Chief executive's appointment splits Wirral Council (From Wirral Globe)
Send us news by text, start your message Globe News and your send photos and videos to 80360
Chief executive's appointment splits Wirral Council
10:16am Tuesday 29th January 2013 in News By Stephanie Cureton
Chief executive Graham Burgess
WIRRAL Council's chief executive has been given a permanent role at the local authority.
Graham Burgess was appointed last night as the borough’s head of paid service - but the move did not please all political parties.
At a meeting of the full council, the ruling Labour group gave their backing to Mr Burgess, but Tories and the majority of Lib Dems voted against the decision, saying it was being made “too soon”.
The chief executive was taken on under a fixed term two-year agreement last year. Council leader Cllr Phil Davies said it was essential to make his role permanent to ensure council stability.
Councillor Davies said: “I believe it is important to make this change now and I think it’s incredibly important to send a strong message to our staff and the outside world that we have stability at the top of office.
“Graham went through a competitive process last year for a two year contract but I do believe that it’s important to secure his service for the long term and I know that he is happy to support that.”
However Conservative group leader Cllr Jeff Green said the appointment would not be supported by his side at a time when the council was facing a major funding crisis and service cuts.
He said: “I think he [Mr Burgess] is doing a good job and demonstrating many of the qualities I hoped he would when he was brought in.
"What I really don’t understand is the sudden urgency to do this now - he has only completed three to four months of his two years.
“At a time when we are asking a whole range of staff to reapply for their jobs, and when the chances are we will have to make a whole range of redundancies, I think it’s wrong we should rush into this and seek to appoint Graham at this time.”
Liberal Democrat group leader Cllr Tom Harney also expressed his support for Mr Burgess’ work, but argued the matter of appointing him permanently was “too early.”
He said: “We thoroughly support Graham Burgess and the work he has done and the direction the council is going.
“But what has changed all of a sudden? I think it would be useful for all of us and the public to know.”
Councillor Davies replied he was responding to comments from staff about Mr Burgess’ temporary role and said he was showing leadership by moving to secure a permanent position.
Accepting his appointment, Mr Burgess - placed on permanent contract by 36 votes to 26 - said: “Thank-you very much for this appointment.
"I will serve all parties on the council, as you would expect me to.”
Comments(11)
WirralAl
says...
11:54am Tue 29 Jan 13
Perhaps if he thinks its better to reduce the 66 to 33 he may be more popular after all we have already got too many free loading useless, expensive and blithering incompetent free loaders!
Next comes the big axe. Wirral council employees will be slashed. Services will go and we will still pay the same money for 1/2 the service.
Great news ! I am sure we can't wait.
PaulCa
says...
12:30pm Tue 29 Jan 13
But who on earth would want to take on such a daunting responsibility?
Step forward, newly permanent CEO Graham Burgess... whose empire grows by the day.
ordinary personn
says...
12:37pm Tue 29 Jan 13
The excuse for advertising the job as a FTA seems to be that the council wanted to test out a chief executive to make sure they fit the bill before making them permanent. There are other ways of doing this – what was wrong with having a probationary period of say six months?
rover600
says...
2:03pm Tue 29 Jan 13
I am sure there are lots of minimum(ish) waged agency workers and others who are on permanent short term contracts, this position could have been exactly the same. If Mr Burgess felt this wasn't acceptable I know plenty inclusing myself who would gladly do the job for probably half of what he is getting. We Wirral residents deserve, nay are entitled to value for money and that doesn;t come by paying 'fat cat salaries and expense packages and exit packages' to 'Senior Staff/Executives. Have this lot learned nothing?
bigfoot
says...
2:11pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Growl Tiger
says...
2:14pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Hugo1008
says...
4:55pm Tue 29 Jan 13
The real people to blame are the ruling body of Cabinet less than a dozen Labour Councillors in this case.
The remainder of 50 something Councillors may mouth platitudes but none of them will step outside the Party Political Boundaries, whilst they have the power to call a halt to the whole farce and demand that Government Overseers or Commission Officers (Whatever the title is these days) are drafted in to carry out a proper inspection resulting from the behind closed door dealings.
This is required to provide the population of Wirral with some degree of Honesty, with Open, Transparent, Fair, Clean, dealings, and eradicate the deep scandal and malaise that has dogged this administration for over 20 years, Mostly under Labour Control but the Conservatives and Lib/Dems have at times been equally culpable in a sheer lack of Democratic Governance.
Just remember this when the time comes there are less than a handful of the present Councilors from any of the parties that are of any use to the population of Wirral.
ordinary personn
says...
8:01am Wed 30 Jan 13
Thepleb
says...
12:01pm Wed 30 Jan 13
He should be judged after doing the job he was brought to do I.e cut jobs and services then when the council is cut short by 700 more staff and day centres,library's and leisure centres are closed and the council staff that remain are low on moral after wage cuts and their terms and conditions have been plundered then make sure GB has the security of a full time position so he doesn't worry himself to sleep on his part time temporary £120,000 a year wage....yet another ill conceived and bad timed decision by some of the 66 .....
bickyboy
says...
10:15am Sat 2 Feb 13
As stated above, had the position been advertised as permanent it might have attracted candidates who could play the long game as well. To my knowledge, GB hasn't yet demonstrated anything more substantial than an aptitude for grim prophecy on a scale that would make Nostradamus green with envy.
PaulCa says...
11:51am Tue 29 Jan 13
o New man arrives on temporary contract
o New man beds himself in and gets the lie of the land
o Performance-based deal is ignored
o Suggestion is made to HR boss
o HR boss officially advises councillors against "risk to the public" of not making new man's position more secure
o HR boss's recommendation - they're only obeying orders - is endorsed by councillors
o New man happy. He's permanent
o HR boss happy. She's in the good books
o Many councillors happy. They've been duped