News RSS Feed


Want to share your opinion, leave a tribute or comment on a news story? It's easy!
You can register for free here and comment on any of our stories. Your news, Your views.

Wirral Council would have broken law if libraries had closed


WIRRAL Council would have been breaking the law if it had proceeded with its plan to close 11 of the borough's 24 libraries, a Government inspector said today.

The closures were scrapped on September 30 - just two days before the first draft of inspector Sue Charteris' report was originally due to be published.

The ruling Lib-Lab cabinet said they were scrapping the controversial closures because of budgetary needs - any planned savings from library closures this year had been lost due to the length of the inquiry into them.

But it has now emerged that had they proceeded the council would have been in breach of its stautory duties under the 1964 Museums and Libraries Act.

Some key points made in the Charteris report are:

* "The council failed to make an assessment of local needs in respect of its Library Services."

* "I am profoundly concerned at the lack of transparency of this process."

* "The council has not been able to demonstrate that it has had due regard to the general requirements of children. I consider this to be a breach of its statutory duties."

* "I recognise that Wirral MBC, like other authorities across the country, has considerable pressure on service budgets and needs to ensure it is making the best use of its resources both now and in the future. The absence of a strategic plan or a development plan for the service, based on an assessment of need and a contemporaneous review of the service, completely hinders the council being able to describe how its plans will meet the needs of and have due regard for those who live, work and study in Wirral."

* "I believe that the evidence shows that the Council took the decision to close the libraries without having first established the extent and range of library provision it was providing within the buildings, including those which were 'core' to the service and which were ancillary."

* "My assessment is that the Council’s decision to close 11 of its libraries and develop the remaining 13 into integrated Neighbourhood Centres was and remains premature, and risks being a partial response to local need that would disadvantage relatively isolated and deprived communities. I therefore believe there to be a further breach in relation to the needs of deprived communities.

* "I have found that due to the absence of an assessment of needs and a strategic Library Service review, the council has displayed a lack of logic around why some facilities were recommended for closure and not others."

Today, Culture Minister Margaret Hodge said there would be no "decision" made by Secretary of State as Wirral had abandoned the closures.

A Department for Culture, Media and Sport spokesman said "It is clearly no longer appropriate to rule on their [Wirral's]earlier decision.

"Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council are therefore not in breach of their statutory duty."

Miss Hodge's statement says: "Pursuant to his powers under the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964 (“the Act”), the Secretary of State launched a local inquiry into the library service provided by Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (“Wirral MBC”) to gather evidence to test whether Wirral MBC's planned restructuring of that service was consistent with their statutory duty to provide the people of Wirral with a comprehensive and efficient public library service.

"He is satisfied that the Inquiry has been conducted fairly and in accordance with the statutory rules on procedure.

"However, after the report on the Inquiry was received by the Secretary of State, Wirral MBC revoked their plans to restructure their service.

"In these circumstances it is no longer necessary for the Secretary of State to take a view on proposals which have since been dropped.

"There is therefore no finding that Wirral MBC are in breach of their statutory duty.

"The Secretary of State welcomes Wirral MBC’s decision to reconsider plans to restructure their library service.

"We hope that they will take account of the issues raised, alongside the conclusions which emerge from the national libraries review, when considering future decisions.

"In respect of any wider implications of the Inquiry, the Secretary of State confirms that, in accordance with the clear requirements of the Act, local authorities are well placed to understand the needs of their local communities and are responsible for delivering local services relative to those needs.

"The Secretary of State will always wish, where possible, to use ways other than a formal inquiry in exercising his statutory obligations.

"It is, however, an ongoing requirement of all local authorities to fulfil their duties under the Act, and of the Secretary of State to consider intervening where an allegation or question arises that an authority may not have done so.

"The Secretary of State wishes to emphasise the importance of all local authorities, being mindful of the needs of those living, working and studying in the area and of how they are addressing such needs in fulfilling their duty to deliver a comprehensive and efficient service."



Your Say Your Globe

hugo2008, Wirral says...
4:36pm Mon 30 Nov 09

seems that not only elected councillors were prepared to break the law, but some of the high ranking council employees fully supported the actions to close libraries. The same bunch of misguided useless characters have known about this for a considerable time, and tried hard to suppress the facts from the public. what a total fiasco and complete lack of professional integrity shown all round. To a person they should apologise emphatically to the population of Wirral, without reservation. They collectively do not have the decency to resign, which is a shame.

piggymalone, wirral says...
9:27am Tue 1 Dec 09

"In breach of statutory duties" so what the heck are we paying Norman for...he is the head of legal services and should know what is legal and what is not, never mind Foulkes and Holbrook, Norman should be consigned to to the graveyard for useless solicitors

MX, Wirral says...
8:14pm Tue 1 Dec 09

Hmmmmm....
This rings an (alarm)bell.
Clearly Mr.Norman does have a problem with lawful and unlawful as he demonstrated at last weeks Audit & Risk Management Committee.
Lawful seems to mean: "If I say so....".
Unlawful means "What ever, is er, inconvenient or, ahem, embarrassing and costly and anyway I don't have to explain to you why don't you just go away you irritating council tax payer "

Jayo, Wallasey says...
9:48pm Tue 1 Dec 09

I think the mistake we are making here Piggy and MX is that we assume the people in the high ranking posts are actually qualified for the duties they perform.
This whole sorry affair made the pages of Private Eye and to do that proves this is high level incompetence.

piggymalone, wirral says...
11:10pm Tue 1 Dec 09

MX....love your definition of what the council think is lawful or unlawful, me thinks you have their interpretation spot on.
Jayo...good point, I suppose I or we are assuming that the high ranking officers are fully qualified

Ivorromaleyn, New Brighton says...
10:43am Wed 2 Dec 09

Jayo
Confirms my view, that the current electoral fiddle is past its sell by date.
Party politics and the whip has negated its value
Why not appoint people from the Jury list a random? Random Selection would be more likely to represent the views of the people as against vested interests.

minimad69, Birkenhead says...
2:13pm Wed 2 Dec 09

The real crux of the u-turn was the clowns found out they could be removed from office for "gross misconduct" - so the u-turn has nothing to do whatsoever with the 'budget' lies foulkes spouts at every turn, but merely to save their pitiful political skins and cushy jobs...

Jayo, Wallasey says...
9:11pm Wed 2 Dec 09

Ivorromaleyn wrote:
Jayo Confirms my view, that the current electoral fiddle is past its sell by date. Party politics and the whip has negated its value Why not appoint people from the Jury list a random? Random Selection would be more likely to represent the views of the people as against vested interests.
I dont know about that Ivor.(random selection) It might lead to years of "sod the struggle I'm foreman now"
Its been pointed out many times on this site that party politics is undemocratic

***************
Piggy, The council has the feel of "my mate got me in" don't you think?

piggymalone, wirral says...
11:10pm Wed 2 Dec 09

Jayo, yes I do agree that the party political system does appear to feed the "old pals act". In fact it is actually one reason why there are very few independent MPs and councillors in this country. The political parties play the dirty tricks game particularly against independent candidates

Heswall Booklover, Heswall says...
7:47pm Thu 3 Dec 09

To me, Sue Charteris's most telling comment in the report was the following: "The voice of the Head of Service (as the professional expert) is absent in the reports to Council concerning the fundamental changes to the service. I would argue that this is unusual." Sue Powell, and all the library staff, deserve our sympathy and support in dealing with the aftermath of this fiasco. Let's not use the report as a stick to beat the councillors with (as they may not be around long enough to take any meaningful action while still in office); rather, plans should be drawn up to improve what is already recognised, in the report, as a fine service. And that means ensuring that the needs of users, actual and potential, are met (and a little more preventive maintenance of council buildings wouldn't be a bad idea, either).

Comments are closed on this article.

Inquiry chairman Sue Charteris Sue Charteris

Local advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »