Union in mass protest against Wirral cuts (From Wirral Globe)
Send us news by text, start your message Globe News and your send photos and videos to 80360
Union in mass protest against Wirral cuts
10:53am Monday 18th February 2013 in News By Geoff Barnes
FLASBACK: Protesters outside Wallasey Town Hall in November. Picture: Craig Manning
TRADE Unionists will converge on Wallasey town hall tonight for a mass demonstration against the coalition government's slashing of public services.
Around 700 Wirral Council jobs are at risk as the local authority wields the axe to cut spending by £77m over this financial year.
Town hall union Unison have issued a rallying call before tonight’s demonstration, stating: "We need members of the Wirral public to join us in standing up for council services."
They claim the "Condems" want to slash over £100m from services over the next three years – affecting families, friends and neighbours.
The rally will form up at Seacombe Ferry at 5pm before demonstrators march on the town hall to make their views known at tonight's council budget cabinet.
The threat of strikes was averted two weeks ago when councillors voted to give enhanced redundancy pay-offs to hundreds of staff who face losing their jobs.
Council leader Phil Davies pledged: "This administration is committed to avoiding compulsory redundancies as far as possible. We need well-motivated people to be a high-performing council."
The council has sent out more than 3,000 letters to workers informing them their positions are on the "at risk" list.
Whitehall has indicated that Wirral Council could use its capital receipts to pay for redundancies, though this has yet to be ratified in writing.
Joe Taylor, branch secretary of Wirral Unison welcomed Cllr Davies's remarks that the job losses would be on a voluntary basis.
He warned, however: "If the council was to go for compulsory redundancies I would have to ballot member for industrial action.
"We have moved away from that now."
Over the week-end Unison general secretary Dave Prentis claimed that members faced losing their jobs and their public services because of the "the thirst of the rich, the greed of the bankers and the failure of government."
Addressing Unison's women’s conference in Liverpool Mr Prentis proposed an alternative to Chancellor George Osborne’s austerity economics.
He said: "You have to invest for growth, invest to protect, invest for a future that works."
He condemned the government for using the economic crisis “as their opportunity to finish what Thatcher started – the privatisation of the NHS, schools and the police force."
Comments(16)
PaulCa
says...
12:14pm Mon 18 Feb 13
Northern UNISON members.... Google it please and see who's leading you all up the garden path....
WirralAl
says...
12:57pm Mon 18 Feb 13
Well said Phil. When we will finally have a high-performing council?
It looks like you lot and the senior officers who have failed us for so many years need to go first without the normal massive payoffs and great pensions.
Dave Prentis sounds like another labour liar standing up for the rights of the workers while living the high life at the expense of its members!
If this protest is about the cuts by government why protest outside the Wallasey town hall?
This council have not really got a clue about what to do and bumble from pillar to post looking what to do next.
Octoberman
says...
1:35pm Mon 18 Feb 13
The Councillors all receive a basic £9,000 allowance - which equates to £1.98m over 3 years.
A simple choice
As a council worker and union member I recognise that the struggle for decent terms and conditions for staff goes hand in hand with the struggle to save services. It's not one or the other.
I hope everyone that posts on this story will be down at the March tonight.
The Council are making bad decisions - when someone opposes bad decisions my instinct is to agree and support. Nothing wrong with constructive criticism, but lets hope everyone criticising the Council will be out there supporting the protest tonight. What Prentis is earning is a matter for debate, but that should not affect tonmight's protest
The Labour Councillors all moan that the Tories are making them do this. Well I was taught by my parents to stand up to bullies!
It time the Councillors took a stand and set a budget based on the community's needs rather than devestating the community.
Wwe cannot afford these cuts!
ArdalMcFardle
says...
3:30pm Mon 18 Feb 13
steady cyclist
says...
3:30pm Mon 18 Feb 13
All of us could probably think of descent cuts to save money,like scrapping a lot of traffic lights, free parking after 3pm like a lot of other towns have, to bring shoppers in, and a reduction in parking attendants in car parks and more on the strreet, enforcing the parking rules, and raising money.
Enforcement of dog fouling,again self funding, if done right,closure of a lot of council ofices, and one big office in an old school etc.
Switch off all non security lights at night, on public buildings.
Have a cull of traffic signs and sell them for scrap,and lots more minor cuts, but as TESCO SAYS EVERY LITTLE HELPS
WirralAl
says...
3:40pm Mon 18 Feb 13
Octoberman wrote:The current leaders of the council. Councillors and Senior officers have been bullies for years. No matter what is said to them they ignore it and do what they want. It is the Labour councillors who have wasted too much money for years. I don't think that many of them only take a basic allowance.
The proposed savings from closing Day Centre's is £2m over 3 years.
The Councillors all receive a basic £9,000 allowance - which equates to £1.98m over 3 years.
A simple choice
As a council worker and union member I recognise that the struggle for decent terms and conditions for staff goes hand in hand with the struggle to save services. It's not one or the other.
I hope everyone that posts on this story will be down at the March tonight.
The Council are making bad decisions - when someone opposes bad decisions my instinct is to agree and support. Nothing wrong with constructive criticism, but lets hope everyone criticising the Council will be out there supporting the protest tonight. What Prentis is earning is a matter for debate, but that should not affect tonmight's protest
The Labour Councillors all moan that the Tories are making them do this. Well I was taught by my parents to stand up to bullies!
It time the Councillors took a stand and set a budget based on the community's needs rather than devestating the community.
Wwe cannot afford these cuts!
Unions and the Labour party are all working together on this. The leaders of both have been taking the most out of the system for years. More fool you if you think they do this for you. It is all for themselves.
Octoberman
says...
3:52pm Mon 18 Feb 13
WirralAl wrote:I'm neither a fool nor naive
Octoberman wrote:The current leaders of the council. Councillors and Senior officers have been bullies for years. No matter what is said to them they ignore it and do what they want. It is the Labour councillors who have wasted too much money for years. I don't think that many of them only take a basic allowance.
The proposed savings from closing Day Centre's is £2m over 3 years.
The Councillors all receive a basic £9,000 allowance - which equates to £1.98m over 3 years.
A simple choice
As a council worker and union member I recognise that the struggle for decent terms and conditions for staff goes hand in hand with the struggle to save services. It's not one or the other.
I hope everyone that posts on this story will be down at the March tonight.
The Council are making bad decisions - when someone opposes bad decisions my instinct is to agree and support. Nothing wrong with constructive criticism, but lets hope everyone criticising the Council will be out there supporting the protest tonight. What Prentis is earning is a matter for debate, but that should not affect tonmight's protest
The Labour Councillors all moan that the Tories are making them do this. Well I was taught by my parents to stand up to bullies!
It time the Councillors took a stand and set a budget based on the community's needs rather than devestating the community.
Wwe cannot afford these cuts!
Unions and the Labour party are all working together on this. The leaders of both have been taking the most out of the system for years. More fool you if you think they do this for you. It is all for themselves.
I will seek to hold to account those who fall short - Councillors and union 'leaders' - but in the mean time I'm not going to sit on my hands
I will be protesting tonight and in the future against these cuts - to the workforce and the community
I know hundred's of other trade union members and people who rely on services will be there as well
Will you???
Stop having a go at people who are fighting these cuts - and join us (f you want things to improve)
PaulCa
says...
4:19pm Mon 18 Feb 13
Octoberman wrote:Fine WORDS about 'standing up to bullies'. But I imagine your parents might be feeling a bit concerned if they read them.
The proposed savings from closing Day Centre's is £2m over 3 years.
The Councillors all receive a basic £9,000 allowance - which equates to £1.98m over 3 years.
A simple choice
As a council worker and union member I recognise that the struggle for decent terms and conditions for staff goes hand in hand with the struggle to save services. It's not one or the other.
I hope everyone that posts on this story will be down at the March tonight.
The Council are making bad decisions - when someone opposes bad decisions my instinct is to agree and support. Nothing wrong with constructive criticism, but lets hope everyone criticising the Council will be out there supporting the protest tonight. What Prentis is earning is a matter for debate, but that should not affect tonmight's protest
The Labour Councillors all moan that the Tories are making them do this. Well I was taught by my parents to stand up to bullies!
It time the Councillors took a stand and set a budget based on the community's needs rather than devestating the community.
Wwe cannot afford these cuts!
So let's talk about ACTIONS.
If your instinct is to oppose and support action against bad decisions, tell me what you were doing when other whistleblowing colleagues of yours were doing the right thing, and telling the wider world about the disabled abuse, bullying, denials, sham investigations, 4 week delay on care, contract impropriety, etc. etc. etc. that your councillor and senior officer colleagues were indulging in.
WHERE was UNISON - they dropped Martin Morton from a great height - because supporting him became difficult - and would almost certainly have exposed THEM fpr what they are 'deep in the pockets of the bosses'.
Did you only climb above the parapet when you saw a threat to your OWN security? A threat to the standard of living you've become accustomed to? Or have you been in the background, agitating and doing things 'under cover'? That might explain it. We'd like to know.
We don't want to think that you've been standing on the sidelines watching, as learning disabled people were discriminated against, attacked, crushed, having their bank accounts plundered of £700,000 plus.
Because a situation like that is criminal, and needs to be shouted from the rooftops, council employee or not.
Looking the other way, staying mute and 'crossing to the other side of the road' is not acceptable.
I hope your involvement in all future protest is not so selective and wrapped up in double standards.
Octoberman
says...
4:30pm Mon 18 Feb 13
PaulCa wrote:What a sanctimonious comment.
Octoberman wrote:Fine WORDS about 'standing up to bullies'. But I imagine your parents might be feeling a bit concerned if they read them.
The proposed savings from closing Day Centre's is £2m over 3 years.
The Councillors all receive a basic £9,000 allowance - which equates to £1.98m over 3 years.
A simple choice
As a council worker and union member I recognise that the struggle for decent terms and conditions for staff goes hand in hand with the struggle to save services. It's not one or the other.
I hope everyone that posts on this story will be down at the March tonight.
The Council are making bad decisions - when someone opposes bad decisions my instinct is to agree and support. Nothing wrong with constructive criticism, but lets hope everyone criticising the Council will be out there supporting the protest tonight. What Prentis is earning is a matter for debate, but that should not affect tonmight's protest
The Labour Councillors all moan that the Tories are making them do this. Well I was taught by my parents to stand up to bullies!
It time the Councillors took a stand and set a budget based on the community's needs rather than devestating the community.
Wwe cannot afford these cuts!
So let's talk about ACTIONS.
If your instinct is to oppose and support action against bad decisions, tell me what you were doing when other whistleblowing colleagues of yours were doing the right thing, and telling the wider world about the disabled abuse, bullying, denials, sham investigations, 4 week delay on care, contract impropriety, etc. etc. etc. that your councillor and senior officer colleagues were indulging in.
WHERE was UNISON - they dropped Martin Morton from a great height - because supporting him became difficult - and would almost certainly have exposed THEM fpr what they are 'deep in the pockets of the bosses'.
Did you only climb above the parapet when you saw a threat to your OWN security? A threat to the standard of living you've become accustomed to? Or have you been in the background, agitating and doing things 'under cover'? That might explain it. We'd like to know.
We don't want to think that you've been standing on the sidelines watching, as learning disabled people were discriminated against, attacked, crushed, having their bank accounts plundered of £700,000 plus.
Because a situation like that is criminal, and needs to be shouted from the rooftops, council employee or not.
Looking the other way, staying mute and 'crossing to the other side of the road' is not acceptable.
I hope your involvement in all future protest is not so selective and wrapped up in double standards.
I guess we can all sit in a pure ivory tower and cast stones at others.
I'd rather not though
By the way did you stand for any union positions when you worked at a council.??
Anyway I can't sit at my computer all day - I've a protest to go to!
Hon
says...
4:54pm Mon 18 Feb 13
Positive thinker
says...
5:14pm Mon 18 Feb 13
Hugo1008
says...
6:28pm Mon 18 Feb 13
There is no way a Political Party Representative should be supported by the rate payers.
I anyone wants to stand on a Party Political platform they should be supported by the paid up members of that Party.
Next time learn the lesson "Pick a New Face" any face that pledges to work exclusively for and on behalf of the electorate, then and only then can the ratepayers support that candidate.
And above all considerations do not vote for Labour Party Clown, nor a Conservative do nothing lackey, and certainly never for a Liberal/Democrat, turncoat parasite.
Vote for an Individual who will listen to you, and act accordingly, on your behalf and for your interests and well being, after all you are paying the bill not a Local Politician.
Did you know 95% of the population do not belong to any Political Party and just want to get on with life.
dave301bounty
says...
7:16pm Mon 18 Feb 13
ordinary personn
says...
8:19pm Mon 18 Feb 13
Positive thinker
says...
11:29pm Mon 18 Feb 13
But what do you know not much by
the sounds of it
Positive thinker says...
12:02pm Mon 18 Feb 13