likes of Foulkes and others do nothing to remedy the problem of Wirral's senior management, then it becomes one.

By the way, this week they've made a few more appointments including a highly paid "Eco" Officer - shouldn't that already be the remit of somebody in the (top -heavy) "Technical Services"?

slumdog says...
5:26pm Sun 7 Mar 10

ghawkins, glad I saw your comment so soon. Tories and Labour these days are like two cheeks of the same *rse and I don't want to be associated with either thank you !

ghawkins says...
6:36pm Sun 7 Mar 10

Fair enough slumdog, you are right about the two main parties, although at Wirral level, the Lib Dems have hardly covered themselves in glory either!

What about the Lib Dem councillors who voted for the library closure scheme, until they found out it would affect libraries in their area? Disgraceful. At local level the Lib Dems have proved a monumental failure and I am suprised that their national leadership haven't instigated measures against them

slumdog says...
7:45pm Sun 7 Mar 10

ghawkins, I dont promote the LibDems either but I know what you mean. I suppose it all depends on just how 'local' you want to to get.
.

If any of the main parties were to have any real integrity these days, you would expect it to be the Libdems. The Tories and Labour are more likely to buy them a big drink for their mis-doings

hugo2008 says...
8:56am Mon 8 Mar 10

Hey happy campers, who contribute to these debates.
I have heard that the quarter of a million civil servants who are reputed to be on a two day strike, will actually get paid while on the stoppage.
Fair play they are entitled to defend whatever conditions and benefits they have negotiated for.
But are we the taxpayers supposed to pay them wages while on dispute.
Seem the senior managements of the various organizations the staff belong too, either cannot or will not be able to arrange temporary cover or skeleton cover to vital important services.
So I understand that we the tax payer will pay for the strike, if the protest is successful we will also pay the benefits to any civil servants who may get displaced or suffer any cutbacks.
I was told this is what they call a "WIN WIN Situation" or just another example of how deep in the "Mire" this country and its administration is.
(curious code word) desk-warm?
2nd one (will-milk)

hugo2008 says...
9:00am Mon 8 Mar 10

oops! seems like I lost the comment.

Are the striking civil servants being paid while on their stoppage, rumor has it very resounding "Yes"

Rainbowbright says...
11:55am Mon 8 Mar 10

Hugo - the striking Civil Servants will NOT be paid by the public purse for the days they are in strike. They may, however, get strike pay from their union.

Black Eagle says...
7:07pm Mon 8 Mar 10

Frank Field is right but anyone trying to unglue Wirral Council's top dogs from their 'posts' reminds me of what happens when the 'immovable object meets the irresistible force'. I mean to say, does dear old Frank honestly believe for one moment that he, or for that matter, the entire British army could detach these people from their film star salaries. Hell will freeze over before that happens!

Merseymouth says...
10:35pm Mon 8 Mar 10

Hugo, my son is one of those on strike and I assure you they are not getting paid.

In my experience, people don't go on strike just for the hell of it. The Tory press will always say differently but they would, wouldn't they?

P.S. These are not the highly paid shiney bottomed civil servants we are talking about but the peasants at the bottom of the food chain.

hugo2008 says...
8:28am Tue 9 Mar 10

I am not worried about if the Civil Servants get paid or not, I feel sorry for those who will lose money. I am however concerned about those in senior positions apparent ineptitude to deal with a miner crisis.
I feel that if those on the front line have concerns about their future, they should use whatever means available to expose the dead wood within their ranks.
They could for instance expose the poor standard of management, expose the sheer waste from the systems they operate. Make an issue of the abuse of the system that seems to pervade every department.
Do some circumspect whistle blowing, and alert the general public with facts, names, and locations where the parasite fester.
That way they can clean up their own locations and situations.

Bruce Lee says...
1:44pm Wed 10 Mar 10

Slumdog-Liberal,nuff said.

slumdog says...
2:01pm Wed 10 Mar 10

Wrong, Bruce.

Ptee says...
11:28am Fri 12 Mar 10

I would like to add that the 'children and young people's department' are also letting the young people of Wirral down by the way they are dealing with bullying within our schools! Mr Cooper and his underlings seem to have a 'head in the sand' attitude to any problems, and do not respond the way they say they will in their anti bullying documents! Strong words are within these policies and yet weak actions follow! It's a disgrace! And the knock on effect will be felt on our streets and in our prisons for years to come with anti social behaviour!

PaulCa says...
6:08pm Sun 14 Mar 10

This is all a not very elaborate ruse on the part of Frank Field and the main players on the other side, and they're all laughing up their sleeves. Ask yourselves who stands to gain and lose? Frank Field stands to gain because he appears to be selflessly aligning himself with local people's distrust of senior officers (not councillors). There is an election in the next few weeks. What better than to attack the bad boys - especially the ones who aren't allowed to go public and defend themselves (in the way councillors most certainly can).

The man's not a fool and he knows how to play his not very politically aware constituents - no offence intended to anybody. There are other incumbent MPs in Merseyside adopting a similar tactic in the approach to the election. It stinks because they take their voters (and the Wirral Globe) for fools - which they most certainly are not - as will hopefully become clear on May 6th.

click2find

Most popular