GLOBE ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: Senior social services officers suspended in Wirral Council whistleblower inquiry set for return (From Wirral Globe)
Send us news by text, start your message Globe News and your send photos and videos to 80360
GLOBE ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: Senior social services officers suspended in Wirral Council whistleblower inquiry set for return
2:30pm Wednesday 22nd July 2009 in News Exclusive By Justin Dunn
Cllr Simon Mountney
TWO senior officers in Wirral Council's social services department - suspended from work for nine months after a Globe report into an alleged cover up of serious financial abuse of vulnerable people - are set for a return to work this week.
The suspensions followed our exclusive front page article on November 5 last year about an Audit Commission report into claims by a council whistleblower that adults in supported living accommodation may have been routinely overcharged for several years.
Moreton Conservative Councillor Simon Mountney believes the overcharging of vulnerable people by the council could amount to around £1m.
And today he described the news that the two suspended officers were returning as "a classic example of a large organisation closing ranks".
"I'd like to know what they would have said if they had been dismissed," said Cllr Mountney.
An email was circulated to Department of Adult Social Services staff on Tuesday written on behalf of director John Webb, advising them of the officers' return to work this Friday, July 24.
'This is a classic example of a large organisation closing ranks'
Cllr Simon Mountney
The email, obtained by the Globe, says the pair will "take some time to get back up to speed on issues and developments within DASS and across Wirral".
"Colleagues will recognise that there is a need now to reflect on the specific accountabilities" of the officers "with changing demands across the department".
The email ends saying that Mr Webb is "sure you will join me in welcoming" the officers back to the department.
However, the Globe understands that the news has been met with a mixed response.
Some staff are reported to be happy at their former colleagues' return to the DASS HQ at Westminster House in Birkenhead, while others have threatened to resign in protest.
In November, the council whistleblower had claimed hundreds of thousands of pounds "at least" were owed to some of the council’s "service users" - vulnerable adults in contracted-out supported living accomodation.
An Audit Commission report addressed the whistleblower's concerns that there was a "special charging policy" which cost vulnerable people extra money dating back as far as 1999 that had not been approved by the council and was "excessive and unlawful".
In its findings, the Audit Commission report said it had "confirmed that a charging policy was applied at some supported living establishments" and that "it is not clear from discussions with [council] officers the extent to which the charging policy was in place or whether it was approved by members [of the council]".
On the issue of whether vulnerable people were still paying more than they should several years after a new policy was implemented, the commission noted: "There remains a substantial risk that users receiving services from one of the council’s service providers are being charged unfairly."
It said that despite a request from the council, one contractor had still "not arranged for the completion of financial assessment forms for service users".
The report also stated: "The council does not always know the actual contributions that the provider requires service users to contribute...
"Consequently, the council is not in a position to know whether the aggregate of charges levied on service users by the council and contributions required by the provider are in compliance with the guidance" on fairer charging.
It added: "It is not clear who is currently ensuring that these service users are receiving adequate protection from the risk of financial abuse."
The council has today confirmed to the Globe that the two officers are returning to work on Friday.
A statement on the matter is expected later.
MORE SOON
* IF YOU have any information about this story, please contact our news editor Justin Dunn in confidence on 0151 906 3053, or email jdunn@wirral-globe.co.uk
Comments(21)
Spiffy
says...
1:53pm Wed 22 Jul 09
JackeyB
says...
5:05pm Wed 22 Jul 09
Seems its safer for the council to keep them so they don't let the cat out of the bag. What else has been going on?
Spiffy
says...
7:04pm Wed 22 Jul 09
The officers should, at the very very least, remain suspended until someone at the council DOES know what is going and sorts the matter out properly.
Not sure why they haven't been sacked. To mismanage a department so spectacularly is surely gross misconduct.
j dixon
says...
7:30pm Wed 22 Jul 09
JackeyB
says...
8:23pm Wed 22 Jul 09
MX
says...
9:36pm Wed 22 Jul 09
Carol, Prenton
says...
11:15pm Wed 22 Jul 09
lordthomas
says...
11:16pm Wed 22 Jul 09
Mo Clo
says...
10:28am Thu 23 Jul 09
maria carr
says...
10:37am Thu 23 Jul 09
J.Reed
says...
1:05pm Thu 23 Jul 09
piggymalone
says...
6:21pm Thu 23 Jul 09
JackeyB
says...
8:49pm Thu 23 Jul 09
We don't even know what they were charged with.
If the whistleblower was wrong then why was he paid so much money instead of being sacked?
Natasha Eubank
says...
9:12pm Thu 23 Jul 09
MX
says...
9:45pm Thu 23 Jul 09
With respect I don't think you've read previous postings or followed this case closely.
The whistleblower is NOT wrong.There is an Ethical governance Report on the Wirral council website which states:"During the last year the Audit Commissionreceived detailsof an individual's concerns about contracts and charging in adult social services.Our review under the Public Interest Disclosure Act found the individual's concerns to be largely justified and we highlighted the failure of the Council's own systems for dealing with complaints and such concerns,including the whistleblowing procedure".
What's more it would appear the whistleblower whether a he or a she was paid a lot of money.
The fact that officers will be returning to work is NOT a proof of innocence.You wouldn't believe what you'd have to do to be sacked by the Council,although I can't think of many things worse than the financial abuse of vulnerable people.
However I do agree that something fishy is going on and it stinks to high heaven.
It is the rancid stench of corruption.
ginger26
says...
10:31pm Thu 23 Jul 09
Marleys Ghost
says...
12:24am Fri 24 Jul 09
JackeyB
says...
2:21pm Fri 24 Jul 09
MX
says...
8:36pm Sun 26 Jul 09
Freud was a genius.
No reply from our Caldy resident.No doubt "the real world" was just a little bit too frightening or perhaps our friends in the Council had ulterior motives for planting this completely bogus post.
hugo2008
says...
8:48pm Sun 26 Jul 09
piggymalone says...
1:18pm Wed 22 Jul 09
jobs for the boys,hmmmmmmmm