GLOBE ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: Senior social services officers suspended in Wirral Council whistleblower inquiry set for return

Cllr Simon Mountney Cllr Simon Mountney

TWO senior officers in Wirral Council's social services department - suspended from work for nine months after a Globe report into an alleged cover up of serious financial abuse of vulnerable people - are set for a return to work this week.

The suspensions followed our exclusive front page article on November 5 last year about an Audit Commission report into claims by a council whistleblower that adults in supported living accommodation may have been routinely overcharged for several years.

Moreton Conservative Councillor Simon Mountney believes the overcharging of vulnerable people by the council could amount to around £1m.

And today he described the news that the two suspended officers were returning as "a classic example of a large organisation closing ranks".

"I'd like to know what they would have said if they had been dismissed," said Cllr Mountney.

An email was circulated to Department of Adult Social Services staff on Tuesday written on behalf of director John Webb, advising them of the officers' return to work this Friday, July 24.

'This is a classic example of a large organisation closing ranks'

Cllr Simon Mountney

The email, obtained by the Globe, says the pair will "take some time to get back up to speed on issues and developments within DASS and across Wirral".

"Colleagues will recognise that there is a need now to reflect on the specific accountabilities" of the officers "with changing demands across the department".

The email ends saying that Mr Webb is "sure you will join me in welcoming" the officers back to the department.

However, the Globe understands that the news has been met with a mixed response.

Some staff are reported to be happy at their former colleagues' return to the DASS HQ at Westminster House in Birkenhead, while others have threatened to resign in protest.

In November, the council whistleblower had claimed hundreds of thousands of pounds "at least" were owed to some of the council’s "service users" - vulnerable adults in contracted-out supported living accomodation.

An Audit Commission report addressed the whistleblower's concerns that there was a "special charging policy" which cost vulnerable people extra money dating back as far as 1999 that had not been approved by the council and was "excessive and unlawful".

In its findings, the Audit Commission report said it had "confirmed that a charging policy was applied at some supported living establishments" and that "it is not clear from discussions with [council] officers the extent to which the charging policy was in place or whether it was approved by members [of the council]".

On the issue of whether vulnerable people were still paying more than they should several years after a new policy was implemented, the commission noted: "There remains a substantial risk that users receiving services from one of the council’s service providers are being charged unfairly."

It said that despite a request from the council, one contractor had still "not arranged for the completion of financial assessment forms for service users".

The report also stated: "The council does not always know the actual contributions that the provider requires service users to contribute...

"Consequently, the council is not in a position to know whether the aggregate of charges levied on service users by the council and contributions required by the provider are in compliance with the guidance" on fairer charging.

It added: "It is not clear who is currently ensuring that these service users are receiving adequate protection from the risk of financial abuse."

The council has today confirmed to the Globe that the two officers are returning to work on Friday.

A statement on the matter is expected later.

MORE SOON

* IF YOU have any information about this story, please contact our news editor Justin Dunn in confidence on 0151 906 3053, or email jdunn@wirral-globe.co.uk

Comments(21)

piggymalone says...
1:18pm Wed 22 Jul 09

If the audit commission has reported that these charges were "excessive and unlawful" why has legal action not been taken by the police? and why are these people being re-instated?........
jobs for the boys,hmmmmmmmm

Spiffy says...
1:53pm Wed 22 Jul 09

Piggy the police evidently pick and choose which laws to uphold. The CPS have a lot to answer for.

JackeyB says...
5:05pm Wed 22 Jul 09

Why so long? Why no public inquiry?

Seems its safer for the council to keep them so they don't let the cat out of the bag. What else has been going on?

Spiffy says...
7:04pm Wed 22 Jul 09

It appears - from the article - that service users May have been overcharged but the council does not know. Service users May still be being overcharged but the council does not know. It is fair to assume that no one has received their money back if they Have been overcharged.

The officers should, at the very very least, remain suspended until someone at the council DOES know what is going and sorts the matter out properly.

Not sure why they haven't been sacked. To mismanage a department so spectacularly is surely gross misconduct.

j dixon says...
7:30pm Wed 22 Jul 09

'This is a classic example of a large organisation closing ranks'What a disgrace that these people have retained their jobs and the vunerable adults, whose money social services took, have nohint of getting their money returned to them, another whitewash by a government body

JackeyB says...
8:23pm Wed 22 Jul 09

I don't get it, if they've done some thine wrong why are they going back to work and why no police? If they've done nothing wrong why was the whistleblower paid £45,000 to keep quiet (in earlier report). Disgusting behaviour by the council and social services.

MX says...
9:36pm Wed 22 Jul 09

Corruption!.....

Carol, Prenton says...
11:15pm Wed 22 Jul 09

'This is a classic example of a large organisation closing ranks'How can we as the public have faith in the very people who are employed to protect us. Why was the whistle blower paid to keep quiet if there was nothing to hide? These people should be taken to task, meanwhile vulnerable people are probably still being exploited.

lordthomas says...
11:16pm Wed 22 Jul 09

'This is a classic example of a large organisation closing ranks'apart from the fact these people have not been investigated by the police,they have been suspended no doubt on full pay for 9 MONTHS. do we need these people if the department can run without them for so long more council tax wasted?

Mo Clo says...
10:28am Thu 23 Jul 09

So what happens now? Is the whistle blower going to be ignored? Are the service users in question going to be refunded the money that was apparently stolen from them? Is there going to be a police inquiry into the matter? I do hope so,as there is no other way this matter can be resolved.

maria carr says...
10:37am Thu 23 Jul 09

We all need to be a voice for the vulnerable people.This needs investigating and the cover up exposing.If this was a private company the police would have been called in to investigate fraud, once again social services seem to be exempt from the norm, and will we hear the usual 'lessons have been learnt, and new policys in place'

J.Reed says...
1:05pm Thu 23 Jul 09

I fail to see the problem here, and I actually think the council has acted correctly for once. The whistleblower brought this to our attention in November. An independent enquiry was launched which lasted a ridiculously amount of time and found no evidence. It does seem to be in a pickle but I feel those two officers are now free to return. Innocent until Proven Guilty - they weren’t proven guilty, right?. It also makes me think that it would be a lot easier for the council to have dismissed those employees so it could finally sort this problem out however its oblivious that the council have found out that these employees are actually doing their job currently, , and has keep them in there positions and now has to face all this. I do feel quite sorry for them. has anyone actually considered if the whistleblower was wrong.... public bodies always seem to be in the wrong. never the good boys. and its not helped by the press however that’s my personal view. finally, on the other hand if something fishy is going on then we wont hear the last of this but for now I am satisfied and hope the department can move on stronger and better.

piggymalone says...
6:21pm Thu 23 Jul 09

'This is a classic example of a large organisation closing ranks'According to my contacts in the SS department this practice of overcharging had been going on for some years and indeed was fairly common knowledge with a number of social sevices department staff so perhaps you may now be able to see the problem

JackeyB says...
8:49pm Thu 23 Jul 09

How does J Reed know those two weren't proven guilty?

We don't even know what they were charged with.

If the whistleblower was wrong then why was he paid so much money instead of being sacked?

Natasha Eubank says...
9:12pm Thu 23 Jul 09

Ah yes, the inevitable whitewash. There is SO much more to this story than most are aware of and I strongly encourage the people and press to demand answers from the authority

MX says...
9:45pm Thu 23 Jul 09

Dear J Reed
With respect I don't think you've read previous postings or followed this case closely.
The whistleblower is NOT wrong.There is an Ethical governance Report on the Wirral council website which states:"During the last year the Audit Commissionreceived detailsof an individual's concerns about contracts and charging in adult social services.Our review under the Public Interest Disclosure Act found the individual's concerns to be largely justified and we highlighted the failure of the Council's own systems for dealing with complaints and such concerns,including the whistleblowing procedure".
What's more it would appear the whistleblower whether a he or a she was paid a lot of money.
The fact that officers will be returning to work is NOT a proof of innocence.You wouldn't believe what you'd have to do to be sacked by the Council,although I can't think of many things worse than the financial abuse of vulnerable people.
However I do agree that something fishy is going on and it stinks to high heaven.
It is the rancid stench of corruption.

ginger26 says...
10:31pm Thu 23 Jul 09

'This is a classic example of a large organisation closing ranks'a scandal , how corrupt is ss shame on webb

Marleys Ghost says...
12:24am Fri 24 Jul 09

Let's get this straight: Two senior officers of Wirral's social services were suspended nine months ago following allegations from a whistleblower that the Audit Comission subsequently found to be "largely justyified". However, we do not know what they were charged with, never mind whether they were found to be guilty or not. We no nothing of their defence but I expect it would be in the line of "We were only following orders" - but this didn't wash in Nuremburgh and so should not do so here. If they knowingly coluded with the unlawful charges that have taken, according to Cllr. Mountney, up to £1,000,000 from a group of vulnerable people, then they should surely face the consequences. If they felt powerless to do anything to prevent this abuse, then clearly other, more senior officials should be brought to book and this may include elected members. Nothing short of a public inquirey is needed to sort this mess out. In the meantime, when are the victims of this scandal going to be repaid???

JackeyB says...
2:21pm Fri 24 Jul 09

People hve been saying for months that there has to be a public inquiry. If no inquiry, then why aren't the police involved?

MX says...
8:36pm Sun 26 Jul 09

Reed =Plant.
Freud was a genius.
No reply from our Caldy resident.No doubt "the real world" was just a little bit too frightening or perhaps our friends in the Council had ulterior motives for planting this completely bogus post.


hugo2008 says...
8:48pm Sun 26 Jul 09

If the truth and the whole truth is not available in this matter, then the damage to our social services is very great, and we should all stand up and say so

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree