News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Councillor blasts Wirral 'Whistleblower' inquiry as a sham

Cllr Simon Mountney Cllr Simon Mountney

The outcome of a major inquiry into the systematic overcharging of vulnerable people under the care of Wirral Council social services has been branded a “sham.”

Internal auditors carrying out a probe into a controversial “special charging policy” as it is known, made a last-minute discovery of a 12-year-old document which they said proved the policy had been officially sanctioned by a council committee in September of 1997.

They said this “changed everything.”

Even so, their long-awaited report still revealed that some clients had been overcharged by more than £100,000, and recommends the authority should now repay the cash.

The overcharging only came to light when a council “whistleblower” raised the alarm in the Wirral Globe.

But this week, Cllr Simon Mountney, who has been leading a campaign on behalf of the anonymous whistleblower, said the discovered document was “unlawful.”

Lambasting the internal audit as “just a sham” he is calling for external auditors to be brought in to launch a “full and proper” inquiry.

He said: “The discovery of that document, which nobody up until that point even realised existed, has actually changed nothing at all.

"It is an unlawful policy and just because some councillors ‘nodded it through’ 12 years ago does not mean it is valid.

“You cannot pass an unlawful minute saying it was okay for the council to take 100% of people’s income.

“We shall call for external auditors to re-examine this whole issue. What the council's internal audit uncovered was just a fraction, the tip of an awfully big iceberg.”

The audit reports says the “special charging policy” was applied at three care homes in Wirral – but nowhere else in the borough.

People were overcharged a total of £116,000, with the sums ranging from “a few hundred pounds to over £15,000”.

The report, which is to be presented to a special council scrutiny meeting on Wednesday, admits the charges to those in “supported living” accommodation were unlawful.

It says the policy was applied at Bermuda Road, Curlew Way and Edgehill Road, all in Moreton, between 1997 and 2006.

It says: “Until April, 2003, the charges levied were, on balance, probably reasonable and lawful.

“However, between April, 2003, when fairer charging should have been brought in, and February, 2006, when fairer charging was actually introduced at ‘in-house’ supporting living units in Wirral, the charges were probably unreasonable, so far as the charges exceeded what would have been levied under fairer charging.

To that extent, the charges levied were also unlawful.”

Wirral Council’s internal audit report also acknowledges no evidence could be found that the policy had been approved by councillors until the final week of completing the document.

But the minutes from the meeting in 1997, appeared to show the necessary approval was given.

A statement from Wirral Council said: “Prior to the council’s internal audit, an investigation was conducted by the Audit Commission.

“This focused on the council’s application of the Department of Health’s Fairer Charging Policy and arrangements for the commissioning and monitoring of contracts for supported living and supported people services.

“The Audit Commission published their findings in August, 2008. The Audit and Risk Management Committee considered the conclusions and then requested an internal investigation.

“The council would like to express its appreciation to the whistleblower for raising these matters and providing evidence.”

Members were also asked to consider appropriate reimbursements if it was felt users had been overcharged.

Comments(13)

GotTheirNumber says...
12:33pm Wed 23 Sep 09

Fi, fo, foe, fum, I smell the desperate measures of PR department gum.

Do they REALLY expect anyone to believe this?

A missing document found at the 11th hour?

How very bloody convenient.

Next we'll be told the 60000+ who protested against library closures were "probably mistaken".

What a bunch of (alleged) crooks.

Veridici says...
12:50pm Wed 23 Sep 09

Be there if you care.

Committee Room 1
Wallasey Town Hall
6pm tonight (Wednesday 23rd)

http://areallyrotten
borough.blogspot.com

piggymalone says...
9:12pm Wed 23 Sep 09

I have it on good authority that numerous council employees were aware of this overcharging. It is now recognised that this over charging was illegal. Knowingly committing an illegal action is the very serious criminal offence of malfeasance in public office and I am at a loss as to understand why the police have not been called in to investigate.

Spiffy says...
9:58am Thu 24 Sep 09

Whats all this "on balance, probably reasonable and lawful" ? Overcharging vulnerable people was either reasonable or it wasnt. It was either lawful or it wasnt. So which is it ?
If just one case was unreasonable and unlawful then that one case needs looking at and those responsible held accountable.
It beats me why councils are even allowed to audit themselves.

magicmel says...
1:43pm Thu 24 Sep 09

Perhaps the concillor would like to contact the elderly people who use the services under wirral council. I have to check my fathers bill, the council in the last bill dated august had added three amounts in May, and only becuase I check them we found they had added just under £60!! To a 89 year ol man this is a lot of money.. look into the facts please. they do "rip the elderly off" like the hospitals do not look after the elderly either, another fact I CAN prove too.

MX says...
7:36pm Thu 24 Sep 09

Sham 2009.
I knew this case was about Council corruption but it gets worse.This is the same case where suspended officers returned to work isn't it?.
Is anyone going to take responsibility for this unholy mess or do we just accept that this is how the Council operates.
Taking money from vulnerable people because you're up the swanee.How low can you go?.

slumdog says...
1:26am Fri 25 Sep 09

Mx, I dont think you can get any lower. Worms belly maybe?

deep throat 6 says...
3:49pm Sat 26 Sep 09

Slumdog wrote; I dont think you can get any lower. Worms belly maybe?

Thease creatures are parasitic corrupt organisms my friend, ive dealt with them, trust me.

Willow Sherbet says...
5:49pm Sat 26 Sep 09

Deep Throat

I have a great deal of knoweledge with these people,corrupt organisms they are. We both know whats to come.

PRENTON MH says...
7:27pm Sat 26 Sep 09

what an absolute disgrace by Wirral Council, bring in the police, get those vunerale people their money back.
How can these people sleep at night? They should be ashamed of themselves.
Well done to Mr Morton for standing up to the bullies and exposing them.

MX says...
8:12pm Sat 26 Sep 09

And well done too to Cllr.Mountney.
I never thought I'd ever write this but there actually appears to be a Wirral Councillor with some integrity.
There is some hope.

hugo2008 says...
9:34am Sun 27 Sep 09

There is definitly some elected peoples representatives "councillors" who do what they are supposed to do, but overall we have too many who just are not worth the air they breathe.
Lets have a complete clear out and an election to only elect about 20 in total including a Mayor, and give them full executive powers to ensure the Wirral Borough Council actually provideds value for money. Our Money.

Spiffy says...
4:18pm Tue 29 Sep 09

A little point of interest....'scuse the pun...but the £100,000.00 should be repaid with interest, surely ?
......
A quick calculation - using a bank charges calculator which doesn't go back to 1997 unfortunately - puts this at £86,019.39 if repaid back to the 1st January 1999.

click2find

Most popular