Wirral Council agrees to pay £244,000 back to vulnerable adults it overcharged for years, vindicating a 'whistleblower' (From Wirral Globe)
Send us news by text, start your message Globe News and your send photos and videos to 80360
Wirral Council agrees to pay £244,000 back to vulnerable adults it overcharged for years, vindicating a 'whistleblower'
7:00pm Friday 15th January 2010 in News By Justin Dunn
'Whistleblower' Martin Morton
Wirral Council finally admitted owing a quarter of a million pounds to vulnerable adults last night.
In what council leader Steve Foulkes described as "not our finest episode", the authority systematically overcharged at least sixteen people for years on end.
The overcharging only came to light when a whistleblower repeatedly tried to highlight them with his bosses at Adult Social Services.
The whistleblower, Martin Morton, was eventually paid £45,000 to leave the service and keep quiet. Instead, in November 2008, he approached the Globe and we helped him tell his story.
The result was last night's meeting of the council's ruling cabinet committee, where it was agreed to repay almost a quarter of a million pounds to the sixteen adults who had been overcharged.
Mr Morton maintains the amount is nearer to £500,000 and involves more than just sixteen people.
As the cabinet prepared to approve the process of allowing people to reclaim the money, council leader Steve Foulkes declared: "This was clearly not our finest episode."
He said it was "regrettable" that anybody may have been "damaged" by the long-running saga and added: "I offer my personal apologies to those involved."
The committee read from a report that told how elderly and vulnerable people living in homes at Bermuda Road, Curlew Way and Edgehill Road, all in Moreton, were systematically overcharged by Adult Social Services for seven years.
Mr Morton had raised his concerns several times with his managers, but claims he was ignored, bullied and driven out of his job.
Days after our exclusive report in November 2008, two senior officers were suspended but, after disciplinary hearings, were later reinstated.
The stress of blowing the whistle drove Mr Martin to the verge of a nervous breakdown and he was subsequently hospitalised.
He was given a £45,000 pay-off from the council to leave his job in social services.
An internal audit to examine Mr Martin's claims was eventually ordered and reported its findings in September of last year.
It ruled that people living in the three homes under a so-called "special charging policy" had been overcharged and that the policy was unlawful.
The town hall has set aside £68,000 to repay the residents - but the total sum needed is £244,000.
The report to last night's meeting made it clear the authority is not going to just hand over a cheque for the money it owes.
Instead, the council's director of law, Bill Norman, recommended that officers write to individuals "advising" them to make a claim against the authority.
He said residents on means-tested benefits may encounter unexpected difficulties if they suddenly come into a substantial sum of money.
He wrote in the report: "There is the potential impact upon each affected individual’s current financial position.
"The impact of the reimbursement of a significant sum of money, when combined with any capital resources an individual may already have, may have wider implications that may not be initially appreciated by those in receipt of means-tested benefits.
"The regulations for such benefits are framed in such a way as to preclude individuals or those acting on their behalf from taking such actions, in any way, which may be regarded as an evasion of benefit regulations."
Mr Norman recommended that individuals will need to be notified that they may have a claim against the council in respect of the "deemed overpayment".
"They will need to consider their positions, and if they believe they have a legitimate entitlement, make a claim for reimbursement against the council.
"It would be advisable, and indeed highly desirable, that each individual be given access to independent advice in formulating such a view and potential claim."
He suggested the council should steer tenants with a potential claim towards the Wirral Advocacy Service, a charity which offers free legal advice.
Officers will now write to individuals and their carers and advocates informing them of this, and inviting them to seek appropriate advice "so as to ensure they make an informed decision if they choose to submit a claim".
Cllr Foulkes said the affair had proved that anyone within the council with a complaint - "or a whistleblower, as the term has been used in this case" - would have their grievances properly investigated and acted upon.
Martin Morton's blistering response to that will appear in his own words in next week's print edition of the Globe, and later online.
Comments(29)
kmka
says...
12:20pm Fri 15 Jan 10
Natasha Eubank
says...
12:22pm Fri 15 Jan 10
The Council, through its records, will be aware of the individuals that this overcharging has affected - Why then are the victims required to make a 'claim'?
The Council claims that the reimbursement of this money would negatively affect the victims entitlement to state benefit - What representations has the Council made to the DWP, to advise them that this situation has resulted out of the Councils inability to provide appropriate care and support for vulnerable people and therefore the victims of this overcharging should not be unfairly penalised for the Councils ineptitude?
Finally, Councillor Foulkes has stated that this 'affair had proved that anyone within the council with a complaint - "or a whistleblower, as the term has been used in this case" - would have their grievances properly investigated and acted upon'. I assure you that there are very few people working for the Council who hold any faith whatsoever in the Wirrals Whistleblowing Policy after the treatment meted out to Mr. Morton. This man endured bullying from Directors and Assistant Directors of Adult Social Services and Elected Members as a result of his disclosure. Furthermore, it took 9 YEARS(!) before this matter finally received the attention it deserved and even then, has been subsequently minimised and distorted by senior officers and members, so yes Councillor Foulkes, the Whistleblowing system in Wirral Council is a real shining beacon of Equity and Transparency isn't it?
If anyone in the Council had any faith in the Whistleblowing policy, you would have been ripped seven ways from Sunday over WBC's inability to prevent financial abuse in one particular supported accommodation provider.
So, my final question is directed solely to Councillor Foulkes - How can you sleep at night?
Casey Jones 01
says...
12:34pm Fri 15 Jan 10
piggymalone
says...
1:44pm Fri 15 Jan 10
Message to Leig or Justin;
How about running internet replies to this story alongside Mr Mortons reply next week to show the 100% public support for him. This will also show councillors the shear bad taste in the mouths of the electorate over this affair
Spiffy
says...
2:01pm Fri 15 Jan 10
...
How about the globe organising an interview with a senior SS officer and get the official position on any repayments to benefit recipients ? That would save every single claimant having to find out for themselves, some may not be capable of doing so without a great deal of assistance that they may feel either too proud or unable to ask for.
...
How about the Globe organising an online petition signed en masse selectively worded to precisely express the populations of Wirrals deep revulsion at the despicable treatment of Mr Morton and all the victims of fraud ?
...
How about Mr Morton himself and a mass gathering of supporters marching to the town hall and handing over these petitions directly to Foulkes himself - with local press present. ?
...
SHAME THE B*S**RD !
Spiffy
says...
2:03pm Fri 15 Jan 10
hugo2008
says...
2:06pm Fri 15 Jan 10
I urge folk to remember all this when MPs come calling for your support. Likewise so called elected Councilors who have been fully aware of the circumstances for some considerable time.
Spiffy
says...
2:16pm Fri 15 Jan 10
...
Good point Hugo. I'd like to see the Globe investigating and printing a list of all the names of everyone involved at any point in this massive cover-up. No allegations just names.
...
If those persons then feel the need to explain their involvement then fair enough. I doubt many people would be happy to allow the electorate to speculate on it though. Truth will out.
hugo2008
says...
5:22pm Fri 15 Jan 10
I think people who elected you would expect some kind of reaction, just for the sake of fair play, and a bit of open honesty.
piggymalone
says...
6:53pm Fri 15 Jan 10
glenn, moreton
says...
8:11pm Fri 15 Jan 10
Jayo
says...
8:43pm Fri 15 Jan 10
The actions of this council are criminal acts and are bringing the WBC into disrepute. They are doing this in our name and are shaming all of Wirral.
How must Wirral look to the rest of the world ?
This Norman character is a shyster what are his qualifications ?
TheLooseCannon
says...
8:51pm Fri 15 Jan 10
MX
says...
9:00pm Fri 15 Jan 10
There has been a complete lack of leadership in this case.Why hasn't the Leader of the Council,the Health & Social Care Lead,the Chief Executive or local MP stepped in long before now to sort this appalling mess out?.
The failure to take decisive action invites speculation that this is to serve political and/or personal interests and this is the tip of a very dodgy iceberg.
statictom
says...
11:39am Sat 16 Jan 10
MX
says...
7:23pm Sat 16 Jan 10
Apologies I've missed a previous post.
The Loose Cannon says that Frank Field knows about this?.
And he thinks this is OK?.................
............
Oh by the way I know that Stephen Hesford Knows about this too.However how would any one of sound mind entrust anything of any worth in the incapable hands of Mr.Hesford.
He seems to think that wearing a bobbly red scarf makes him a socialist.
Get this self-serving filth off the Wirral.NOW!
Helen A
says...
8:55pm Sat 16 Jan 10
maninthestreet
says...
10:16pm Sat 16 Jan 10
piggymalone
says...
10:46pm Sat 16 Jan 10
e believe that action would do any good?
bluey
says...
1:27pm Sun 17 Jan 10
TheLooseCannon
says...
1:46pm Sun 17 Jan 10
...
Fortunately I have always kept very good records and am able to prove to the Ombudsman that approximately 75% of the Council officers' statements are, quite simply, lies.
...
The Ombudsman seems unable to impose any sanctions against the Council if it chooses to ignore him.
TheLooseCannon
says...
1:48pm Sun 17 Jan 10
piggymalone
says...
1:54pm Sun 17 Jan 10
PaulCa
says...
11:32pm Sun 17 Jan 10
piggymalone
says...
4:05pm Mon 18 Jan 10
Perhaps its about time there was some sort of support group with the expertise to support these people to fight back.
It would be interesting to hear from any other people that were similarly forced out of their employment with the council as Martin Morton and PaulCA were.
hugo2008
says...
8:56pm Mon 18 Jan 10
Plus the deafening silence from our short of usless Members of Parliament about numerous other issues we have or are going to pay for. Please remember when they want your support in an election.
Do give it to them with both barrels. We will have a golden opportunity to clear out so many parasites in one go. Lets get on with the elections, is the battle cry regardless of what Political Party you support.
Veridici
says...
9:13pm Mon 18 Jan 10
.
The social workers' trade magazine Community Care, which is sent to every social worker in the country, has published the story today.
.
http://tinyurl.com/y
bvd8om
Veridici
says...
9:58pm Mon 18 Jan 10
bvd8om
Trying again with the link as it should be all on one line
djrimmer says...
12:00pm Fri 15 Jan 10
l