STEVEN Spielberg's Jurassic Park asked us to imagine what it would be like if dinosaurs were brought back to life 65 million years after their extinction.

It was both a groundbreaking film and idea at the same time back in the 90s.

And while Jurassic World's £1.6billion bite out of the box office shows fans have lost none of their appetite for the series, Colin Trevorrow's new film imagines a time when people have grown bored of dinosaurs.

Trevorrow's movie takes us forward two decades to time when visitors are apathetic about these wonders of nature.

If Jurassic Park was a zoo, then Jurassic World is a theme park dictated by profits and focus groups and the film's biggest strength is the way it takes a dig at corporate interference and the 'theme-parkisation' of everything.

In their infinite wisdom, Jurassic World's owners agree to a project to genetically modify a new dinosaur species to boost visitor numbers.

'Indominus Rex' proves to be more intelligent and aggressive than even the Tyrannosaurus Rex and, well, you can probably guess the rest.

Jurassic World may have worked better as a reboot rather than a sequel because we are expected to believe that after the catastrophic events of the original trilogy a new riskier park opened on the same grounds.

The film also has plenty of plot threads that go nowhere and you may find you soon lose patience with the two lead kids Zach and Gray (Nick Robinson and Ty Simpkins) after one stupid decision after another.

But for pure entertainment, Jurassic World is an enjoyable addition to the series and Chris Pratt, rumoured to be the next Indiana Jones, continues to shine as a leading man.

DAVID MORGAN